Justification of diagnostic medical exposures: Some practical issues. Report of an International Atomic Energy Agency Consultation

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 85, Issue 1013, 2012, Pages 523-538

  Malone, Jim ^a,b   Guleria, R ^c   Craven, C ^d   Horton, P ^e   Jarvinen H ^f   Mayo, J ^g   O'Reilly, G ^h   Picano, E ⁱ   Remedios, D ^j   Le Heron, J ^a   Rehani, M ^a   Holmberg, O ^a   Czarwinski, R ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY   (Austria)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^c ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

^d Law Library   (Ireland)

^e ROYAL SURREY COUNTY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f STUK RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY   (Finland)

^g UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^h ST JAMES S HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

ⁱ INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY   (Italy)

^j NORTHWICK PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION HAZARD;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HEALTH PLANNING GUIDELINES; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOLOGY; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; RESEARCH REPORT; RISK;

EID: 84860910992     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/42893576     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. Report 91: Recommended standards for the routine performance testing of diagnostic X-ray imaging systems. York, UK: IPEM; 2005.
2. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Quality control in diagnostic radiology. Madison, WI: AAPM; 2002.
3. Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee. Notes for guidance on the clinical administration of radiopharmaceuticals and use of sealed radioactive sources. Chilton, UK: Health Protection Agency (HPA) for ARSAC; 2007.
4. International Atomic Energy Agency. Report of a consultation on justification of patient exposures in medical imaging. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2009;135:137-44.
5. Faulkner K, Zoetelief J, Schultz FW, Guest R, eds. Editorial. In: Safety and efficacy for new techniques and imaging using new equipment to support European legislation: 2008 Delft Conference Proceedings, Delft, Holland. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2008;129:1-2.
6. Malone J, O'Connor U, Faulkner K, eds. Ethical and justification issues in medical radiation protection. Radiat Prot Dosimetry Special Issue 2009;135:Issue 2.
7. Malone J. Radiation protection, ethics, law and public awareness: in harmony or out of tune. European Congress of Radiology (ECR) Book of Abstracts. Eur Radiol Suppl 2008;18:128.
8. Amis ES Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE, Birnbaum SB, Brateman LF, Hevezi JM, et al. American College of Radiology White Paper on Radiation Dose in Medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 2007;4:272-84. (Pubitemid 46671375)
9. National Council on Radiation Protection. Report 160: Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. Bethesda, MD: NCRP; 2009 [cited 12 August 2009]. Available from: http://www.ncrppublications.org/Reports/160
10. Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP. Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 2004;231:393-8. (Pubitemid 38552895)
11. Hadley JL, Agola J, Wong P. Potential impact of the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria on CT for trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:937-42. (Pubitemid 46100191)
12. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Current concepts: computed tomography - an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277-84. (Pubitemid 350190758)
13. Shiralkar S, Rennie A, Snow M, Galland RB, Lewis MH, Gower-Thomas K. Doctors' knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study. BMJ 2003;327:371-2. (Pubitemid 37000070)
14. Picano E. Sustainability of medical imaging. BMJ 2004;328:578-80. (Pubitemid 38316634)
15. Picano E. Informed consent and communication of risk from radiological and nuclear medicine examinations: how to escape from a communication inferno. BMJ 2004;329:849-51. (Pubitemid 39388415)
16. Bedetti G, Pizzi C, Gavaruzzi G, Lugaresi F, Cicognani A, Picano E. Suboptimal awareness of radiologic dose among patients undergoing cardiac stress scintigraphy. J Am Coll Radiol 2008;5:126-31. (Pubitemid 351181403)
17. Royal College of Radiologists. Making the best use of clinical radiology services, 6th edn. London; UK: RCR; 2007.
18. American College of Radiology. Appropriateness criteria [cited 12 November 2009]. Available from: www.acr.org
19. European Commission. Referral guidelines for imaging. Radiation Protection Publication no. 118. Luxembourg: European Commission, DG TREN; 2000 [updated 2008; cited 10 August 2009]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/ energy/nuclear/radioprotection/publication/doc/118-en.pdf
20. European Commission. Council Directive 97/43/Euratom of 30 June 1997, on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure, and repealing Directive 84/466/Euratom. Official Journal of the European Communities No L 1997;180:22-7.
21. European Commission. Medico-legal exposures, exposures with ionizing radiation without medical indication. Radiation Protection Publication 130. Proceedings of the International Symposium. Luxembourg: European Commission, DG TREN, 2003 [cited 10 August 2009]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/ nuclear/radiation-protection/doc/publication/130.pdf
22. Durand-Zaleski I. Organisation and delivery of imaging services: the contributions of ethics and political economy. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2009;135:134-6.
23. International Workshop on Practical Implementation of Clinical Audit for Medical Exposure to Ionizing Radiation, Tampere, Finland, 8-10 September 2008 [cited 7 February 2010]. Available from: http://www.clinicalaudit.net/eu- workshop.html
24. European Commission. European Commission Guidelines on Clinical Audit for Medical Radiological Practices (Diagnostic Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy). Radiation Protection Publication no. 159. Brussels, Belgium: EC,2009 [cited 7 February 2010]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/ nuclear/radiation-protection/doc/publication/159.pdf
25. International Atomic Energy Agency. Clinical audits of diagnostic radiology practices: a tool for quality improvement. Vienna, Austria: IAEA; 2010.
26. Eccles M, Steen N, Grimshaw J, Thomas L, McNamee P, Soutter J. Effect of audit and feedback, and reminder messages on primary-care radiology referrals: a randomised trial. Lancet 2001;357:1406-9. (Pubitemid 32455369)
27. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiological protection in medicine. ICRP Publication no. 105. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1-63.
28. International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication no. 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1-332.
29. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations (ICRP), Radiological Protection in Medicine. Publication No. 105. Ann ICRP 2007;37-6:1-63.
30. Malone JF. Invited Paper: New ethical issues for radiation protection in diagnostic radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2008;129:6-12.
31. Malone JF. Invited Paper: Radiation protection in medicine: ethical framework revisited. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2009;135:71-8.
32. Alaszewski A, Horlick-Jones T. How can doctors communicate information about risk more effectively? BMJ 2003;327:728-31. (Pubitemid 37176758)
33. Ropeik D. Risk communication:more than facts and feelings. IAEA Bull 2008;50:58-60.
34. Sharp D. Plainmedical language. Lancet 1999;354 (9196):2100.
35. Malone J, Holmberg O, Simeonov G, eds. Justification of Medical Exposure in Diagnostic Imaging. Proceedings of an international workshop on justification of medical exposure in diagnostic imaging organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency in cooperation with the European Commission and held in Brussels, 2-4 September 2009. Vienna, Austria: IAEA; 2001.
36. High Court of Australia in Rogers v. Whitaker 1992; 175 CLR 479.
37. The Supreme Court of Canada in Reibl v. Hughes 1980; 2 SCR 880.
38. The United States Canterbury v. Spence 1972; 464 F. 2d 772.
39. General Medical Council Lay Membership Statutory Instruments. The General Medical Council (Constitution) Order 2008, No. 2554 [cited 7 February 2010]. Available from: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/uksi-20082554-en-1 and http://www.gmc-uk.org/about/council/index.asp
40. Sternberg S, DeBarros A. It kills thyroid cancer, but is radiation safe? USA Today 2007;18 November [cited 7 February 2010]. Available from: http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2007-11-18-thyroid-cover-N.htm
41. Bryman A. Ethnography and participant observation. In: Social research methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2001. Chapter 14.
42. Fulcher J, Scott J. Sociology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1999.
43. Wilson GB. Clericalism: the death of priesthood. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press; 2008.
44. National Patient Safety Association. Early identification of failure to act on radiological imaging reports. London, UK: NPSA; 2007.
45. Kumar S, Mankad K, Bhartia B. Awareness of making the best use of a Department of Clinical Radiology among physicians in Leeds teaching hospitals, UK. Br J Radiol 2007;80:140-1.
46. Mankad K, Bull M. Awareness of "Making the best use of a department of clinical radiology" among physicians. Clin Radiol 2005;60:618-19.
47. Soye JA, Paterson A. A survey of awareness of radiation dose among health professionals in Northern Ireland. Br J Radiol 2008;81:725-9.
48. Oikarinen H, Meriläinen S, Pääkkö E, Karttunen A, Nieminen MT, Tervonen O. Unjustified CT examinations in young patients. Eur Radiol 2009;19:1161-5.
49. Almén A, Leitz W, Richter S. National survey on justification of CT-examinations in Sweden. SSM Report 2009:03 ISSN:2000-0456 (2009). Stockholm, Sweden: SSM [cited 7 February 2010]. Available from: http://www. stralsakerhetsmyndigheten.se/Global/Publikationer/Rapport/Stralskydd/2009/ SSM-Rapport-2009-03.pdf
50. American Board of Internal Medicine, American College of Physicians, American Society of Internal Medicine, European Federation of Internal Medicine. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physicians charter. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:243-6.
51. Corbett RH, Malone J. Workshop on ethical issues and justification for high-dose budget-limited procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2009;35:98-101.
52. Council of Europe. Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. European Treaty Series No. 164, Oviedo, Spain. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe; 1997 [cited 7 February 2010]. Available from: http://www.coe.int/t/dg3/ healthbioethic/Activities/01-Oviedo%20Convention/default-en.asp
53. Schreiner-Karoussou A. Review of existing issues and practices with respect to irradiation of patients and staff during pregnancy. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2008;129:299-302.
54. Schreiner-Karoussou A. A preliminary study of issues and practices concerning pregnancy and ionising radiation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2009;135:79-82.
55. Frush DR. Pediatric CT quality and dose: clinical perspective. In: Frush DR, Huda W, eds. From invisible to visible - the science and practice of X-ray imaging and radiation dose optimization. Refresher Syllabus. Oak Brook, IL: Radiological Society of North America; 2006.
56. Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation; Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies; National Research Council of the National Academies. Health Risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006 [cited 16 February 2010]. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record-id511340
57. Canadian Association of Radiologists. Diagnostic imaging referral guidelines. A guide for physicians. Quebec, Canada: Canadian Association of Radiologists; 2005.
58. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. Imaging guidelines. Perth, WA: Western Australian Department of Health; 2001 [cited 7 February 2010]. Available from: http://www.imagingpathways.health.wa.gov.au/ includes/index.html
59. Hong Kong College of Radiologists. Clinical referral guidelines. Hong Kong: Hong Kong College of Radiologists; 1999 [cited 7 February 2010]. Available from: http://www.hkcr.org/
60. Remedios D, McCoubrie P. Making the best use of clinical radiology services: a new approach to referral guidelines. Clin Radiol 2007;62:919-20.
61. Michie S, Johnston M. Changing clinical behaviour by making guidelines specific. BMJ 2004;328:343-5. (Pubitemid 38197860)
62. Department of Health. Imaging: 18 week patient pathway. London, UK: DH; 2010 [cited 7 February 2010]. Available from: http://www.18weeks.nhs.uk/Content. aspx?path=/achieve-and-sustain/Diagnostics/Imaging
63. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Report to the General Assembly. Annexe A: Medical Radiation Exposures. 2010 [accessed 25 Nov 2010]. Available from: http://www.unscear.org/ docs/reports/2008/09-86753-Report-2008-Annex-A.pdf
64. Gibbons RJ, Miller TD, Hodge D, Urban L, Araoz PA, Pellikka P, et al. Application of appropriateness criteria to stress single-photon emission computed tomography sestamibi studies and stress echocardiograms in an academic medical centre. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1283-9. (Pubitemid 351400897)
65. Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE, Dixon RL, Ferrari VA, Gomes AS, et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation 2009;119:1056-65.
66. Royal College of Radiologists Working Party. Influence of Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines on referral from general practice. BMJ 1993;306:110-11.
67. Oakeshott P, Kerry SM, Williams JE. Randomized controlled trial of the effect of the Royal College of Radiologists'guidelines on general practitioners' referrals for radiographic examination. Br J Gen Pract 1994;44:427-8.
68. Matowe L, Ramsay CR, Grimshaw JM, Gilbert FJ, Macleod MJ, Needham G. Effects of mailed dissemination of the Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines on general practitioner referrals for radiography: a time series analysis. Clin Radiol 2002;57:575-8. (Pubitemid 36113574)
69. Ramsay CR, Eccles M, Grimshaw JM, Steen N. Assessing the long-term effect of educational reminder messages on primary care radiology referrals. Clin Radiol 2003;58:319-21. (Pubitemid 36416976)
70. Moskowitz H, Sunshine J, Grossman D, Adams L, Gelinas L. The effect of imaging guidelines on the number and quality of outpatient radiographic examinations. Am J Radiol 2000;175:9-15. (Pubitemid 30415530)
71. Ratnapalan S, Bona N, Chandra K, Koren G. Physicians'perception of teratogenic risk associated with radiography and CT during early pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:1107-9. (Pubitemid 38525497)
72. Johnson K, Williams SC, Balogun M, Dhillon MS. Reducing unnecessary skull radiographs in children: a multidisciplinary audit. Clin Radiol 2004;59:616-20. (Pubitemid 38950077)
73. Clarke JC, Cranley K, Kelly BE, Bell K, Smith PHS. Provision of MRI can significantly reduce CT collective dose. Br J Radiol 2001;74:926-31. (Pubitemid 33064637)
74. Shaw CD. Measuring against clinical standards. Clin Chim Acta 2003;333:15-24.
75. Tabish SA. Clinical audit. JK Practitioner 2001;8:270-5. (Pubitemid 34223480)
76. Williams O. What is clinical audit? J R Coll Surg Eng 1996;78:406-11. (Pubitemid 26320774)
77. Triantopoulou C, Tsalafoutas I, Maniatis P, Papavdis D, Raios G, Siafas I, et al. Analysis of radiological examination request forms in conjunction with justification of X-ray exposures. Eur J Radiol 2005;53:306-11. (Pubitemid 40143594)
78. Mohammed M. Using statistical process control to improve the quality of health care. BMJ Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:243-5. (Pubitemid 39070887)
79. Spiegelhalter D. Funnel plots for institutional comparison. BMJ Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:390.