Comparison of rumen microorganism and digester sludge dominated anaerobic digestion processes for aquatic plants

Renewable Energy

Volumn 46, Issue , 2012, Pages 255-258

  Yue, Zheng Bo ^a,b   Wang, Jin ^a   Liu, Xiao Meng ^c   Yu, Han Qing ^b  

^a HEFEI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^c Anhui Academy of Environmental Science Research   (China)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Aquatic plant; Digester sludge; Rumen fluid; Steam explosion

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PROCESS; ANAEROBIC REACTOR; AQUATIC PLANTS; DIGESTER SLUDGE; PRE-TREATMENT; PRODUCT FORMATION; PRODUCT YIELDS; RUMEN FLUIDS; STEAM EXPLOSION; TOTAL SOLIDS;

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; METHANE; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

AQUATIC PLANT; BIOREACTOR; CELLULOSE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; FATTY ACID; INOCULATION; METHANE; MICROORGANISM; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SLUDGE; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

EID: 84860883755     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.03.030     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. DeBust T.A., Peterson J.E., Reddy K.R. Use of aquatic and terrestrial plants for removing phosphorus from dairy wastewaters. Ecol Eng 1995, 5:371-390.
2. Verma V.K., Singh Y.P., Rai J.P.N. Biogas production from plant biomass used for phytoremediation of industrial wastes. Bioresour Technol 2007, 8(8):1664-1669.
3. Gunnarsson C.C., Petersen C.M. Water hyacinths as a resource in agriculture and energy production: a literature review. Waste Manag 2007, 1:117-129.
4. Yue Z.B., Yu H.Q., Harada H., Li Y.Y. Optimization of anaerobic acidogenesis of an aquatic plant, Canna indica L., by rumen cultures. Water Res 2007, 41:2361-2370.
5. Mata-Alvarez J., Macé S., Llabrés P. Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes: an overview of research achievements and perspectives. Bioresour Technol 2000, 74:3-16.
6. Sonakya V., Raizada N., Dalhoff R., Wilderer P.A. Elucidation mechanism of organic acids production from organic matter (grass) using digested and partially digested cattle feed. Water Sci Technol 2003, 48(8):255-259.
7. O'Sullivan C.A., Burrell P.C., Clarke W.P., Blackall L.L. Comparison of cellulose solubilisation rates in rumen and landfill leachate inoculated reactors. Bioresour Technol 2006, 97(18):2356-2363.
8. Hu Z.H., Liu S.Y., Yue Z.B., Yan L.F., Yang M.T., YU H.Q. Microscale analysis of in vitro anaerobic degradation of lignocellulosic wastes by rumen microorganisms. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42(1):276-281.
9. Mu Y., Yu H.Q. Biological hydrogen production in a UASB reactor with granules I: physicochemical characteristics of hydrogen-producing granules. Biotechnol Bioeng 2006, 94(5):980-987.
10. APHA, AWWA, WEF Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 1995, American Public Health Association, Washington DC. 19th ed.
11. Goering H.K., Van Soest P.J. Forage fiber analysis: apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications. Agriculture handbook. Agriculture research service 1970, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, USA.
12. van Ginkel S., Sung S.W., Lay J.J. Biohydrogen production as a function of pH and substrate concentration. Environ Sci Technol 2001, 35:4726-4730.
13. Barnes S.P., Keller J. Cellulosic waste degradation by rumen-enhanced anaerobic digestion. Water Sci Technol 2003, 48(4):155-162.
14. Hu Z.H., Yu H.Q. Application of rumen microorganisms for enhanced anaerobic fermentation of corn stover. Process Biochem 2005, 40:2371-2377.
15. Kivaisi A.K., Eliapenda S. Application of Rumen microorganisms for enhanced degradation of bagasse and maize bran. Biomass Bioenergy 1995, 8(1):45-50.
16. Datta R. Acidogenic fermentation of corn stover. Biotechnol Bioeng 1981, 13:61-77.
17. Teghammar A., Yngvesson J., Lundin M., Taherzadeh M.J., Horváth I.S. Pretreatment of paper tube residuals for improved biogas production. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101(4):1206-1212.