Heterogeneous web data search using relevance-based on the fly data integration

WWW'12 - Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on World Wide Web

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 141-150

  Herzig, Daniel M ^a   Tran, Thanh ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Data integration; Rdf; Structured web data; Vertical search

Indexed keywords

DATA INTEGRATION; DATA SOURCE; FINE-GRAINED STRUCTURE; HYBRID APPROACH; KEYWORD SEARCH; ON THE FLIES; QUERY RESULTS; RDF; REAL WORLD DATA; RELEVANCE MODELS; SEARCH PROCESS; STRUCTURE INFORMATION; STRUCTURED DATA; STRUCTURED QUERIES; VERTICAL SEARCHES; WEB DATA;

QUERY PROCESSING; SEARCH ENGINES; VIRTUAL REALITY;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 84860844992     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2187836.2187856     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. W3C Recommendation 15 January 2008, SPARQL Query Language for RDF. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/.
2. R. Blanco, P. Mika, and S. Vigna. Effective and Effcient Entity Search in RDF data. In ISWC, pages 83-97, 2011.
3. A. Calì, D. Lembo, and R. Rosati. Query rewriting and answering under constraints in data integration systems. In IJCAI, pages 16-21, 2003.
4. S. Chaudhuri, B.-C. Chen, V. Ganti, and R. Kaushik. Example-driven Design of Effcient Record Matching Queries. In VLDB, pages 327-338, 2007.
5. G. Cheng and Y. Qu. Searching Linked Objects with Falcons: Approach, Implementation and Evaluation. Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst., 5(3):49-70, 2009.
6. C. Cleverdon. The CRANFIELD Tests on Index Langauge Devices. Aslib, 1967.
7. J. David. AROMA results for OAEI 2009. In Ontology Matching Workshop, ISWC, 2009.
8. A. Doan and A. Y. Halevy. Semantic Integration Research in the Database Community: A Brief Survey. AI Magazine, 26(1):83-94, 2005.
9. S. Duan, A. Fokoue, and K. Srinivas. One size does not fit all: Customizing Ontology Alignment Using User Feedback. In ISWC, pages 177-192, 2010.
10. S. Elbassuoni, M. Ramanath, and G. Weikum. Query Relaxation for Entity-Relationship Search. In ESWC, pages 62-76, 2011.
11. T. Heath and C. Bizer. Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space. Morgan & Claypool, 1st edition, 2011.
12. D. Herzig and T. Tran. One Query To Bind Them All. In COLD2011, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 782, 2011.
13. W. Hu and Y. Qu. Falcon-AO: A practical ontology matching system. J. Web Sem., 6(3):237-239, 2008.
14. V. Lavrenko and W. B. Croft. Relevance-based language models. In SIGIR, pages 120-127, 2001.
15. V. Lavrenko, X. Yi, and J. Allan. Information retrieval on empty fields. In HLT-NAACL, pages 89-96, 2007.
16. J. Madhavan, S. Cohen, X. L. Dong, A. Y. Halevy, S. R. Jeffery, D. Ko, and C. Yu. Web-scale data integration: You can afford to pay as you go. In CIDR, pages 342-350, 2007.
17. J. M. Ponte and W. B. Croft. A Language Modeling Approach to Information Retrieval. In SIGIR, pages 275-281, 1998.
18. J. Pound, P. Mika, and H. Zaragoza. Ad-hoc Object Retrieval in the Web of Data. In WWW, pages 771-780, 2010.
19. T. Tran, H. Wang, S. Rudolph, and P. Cimiano. Top-k Exploration of Query Candidates for Eficient Keyword Search on Graph-Shaped (RDF) Data. In ICDE, pages 405-416, 2009.
20. H. Wang, Q. Liu, T. Penin, L. Fu, L. Zhang, T. Tran, Y. Yu, and Y. Pan. Semplore: A scalable IR approach to search the Web of Data. J. Web Sem., 7(3):177-188, 2009.
21. H. Wang, T. Tran, P. Haase, T. Penin, Q. Liu1, L. Fu,, and Y. Yu. SearchWebDB: Searching the Billion Triples! In Semantic Web Challenge, ISWC, 2008. http://www.cs.vu.nl/~pmika/swc-2008/SearchWebDB-paper.pdf.
22. C. Zhai and J. D. Lafferty. A Risk Minimization Framework for Information Retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage., 42(1):31-55, 2006.
23. X. Zhou, J. Gaugaz, W.-T. Balke, and W. Nejdl. Query Relaxation Using Malleable Schemas. In SIGMOD Conference, pages 545-556, 2007.