A note on small composite designs for sequential experimentation

Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 109-117

  Nguyen, Nam Ky ^a   Lin, Dennis K J ^b,c  

^a VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Viet Nam)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c RENMIN UNIVERSITY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

Augmented pair design; Box Behnken design; Composite design; Orthogonal quadratic effect property; Response surface design; Two level design

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860821393     PISSN: 15598608     EISSN: 15598616     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15598608.2011.10412054     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Angelopoulos, P., Evangelaras, H., Koukouvinos, C., 2009. Small, balanced, efficient and near-rotatable central composite designs. J. of Statist. Planning and Inference, 139, 2010-2013.
2. Box, G.E.P., Behnken, D.W., 1960. Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics, 2, 455-477.
3. Box, G.E.P., Wilson, K.B., 1951. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 13, 1-45.
4. Draper, N.R., Lin, D.K.J., 1990. Small response surface designs. Technometrics, 32, 187-194.
5. Draper, N.R., Lin, D.K.J., 1996. Response Surface Designs. In Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 13, Ghosh, S. and Rao, C.R., (Editors), Elsevier Science, 343-375.
6. Draper, N.R., Pukelsheim, F., 1990. Another look at rotatability. Technometrics, 32, 195-202. (Pubitemid 20729559)
7. John, P.M.W. 1971. Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments. McMillan.
8. Morris, M.D., 2000. A class of three-level experimental designs for response surface. Technometrics, 42, 111-121.
9. Myers, R.H., Montgomery D.C., Anderson-Cook C.M. 2009. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments 3rd ed. Wiley.
10. Nguyen, N-K., Borkowski, J.J., 2008. New three-level response surface designs constructed from incomplete block designs. J. of Statist. Planning and Inference, 138, 294-305.
11. Angelopoulos, P., Evangelaras, H., Koukouvinos, C., 2009. Small, balanced, efficient and near-rotatable central composite designs. J. of Statist. Planning and Inference, 139, 2010-2013.
12. Box, G.E.P., Behnken, D.W., 1960. Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics, 2, 455-477.
13. Box, G.E.P., Wilson, K.B., 1951. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 13, 1-45.
14. Draper, N.R., Lin, D.K.J., 1990. Small response surface designs. Technometrics, 32, 187-194.
15. Draper, N.R., Lin, D.K.J., 1996. Response Surface Designs. In Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 13, Ghosh, S. and Rao, C.R., (Editors), Elsevier Science, 343-375.
16. Draper, N.R., Pukelsheim, F., 1990. Another look at rotatability. Technometrics, 32, 195-202. (Pubitemid 20729559)
17. John, P.M.W. 1971. Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments. McMillan.
18. Morris, M.D., 2000. A class of three-level experimental designs for response surface. Technometrics, 42, 111-121.
19. Myers, R.H., Montgomery D.C., Anderson-Cook C.M. 2009. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments 3rd ed. Wiley.
20. Nguyen, N-K., Borkowski, J.J., 2008. New three-level response surface designs constructed from incomplete block designs. J. of Statist. Planning and Inference, 138, 294-305.