SCOPUS 정보 검색 플랫폼

Pediatrics in Review

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 33-36

Obstetric conflict: When fetal and maternal interests are at odds

(1) Townsend, Susan F a

a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENEFICENCE; CANCER THERAPY; CESAREAN SECTION; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DYSTOCIA; EMOTIONALITY; ETHICAL DECISION MAKING; FEMINISM; FETUS DISTRESS; FETUS MORTALITY; FETUS OUTCOME; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HUMAN; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MATERNAL MORTALITY; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MORALITY; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PEDIATRICIAN; PHYSICIAN; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANT WOMAN; REVIEW; CONFLICT; ETHICS; FEMALE; FETUS; OBSTETRICS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PEDIATRICS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

CESAREAN SECTION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FETUS; HUMANS; OBSTETRICS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PEDIATRICS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

EID: 84860808317 PISSN: 01919601 EISSN: 15263347 Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1542/pir.33-1-33 Document Type: Review

Times cited : (15)

References (7)

1
- 79955389809
- Committee Opinion No. 390, December Available at: Accessed July 15, 2010
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Ethical decision making in obstetrics and gynecology. Committee Opinion No. 390, December 2007. Available at: http://www.acog.org/from-home/publications/ethics/co390.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2010
- (2007) Ethical Decision Making in Obstetrics and Gynecology

2
- 0003663231
- 5th ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press
- Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2001
- (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- Beauchamp, T.L.¹ Childress, J.F.²

3
- 0033783607
- Rethinking maternal-fetal conflict: Gender and equality in perinatal ethics
- Harris LH. Rethinking maternal-fetal conflict: gender and equality in perinatal ethics. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(5 pt 1): 786-791
- (2000) Obstet Gynecol , vol.96 , Issue.5 PART 1 , pp. 786-791
- Harris, L.H.¹

4
- 78149462629
- Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing
- Meredith S. Policing Pregnancy: The Law and Ethics of Obstetric Conflict. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing; 2005
- (2005) Policing Pregnancy: The Law and Ethics of Obstetric Conflict
- Meredith, S.¹

5
- 79955461060
- Committee Opinion No. 321, November Available at: Accessed May 6, 2010
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Maternal decision making, ethics, and the law. Committee Opinion No. 321, November 2005. Available at: http://www.acog.org/from-home/publications/ethics/co321.pdf. Accessed May 6, 2010
- (2005) Maternal Decision Making, Ethics, and the Law

6
- 0037344963
- Refusal of treatment during pregnancy
- DOI 10.1016/S0095-5108(02)00082-9
- Adams SF, Mahowald MB, Gallagher J. Refusal of treatment during pregnancy. Clin Perinatol. 2003;30(1):127-140, vii-viii (Pubitemid 36378723)
- (2003) Clinics in Perinatology , vol.30 , Issue.1 , pp. 127-140
- Adams, S.F.¹ Mahowald, M.B.² Gallagher, J.³

7
- 0012852030
- Cancer in pregnancy: Maternalfetal conflict
- Oduncu FS, Kimmig R, Hepp H, Emmerich B. Cancer in pregnancy: maternalfetal conflict. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2003; 129(3):133-146
- (2003) J Cancer Res Clin Oncol , vol.129 , Issue.3 , pp. 133-146
- Oduncu, F.S.¹ Kimmig, R.² Hepp, H.³ Emmerich, B.⁴

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.