The evolution of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 157-162

  Manchikanti, Laxmaiah ^a   Helm, Standiford ^b   Hirsch, Joshua A ^c  

^a PAIN MANAGEMENT CENTER OF PADUCAH   (United States)

^b Pacific Coast Pain Management Center   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FUNDING; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; LAW; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES;

ACADEMIES AND INSTITUTES; HUMANS; LEGISLATION, MEDICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84860785809     PISSN: 17598478     EISSN: 17598486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010114     Document Type: Note

References (29)

1. Manchikanti L, Falco FJ, Benyamin RM, et al. The impact of comparative effectiveness research on interventional pain management: evolution from Medicare Modernization act to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Pain Physician 2011;14:E249-82.
2. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. http://www.pcori.org (accessed 16 Aug 2011).
3. Dolinar R. Comparative effectiveness research: political science, not medical science. heartlander: health care news 14 April 2011. http://news.heartland.org/newspaper-article/comparativeeffectiveness-research- political-science-not-medicalscience (accessed 3 Aug 2011).
4. Manchikanti L, Falco FJ, Singh V, et al. The Independent Payment Advisory Board. Pain Physician 2011;14:E249-76.
5. Capretta JC. The Independent Payment Advisory Board and Health Care Prices Controls. Kaiser Health News, 2010. http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/ Columns/2010/May/050610Capretta.aspx (accessed 3 Aug 2011).
6. Eden J, Levit L, Berg A, et al, eds. Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research; Institute of Medicine. Finding what works in health care. Standards for systematic reviews. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.
7. Bonham AC, Solomon MZ. Moving comparative effectiveness research into practice: Implementation science and the role of academic medicine. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:1901-5.
8. Moffit RE. Doctors, patients, and the new Medicare provisions. Heritage Foundation, 2009. http://www.heritage.org/Research/Lecture/2010/12/Doctors- Patients-andthe-New-Medicare-Provisions (accessed 3 Aug 2011).
9. Congressional Budget Office. Budget options volume 1 health care. 2008. http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/99xx/doc9925/12-18-HealthOptions.pdf (accessed 3 Aug 2011).
10. Manchikanti L, Falco FJE, Boswell MV, et al. Facts, fallacies, and politics of comparative effectiveness research: Part 1. Basic considerations. Pain Physician 2010;13:E23-54.
11. Manchikanti L, Falco FJ, Boswell MV, et al. Facts, fallacies, and politics of comparative effectiveness research: Part 2. Implications for interventional pain management. Pain Physician 2010;13:E55-79.
12. Brown SR. Scurvy: How a surgeon, a mariner, and a gentleman solved the greatest medical mystery of the age of sail. New York: St Martin's Press, 2003.
13. Codman EA. A study in hospital efficiency. Privately printed, Boston, MA, Thomas Todd Co, 1916.
14. US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. http://www.ahrq.gov (accessed 3 Aug 2011).
15. H.R. 1. The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, P.L. 108-73, 2003.
16. Wilensky GR. Implementing the MMA. Healthc Financ Manage 2004;58:30-2.
17. Steinbrook R. Health care and the American recovery and reinvestment act. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1057-60.
18. Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman DM, et al, eds. Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research; Institute of Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.
19. Emanuel EJ. Healthcare guaranteed. New York: Public Affairs, 2008.
20. Partnership to Improve Patient Care. A procedural framework for the conduct of comparative clinical effectiveness research. 2010. http://www.improvepatientcare.org/sites/default/ files/CER-Procedure-PIPC- Whitepaper.pdf (accessed 3 Aug 2011).
21. Chou R, Huffman L. Guideline for the evaluation and management of low back pain: evidence review. Glenview, IL: American Pain Society, 2009. http://www.ampainsoc.org/pub/pdf/LBPEvidRev.pdf (accessed 3 Aug 2011).
22. Manchikanti L, Datta S, Derby R, et al. A critical review of the American Pain Society clinical practice guidelines for interventional techniques: Part 1. Diagnostic interventions. Pain Physician 2010;13: E141-74.
23. Manchikanti L, Datta S, Gupta S, et al. A critical review of the American Pain Society clinical practice guidelines for interventional techniques: Part 2. Therapeutic interventions. Pain Physician 2010;13: E215-64.
24. Cushner FD, Nett MP. Unanswered questions, unmet needs in venous thromboprophylaxis. Orthpedics 2009;32:62-6.
25. Manchikanti L, Boswell MV, Singh V, et al. Comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2009;12:699-802.
26. Lo B, Field MJ, eds. Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, 2009.
27. DuVal G, Clarridge B, Gensler G, et al. A national survey of U.S. internists' experiences with ethical dilemmas and ethics consultation. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:251-8. (Pubitemid 38388935)
28. Health Technology Assessment, Washington State Health Care Authority. Spinal injections, updated final evidence report. Spectrum Research, Inc, 2011. http://www.hta.hca.wa.gov/documents/updated-final-report-spinal-injections-0310- 1.pdf.
29. Letter to Robin Hashimoto, Washington State Health Care Authority, from American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians RE Health Technology Assessment for Spinal Injections, 24 Nov 2010.