The non-linear response of a muscle in transverse compression: Assessment of geometry influence using a finite element model

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 13-21

  Gras, Laure Lise ^a   Mitton, David ^a   Crevier Denoix, Nathalie ^b   Laporte, Sébastien ^a  

^a ARTS ET MÉTIERS PARISTECH   (France)

^b ECOLE NATIONALE VÉTÉRINAIRE D ALFORT   (France)

Author keywords

biomechanics; finite element modelling; geometry; identification; muscle; quasi static compression

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICAL RESPONSE; CONSTITUTIVE LAW; FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; IDENTIFICATION OF THE PARAMETERS; INVERSE METHODS; LINEAR ELASTIC; MULTI VARIATE ANALYSIS; MUSCLE MODELS; MUSCLE RESPONSE; NON-LINEAR RESPONSE; PARAMETRIC FINITE ELEMENTS; PARAMETRIC MODELS; QUASI-STATIC COMPRESSION; SUBJECT-SPECIFIC; TRANSVERSE COMPRESSION; YOUNG'S MODULUS;

BIOMECHANICS; COMPRESSION TESTING; ELASTIC MODULI; GEOMETRY; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); INVERSE PROBLEMS;

MUSCLE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOG; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HISTOLOGY; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY; SKELETAL MUSCLE; TENSILE STRENGTH; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANIMALS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOGS; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 84860782444     PISSN: 10255842     EISSN: 14768259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2011.564162     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aimedieu P, Mitton D, Faure JP, Denninger L, Lavaste F. 2003. Dynamic stiffness and damping of porcine muscle specimens. Med Eng Phys. 25(9):795-799.
2. Behr M, Arnoux P-J, Serre T, Thollon L, Brunet C. 2006. Tonic finite element model of the lower limb. J Biomech Eng. 128(2):223-228.
3. Blemker SS, Delp SL. 2006. Rectus femoris and vastus intermedius fiber excursions predicted by three-dimensional muscle models. J Biomech. 39(8):1383-1391.
4. Blemker SS, Pinsky PM, Delp SL. 2005. A 3D model of muscle reveals the causes of nonuniform strains in the biceps brachii. J Biomech. 38(4):657-665.
5. Bol M, Reese S. 2008. Micromechanical modelling of skeletal muscles based on the finite element method. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 11(5):489-504.
6. Bosboom EM, Hesselink MK, Oomens CW, Bouten CV, Drost MR, Baaijens FP. 2001. Passive transverse mechanical properties of skeletal muscle under in vivo compression. J Biomech. 34(10):1365-1368.
7. Chawla A, Mukherjee S, Karthikeyan B. 2009. Characterization of human passive muscles for impact loads using genetic algorithm and inverse finite element methods. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 8(1):67-76.
8. Davis J, Kaufman KR, Lieber RL. 2003. Correlation between active and passive isometric force and intramuscular pressure in the isolated rabbit tibialis anterior muscle. J Biomech. 36:505-512.
9. Dhaliwal TS, Beillas P, Chou CC, Prasad P, Yang KH, King AI. 2002. Structural response of lower leg muscles in compression: a low impact energy study employing volunteers, cadavers and the hybrid III. Stapp Car Crash J. 46:229-243.
10. Gao Y, Waas AM, Faulkner JA, Kostrominova TY, Wineman AS. 2008. Micromechanical modeling of the epimysium of the skeletal muscles. J Biomech. 41(1):1-10.
11. Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Macé E, Montaldo G, Fink M, Tanter M. 2010. Viscoelastic and anisotropic mechanical properties of in vivo muscle tissue assessed by supersonic shear imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 36(5):789-801.
12. Gottsauner-Wolf F, Grabowski JJ, Chao EY, An KN. 1995. Effects of freeze/thawconditioning on the tensile properties and failure mode of bone-muscle-bone units: a biomechanical and histological study in dogs. J Orthop Res. 13(1):90-95.
13. Hedenstierna S, Halldin P, Brolin K. 2008. Evaluation of a combination of continuum and truss finite elements in a model of passive and active muscle tissue. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 11(6):627-639.
14. Johansson T, Meier P, Blickhan R. 2000. A finite-element model for the mechanical analysis of skeletal muscles. J Theor Biol. 206(1):131-149.
15. Jolivet E, Daguet E, Pomero V, Bonneau D, Laredo JD, Skalli W. 2008. Volumic patient-specific reconstruction of muscular system based on a reduced dataset of medical images. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 11(3):281-290.
16. Klatt D, Papazoglou S, Braun J, Sack I. 2010. Viscoelasticitybased MR elastography of skeletal muscle. Phys Med Biol. 55(21):6445-6459.
17. Linder-Ganz E, Gefen A. 2004. Mechanical compressioninduced pressure sores in rat hindlimb: muscle stiffness, histology, and computational models. J Appl Physiol. 96: 2034-2049.
18. Martins J, Pires E, Salvado R, Dinis P. 1998. A numerical model of passive and active behavior of skeletal muscles. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 151:419-433.
19. McElhaney JH. 1966. Dynamic response of bone and muscle tissue. J Appl Physiol. 21(4):1231-1236.
20. Monti RJ, Roy RR, Zhong H, Edgerton VR. 2003. Mechanical properties of rat soleus aponeurosis and tendon during variable recruitment in situ. J Exp Biol. 206(Pt 19):3437-3445.
21. Moss RL, Halpern W. 1977. Elastic and viscous properties of resting frog skeletal muscle. Biophys J. 17:213-228.
22. Myers BS, Woolley CT, Slotter TL, Garrett WE, Best TM. 1998. The influence of strain rate on the passive and stimulated engineering stress-large strain behavior of the rabbit tibialis anterior muscle. J Biomech Eng. 120(1):126-132.
23. Nordez A, Cornu C, McNair P. 2006. Acute effects of static stretching on passive stiffness of the hamstring muscles calculated using different mathematical models. Clin Biomech. 21:755-760.
24. Oomens CWJ, Maenhout M, van Oijen CH, Drost MR, Baaijens FP. 2003. Finite element modelling of contracting skeletal muscle. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci. 358(1437):1453-1460.
25. Palevski A, Glaich I, Portnoy S, Linder-Ganz E, Gefen A. 2006. Stress relaxation of porcine gluteus muscle subjected to sudden transverse deformation as related to pressure sore modeling. J Biomech Eng. 128(5):782-787.
26. Ralis ZA. 1989. Freezing of orthopaedic specimens before mechanical testing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 71(1):55-57.
27. Scott SH, Loeb GE. 1995. Mechanical properties of aponeurosis and tendon of the cat soleus muscle during whole-muscle isometric contractions. J Morphol. 224(1):73-86.
28. Sligtenhorst CV, Cronin DS, Brodland GW. 2006. High strain rate compressive properties of bovine muscle tissue determined using a split Hopkinson bar apparatus. J Biomech. 39(10): 1852-1858.
29. Song B, Chen W, Ge Y, Weerasooriya T. 2007. Dynamic and quasi-static compressive response of porcine muscle. J Biomech. 40(13):2999-3005.
30. Soni A, Chawla A, Mukherjee S. 2009. Response of tonic lower limb FE model in various real life car-pedestrian impact configurations: a parametric study for standing posture. Int J Veh Saf. 4(1):14-28.
31. Tang CY, Zhang G, Tsui CP. 2009. A 3D skeletal muscle model coupled with active contraction of muscle fibres and hyperelastic behaviour. J Biomech. 42:865-872.
32. Untaroiu C, Darvish K, Crandall J, Deng B, Wang JT. 2005. A finite element model of the lower limb for simulating pedestrian impacts. Stapp Car Crash J. 49:157-181.
33. Van Ee CA, Chasse AL, Myers BS. 2000. Quantifying skeletal muscle properties in cadaveric test specimens: effects of mechanical loading, postmortem time, and freezer storage. J Biomech Eng. 122(1):9-14.
34. Van Loocke M, Lyons CG, Simms CK. 2006. A validated model of passive muscle in compression. J Biomech. 39(16): 2999-3009.
35. Van Loocke M, Lyons CG, Simms CK. 2008. Viscoelastic properties of passive skeletal muscle in compression: stress-relaxation behaviour and constitutive modelling. J Biomech. 41:1555-1566.
36. Weiss JA, Makerc BN, Govindjeed S. 1996. Finite element implementation of incompressible, transversely isotropic hyperelasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 135: 107-128.