J-pouch vs side-to-end coloanal anastomosis after preoperative radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: A multicentre randomized trial

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 705-713

  Doeksen, A ^a,b   Bakx, R ^a   Vincent, A ^c   van Tets, W F ^b   Sprangers, M A G ^a   Gerhards, M F ^d   Bemelman, W A ^a   van Lanschot, J J B ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

^c ANTONI VAN LEEUWENHOEK HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^d Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis ^*  (Netherlands)

^e ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Colonic pouch; Rectal cancer; Side to end anastomosis

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURGERY; COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCONTINENCE; INTESTINE FUNCTION; J POUCH COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; RECTUM BIOPSY; RECTUM CARCINOMA; SHORT FORM 36; SIDE TO END COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANAL CANAL; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; CARCINOMA; COLON; COLONIC POUCHES; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; ORGAN SPARING TREATMENTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84860780748     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02725.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Wong RK, Tandan V, de Silva S et al. Pre-operative radiotherapy and curative surgery for the management of localized rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; CD 002102.
2. Ortiz H, Armendariz P. Anterior resection: do the patients perceive any clinical benefit? Int J Colorectal Dis 1996; 11: 191-5.
3. Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Finan PJ et al. Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum: myth or reality? Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 411-8.
4. Hida J, Yoshifuji T, Tokoro T et al. Comparison of long-term functional results of colonic J-pouch and straight anastomosis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a five-year follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1578-85.
5. Heriot AG, Tekkis PP, Constantinides V et al. Meta-analysis of colonic reservoirs versus straight coloanal anastomosis after anterior resection. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 19-32.
6. Brown CJ, Fenech DS, McLeod RS. Reconstructive techniques after rectal resection for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; CD006040.
7. Hardcastle JD, Parks AG. A study of anal incontinence and some principles of surgical treatment. Proc R Soc Med 1970; 63(Suppl. 1): 116-8.
8. Bakx R, Sprangers MA, Oort FJ et al. Development and validation of a colorectal functional outcome questionnaire. Int J Colorect Dis 2005; 20: 126-36.
9. Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Aaronson NK. The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35: 238-47.
10. Sprangers MA. Response-shift bias: a challenge to the assessment of patients' quality of life in cancer clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rev 1996; 22(Suppl A): 55-62.
11. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-83.
12. Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD et al. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1055-68.
13. Campbell MK, Elbourne DE, Altman DG. CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ 2004; 328: 702-8.
14. Bakx R, Emous M, Legemate DA et al. Categorization of major and minor complications in the treatment of patients with respectable rectal cancer using short-term pre-operative radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision: a Delphi round. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8: 302-8.
15. Bakx R, Doeksen A, Slors JF et al. Neorectal irritability after short-term preoperative radiotherapy and surgical resection for rectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 133-41.
16. Furst A, Burghofer K, Hutzel L et al. Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 660-7.
17. Huber FT, Herter B, Siewert JR. Colonic pouch vs. side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 896-902.
18. Iizuka I, Koda K, Seike K et al. Defecatory malfunction caused by motility disorder of the neorectum after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 2004; 188: 176-80.
19. Jiang JK, Yang SH, Lin JK. Transabdominal anastomosis after low anterior resection: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term results between side-to-end anastomosis and colonic J-pouch. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 2100-8.
20. Machado M, Nygren J, Goldman S et al. Similar outcome after colonic pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 214-20.
21. Marijnen CA, Kapiteijn E, van de Velde CJ et al. Acute side effects and complications after short-term preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 817-25.
22. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 1718-26.
23. Fazio VW, Mantyh CR, Hull TL. Colonic 'coloplasty': novel technique to enhance low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1448-50.