The influence of sociodemographic factors and hospital characteristics on the method of breast reconstruction, including microsurgery: A U.S. population-based study

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 129, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1071-1079

  Albornoz, Claudia R ^a   Bach, Peter B ^a   Pusic, Andrea L ^a   McCarthy, Colleen M ^a   Mehrara, Babak J ^a   Disa, Joseph J ^a   Cordeiro, Peter G ^a   Matros, Evan ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST TUMOR; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; RACE; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; SURGICAL FLAPS; UNITED STATES;

AGE FACTORS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMAPLASTY; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SURGICAL FLAPS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84860778207     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a29c5     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Blondeel N, Vanderstraeten GG, Monstrey SJ, et al. The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1997;50: 322-330. (Pubitemid 27312141)
2. Bottero L, Lefaucheur JP, Fadhul S, Raulo Y, Collins ED, Lantieri L. Electromyographic assessment of rectus abdominis muscle function after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:156-161. (Pubitemid 39202022)
3. Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Adesiyun T, et al. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1585-1595.
4. Damen TH, Timman R, Kunst EH, et al. High satisfaction rates in women after DIEP flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:93-100.
5. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277-300.
6. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HCUP). Welcome to HCUPnet. Available at: http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov/. Accessed February 1, 2011.
7. Alderman AK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD. Use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy following the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act. JAMA 2006;295:387-388. (Pubitemid 43144974)
8. Reuben BC, Manwaring J, Neumayer LA. Recent trends and predictors in immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy in the United States. Am J Surg. 2009;198:237-243.
9. Wilkins EG, Alderman AK. Breast reconstruction practices in North America: Current trends and future priorities. Semin Plast Surg. 2004;18:149-155.
10. Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Janz NK, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction: Results from a population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5325-5330.
11. Alderman AK, McMahon L Jr, Wilkins EG. The national utilization of immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction and the effect of sociodemographic factors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:695-703; discussion 704-705. (Pubitemid 36182312)
12. Polednak AP. Geographic variation in postmastectomy breast reconstruction rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:298-301. (Pubitemid 30640447)
13. Tseng JF, Kronowitz SJ, Sun CC, et al. The effect of ethnicity on immediate reconstruction rates after mastectomy for breast cancer. Cancer 2004;101:1514-1523. (Pubitemid 39318896)
14. Christian CK, Niland J, Edge SB, et al. A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction: A study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Ann Surg. 2006;243:241-249. (Pubitemid 43185444)
15. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HCUP). Overview of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Available at: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp. Accessed February 1, 2011.
16. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HCUP). NIS description of data elements. Available at: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq. gov/db/vars/hosp-bedsize/nisnote.jsp. Accessed June 8, 2011.
17. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HCUP). NIS trends supplemental files. Available at: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/nistrends.jsp. Accessed April 1, 2011.
18. Lentol J. Information and access to breast reconstructive surgery law. A. 10094-B/S.6993-B; Chapter 354; Health. In: New York State Assembly Committee on Codes: Annual Report 2010. Available at: http://assembly.state.ny.us/comm/ Codes/2010Annual/index.pdf. Accessed July 1, 2011.
19. Hartocollis A. Before breast is removed, a discussion on options. The New York Times. August 18, 2010:A23. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/ 19/nyregion/19surgery.html. Accessed June 27, 2011.
20. Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1005-1014.
21. Niemeyer M, Paepke S, Schmid R, Plattner B, Müller D, Kiechle M. Extended indications for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Breast J. 2011;17:296-299.
22. Boneti C, Yuen J, Santiago C, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:686-693; discussion 693-695.
23. Matros E, Yueh JH, Bar-Meir ED, Slavin SA, Tobias AM, Lee BT. Sociodemographics, referral patterns, and Internet use for decision-making in microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1087-1094.
24. Bloom B, Cohen RA, Freeman G. Summary health statistics for U.S. children: National Health Interview Survey, 2009. Vital Health Stat 10 2010;247:1-82.
25. Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, et al. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship period. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1-8.
26. Roostaeian J, Pavone L, Da Lio A, Lipa J, Festekjian J, Crisera C. Immediate placement of implants in breast reconstruction: Patient selection and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1407-1416.
27. Barry M, Kell MR. Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127:15-22.
28. Berry T, Brooks S, Sydow N, et al. Complication rates of radiation on tissue expander and autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(Suppl 3):202-210.
29. Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Bar-Meir ED, et al. Impact of regional referral centers for microsurgical breast reconstruction: The New England perforator flap program experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:246-254.
30. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA 2010;303:235-241.
31. Frieden TR; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Forward: CDC Health Disparities and Inequalities Report. United States, 2011. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011; 60(Suppl):1-2.
32. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HCUP). Statistical brief #95: Public Hospitals in the United States, 2008. Available at: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/ statbriefs/sb95.pdf. Accessed June 8, 2011.
33. Alderman AK, Atisha D, Streu R, et al. Patterns and correlates of postmastectomy breast reconstruction by U.S. plastic surgeons: Results from a national survey. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1796-1803.
34. Fosnot J, Fischer JP, Smartt JM Jr, et al. Does previous chest wall irradiation increase vascular complications in free autologous breast reconstruction? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:496-504.
35. Alderman AK, Storey AF, Nair NS, Chung KC. Financial impact of breast reconstruction on an academic surgical practice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1408-1413.