Does the magnetic anal sphincter device compare favourably with sacral nerve stimulation in the management of faecal incontinence?

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Wong, M T C ^a   Meurette, G ^a   Wyart, V ^a   Lehur, P A ^a  

^a NANTES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Faecal incontinence; Magnetic anal sphincter; Quality of life; Results; Sacral nerve stimulation; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANUS SPHINCTER DISORDER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEVICE REMOVAL; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM HEMORRHAGE; DISEASE DURATION; FECES IMPACTION; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MAGNETIC ANAL SPHINCTER; MEDICAL DEVICE; MORBIDITY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULSE GENERATOR; QUALITY OF LIFE; SACRAL NERVE STIMULATION;

ADULT; AGED; ANAL CANAL; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATORS; LENGTH OF STAY; LUMBOSACRAL PLEXUS; MAGNETS; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84860740786     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02995.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Wexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a 120-patient prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg 2010; 251: 441-9.
2. Jarret M, Mowatt G, Glazener CMA et al. Systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1559-69.
3. Maeda Y, Lundby L, Buntzen S, Laurberg S. Suboptimal outcome following sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2010; 98: 140-7.
4. Lehur PA, MacNevin S, Buntzen S et al. Magnetic anal sphincter augmentation for the treatment of fecal incontinence: a preliminary report from a feasibility study. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53: 1604-10.
5. Wong MT, Meurette G, Stangherlin P, Lehur PA. The magnetic anal sphincter versus the artificial bowel sphincter: a comparison of 2 treatments for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 773-9.
6. Meurette G, Torre ML, Regenet N et al. Value of sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of severe faecal incontinence: a comparison to the artificial bowel sphincter. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11: 631-5.
7. Leroi AM, Parc Y, Lehur PA et al. Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Results of a multicenter, double-blind crossover study. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 662-9.
8. Jorge JMN, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 77-97.
9. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al. Fecal incontinence quality of life scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 9-16.
10. Bonavina L, Saino GI, Bona D et al. Magnetic augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter: results of a feasibility clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 2133-40.
11. Ganz RA, Gostout CJ, Grudem J et al. Use of a magnetic sphincter for the treatment of GERD: a feasibility study. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 287-94.
12. Wong MT, Meurette G, Rodat F, Regenet N, Wyart V, Lehur PA. Outcome and management of patients who failed sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 425-32.
13. Melenhorst J, Koch SM, Uludag O, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG. Sacral neuromodulation in patients with faecal incontinence: results of the first 100 permanent implantations. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9: 725-30.