Medical physics staffing for radiation oncology: A decade of experience in Ontario, Canada

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 93-110

  Battista, Jerry J ^a   Clark, Brenda G ^b   Patterson, Michael S ^c   Beaulieu, Luc ^d   Sharpe, Michael B ^e   Schreiner, L John ^f   MacPherson, Miller S ^e   Dyk, Jacob Van ^a  

^a LONDON REGIONAL CANCER PROGRAM   (Canada)

^b OTTAWA REGIONAL CANCER CENTRE   (Canada)

^c JURAVINSKI CANCER CENTRE   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^f Cancer Centre of South Eastern Ontario   (Canada)

Author keywords

Medical physics; Radiation oncology; Staffing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860728495     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15269914     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i1.3704     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Inter-Society Council for Radiation Oncology. Radiation oncology in integrated cancer management (Blue Book). 1991.
2. Dunscombe P. Towards a national standard for medical physics staffing in Canada. Kanata, ON: Canadian Organisation of Medical Physicists; 1993.
3. American College of Medical Physics. The Abt study of medical physicist work values for radiation oncology physics services: round II. Cambridge, MA: ACMP; 2003.
4. American College of Medical Physics. The Abt study of medical physicist work values for radiation oncology physics services: round III. Cambridge, MA: ACMP; 2008.
5. American College of Medical Physics. The Abt study of medical physics work values for radiation oncology physics services. Cambridge, MA: ACMP; 1995.
6. Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. IPEM recommendations for the provision of a physics service to radiotherapy. London, England: IPEM; 2009. Available from: http://www.ipem.ac.uk/SiteCollectionDocuments/Publications/Policy%20Statements/Recommendations%20for%20Prov%20of%20Phys%20Serv%20to%20RT.pdf
7. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. The cancer workforce scoping study: a report from the front lines of Canada's cancer control workforce. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Partnership Against Cancer; 2010. Available from: http://www.cancerview.ca/portal/server.pt/community/health_human_resources/460/cancer_workforce_scoping_study/5305
8. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the conduct of isocentric radiotherapy at North Staffordshire Royal Infirmary. Birmingham, England: West Midlands Health Authority; 1994.
9. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the incident in the radiotherapy department. Exeter, England: Exeter Health Authority; 1988.
10. British Institute of Radiology, Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, National Patient Safety Agency, Society and College of Radiographers, and The Royal College of Radiologists. Towards safer radiotherapy. 2008. Available from: http://www.rcr.ac.uk/publications.aspx?PageID=149&PublicationID=281
11. Dunscombe P, Lau H, Silverthorne S. The Ottawa orthovoltage incident: report of the panel of experts convened by Cancer Care Ontario. 2008. Available from: http://www.cancercare.on.ca/cms/one.aspx?pageId=34940
12. Scottish Ministers for The Ionising Radiation Regulations. Unintended overexposure of patient Lisa Norris during radiotherapy treatment at the Beatson Oncology Centre, Glasgow. 2006. Available from: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/153082/0041158.pdf
13. World Health Organization. Radiotherapy risk profile. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2008. Available from: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/activities/technical/radiotherapy_risk_profile.pdf
14. Boadu M and Rehani MM. Unintended exposure in radiotherapy: identification of prominent causes. Radiother Oncol. 2009;93(3):609-17.
15. International Atomic Energy Agency. Lessons learned from accidental exposures in radiotherapy. Safety Re-ports Series No. 17. Vienna: IAEA; 2000. Available from: http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1084_web.pdf
16. International Atomic Energy Agency. Investigation of an accidental exposure of radiotherapy patients in Panama. Vienna: IAEA; 2001. Available from: http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1114_scr.pdf
17. Ortiz Lopez P, Cosset J-M, Dunscombe P, et al. Preventing accidental exposures from new external beam radiation therapy technologies. ICRP Publication 112. Oxford (U.K.): Pergamon Press; 2009.
18. Bogdanich W. Radiation offers new cures, and ways to do harm. New York Times. 2010 23-27 January: Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/24/health/24radiation.html
19. Mills MD, Thornewill J, Esterhay RJ. Future trends in the supply and demand for radiation oncology physicists. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010;11(2):209-19.
20. Klein EE. A grid to facilitate physics staffing justification. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010;11(1):2987.
21. Bentzen SM, Heeren G, Cottier B, et al. Towards evidence-based guidelines for radiotherapy infrastructure and staffing needs in Europe: the ESTRO QUARTS project. Radiother Oncol. 2005;75(3):355-65.
22. Slotman BJ, Cottier B, Bentzen SM, Heeren G, Lievens Y, van den Bogaert W. Overview of national guide-lines for infrastructure and staffing of radiotherapy. ESTRO-QUARTS: work package 1. Radiother Oncol. 2005;75(3):349-54.
23. Round WH, Tay YK, Ng KH, et al. AFOMP Policy Statement No. 2: recommended clinical radiation oncology medical physicist staffing levels in AFOMP countries. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2010;33(1):7-10.
24. Oliver L, Fitchew R, Drew J. Requirements for radiation oncology physics in Australia and New Zealand. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2001;24(1):1-18.
25. Mackillop WJ, Groome PA, Zhang-Solomons J, et al. Does a centralized radiotherapy system provide adequate access to care? J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(3):1261-71.
26. Mills MD. Analysis and practical use: the Abt study of medical physicist work values for radiation oncology physics services-round II. J Am Coll Radiol. 2005;2(9):782-89.
27. Langelier M and Forte G. Workforce study of medical physicists in the U.S. Rensselaer, NY: Center for Health Workforce Studies; 2010. Available from: http://www/aapm/org
28. Patterson MS and Van Dyk J. Recommended minimum staffing levels for medical physics departments in Ontario Cancer Centres. Toronto, ON: Ontario Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation; 1989.
29. Holmberg O and McClean B. A method of predicting workload and staffing level for radiotherapy treatment planning as plan complexity changes. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2003;15(6):359-63.
30. Government of Ontario. Geography of Ontario-It's a Big Place. 2010. Available from: http://www.ontario.ca/en/about_ontario/EC001032?openNav=geography
31. Cancer Care Ontario. Cancer Plan Ontario 2011-2015. 2010. Available from: http://ocp.cancercare.on.ca
32. The Future of Radiation Treatment in the 21st Century. Toronto, Ontario: Cancer Care Ontario, 2007. Available from: https://www.cancercare.on.ca/common/pages/UserFile.aspx?fileId=13768
33. Zhang-Salomons J and Mackillop WJ. Estimating the lifetime utilization rate of radiotherapy in cancer patients: the Multicohort Current Utilization Table (MCUT) method. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008;92(1):99-108.
34. Delaney G, Jacob S, Featherstone C, Barton M. The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Cancer. 2005;104(6):1129-37.
35. Round WH. A 2009 survey of the Australasian clinical medical physics and biomedical engineering workforce. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2010;33(2):153-62.
36. Round WH. A survey of the Australasian clinical medical physics and biomedical engineering workforce. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2007;30(1):13-24.
37. Cancer Care Ontario. Clinical physics residency in radiation oncology. Available from: http://www.cancercare.on.ca/cms/one.aspx?pageId=9352
38. Podgorsak EB. Radiotherapy services in Canada: equipment and staff workloads. Cur Oncol. 1997;5:208-15.
39. Whitton A, Warde P, Sharpe M, et al. Organisational standards for the delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in Ontario. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2009;21(3):192-203.
40. Beaulieu L, Frenière N, Gélinas D, et al. Planification de la main-d'oeuvre en physique médicale au Québec incluant un modèle prédictif des effectifs. Montreal, PQ: Association québécoise des physiciens médicaux cliniques; 2007.
41. Mackillop WJ, Zhou S, Groome P, et al. Changes in the use of radiotherapy in Ontario 1984-1995. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44(2):355-62.
42. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Profile of radiation oncology departments calendar year 2004. Madison (WI): Medical Physics Publishing; 2004. Available from: www.aapm.org
43. Huq MS, Sohn, J. W. Over the foreseeable future, the growth in technical complexity of radiation therapy will continue to drive the demand for more medical physicists. Med Phys. 2004;31(11):2939-41.
44. Cotter GW and Parsai EI. Red Book guidelines for the ACRO practice accreditation program. Bethesda, MD: American College of Radiation Oncology; 2009. Available from: http://www.acro.org/Accreditation/index.cfm
45. American College of Radiology. Radiation oncology accreditation program requirements. Bethesda, MD: American College of Radiology; 2010. Available from: http://www.acr.org/accreditation.aspx