When are Forest Visits Valued the Most? An Analysis of the Seasonal Demand for Forest Recreation in Poland

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 249-264

  Bartczak, Anna ^a   Englin, Jeffrey ^b   Pang, Arwin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c FENG CHIA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Exponential distribution; Forest visitation; Poisson distribution; Seasonal demand; Travel cost method

Indexed keywords

POISSON DISTRIBUTION;

EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTIONS; FOREST VISITATION; SEASONAL ANALYSIS; SEASONAL DEMANDS; SEASONAL FLUCTUATIONS; SOCIAL BENEFITS; TEMPORAL CHANGE; TRAVEL COST METHOD;

FORESTRY;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEMAND ANALYSIS; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; POISSON RATIO; RECREATIONAL MANAGEMENT; SEASONAL VARIATION; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

FORESTS; METEOROLOGY; POISSON RATIO; POLAND; RECREATION;

POLAND;

EID: 84860714569     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-011-9527-1     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bartczak A, Lindhjem H, Navrud S, Zandersen M, Zylicz T (2008) Valuing forest recreation on the national level in a transition economy: the case of Poland. For Policy Econ 10: 467-472.
2. Brainard J, Bateman I, Lovett A (2001) Modelling demand for recreation in English woodlands. Forestry 74(5): 423-438.
3. Burt O, Brewer D (1971) Estimation of the net social benefits from outdoor recreation. Econometrica 39: 813-827.
4. Croitoru L (2007) How much are Mediterranean forests worth. For Policy Econ 9: 536-545.
5. Englin J, Nalle L (2005) Continuous endogenously stratified and truncated models. Paper presented at the methodological developments in revealed preference modeling for non-Market Valuation session at the American Association of agricultural economist's meeting in Providence, Rhode Island, July 2005.
6. Englin J, Lambert D (1995) Measuring angling quality in count data models of recreational fishing: a non-nested test of three approaches. Environ Resour Econ 6: 389-399.
7. Englin J, Shonkwiler JS (1995a) Estimating social welfare using count data models: an application to long-run recreation demand under conditions of endogenous stratification and truncation. Rev Econ Stat 77(1): 104-122.
8. Englin J, Shonkwiler JS (1995b) Modelling recreation demand in the presence of unobservable travel costs: toward a travel price model. J Environ Econ Manage 29: 368-377.
9. Englin J, Boxall P, Watson D (1998) Modelling recreation demand in a Poisson system of equations: an analysis of the impact of international exchange rates. Am J Agric Econ 80: 255-263.
10. Glowny Urzad Statystyczny, GUS (2009) Ochrona Srodowiska 2009, Warsaw.
11. Scarpa R, Chilton SM, Hutchinson WG, Buongiorno J (2000) Valuing the recreational benefits from the creation of nature reserves in Irish forests. Ecol Econ 33(2): 237-250.
12. Shaw D (1988) On-site samples' regression: problems of non-negative integers, truncation and endogenous stratification. J Econ 37: 211-223.
13. Von Haefen RH (2002) A complete characterization of the linear, log-linear, and semi-log incomplete demand system models. J Agric Resour Econ 27(2): 281-319.
14. Vuong Q (1989) Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and nonnested hypotheses. Econometrica 57: 307-333.
15. Zandersen M, Tol RSJ (2009) A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe. J For Econ 15: 109-130.