Mechanical variables affecting balloon kyphoplasty outcome - a finite element study

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 211-220

  Dabirrahmani, Danè ^a,c,d   Becker, Stephan ^a,b   Hogg, Michael ^a,d   Appleyard, Richard ^a,c   Baroude, Gamal ^e   Gillies, Mark ^a,c,d  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Vienna Speising Orthopaedic Hospital   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Balloon kyphoplasty; Bone cement; Finite element analysis; Vertebroplasty

Indexed keywords

FE MODEL; FINITE ELEMENTS; FINITE-ELEMENT STUDY; KYPHOPLASTY; LOAD TRANSFER; LUMBAR SPINES; NUMERICAL MODELLING; OSTEOPOROTIC; VERTEBRAL FRACTURES; VERTEBROPLASTY;

BALLOONS; BONE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FRACTURE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; RESTORATION; STRESS CONCENTRATION; THERMOELECTRICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

BONE CEMENT;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INJURY; KYPHOPLASTY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SHEAR STRENGTH; SPINE FRACTURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADHESIVENESS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; KYPHOPLASTY; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SHEAR STRENGTH; SPINAL FRACTURES; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84860708365     PISSN: 10255842     EISSN: 14768259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2010.522183     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Baroud G, Bohner M. 2006. Biomechanical impact of vertebroplasty: postoperative biomechanics of vertebroplasty. Review. Joint Bone Spine. 73:144-150.
2. Baroud G, Nemes J, Heini P, Steffen T. 2003. Load shift of the intervertebral disc after a vertebroplasty: a finite-element study. Eur Spine J. 12(4):421-426. Epub 2003 Apr 1.
3. Barr JD, Barr MS, Lemley TJ, McCann RM. 2000. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization. Spine. 25(8):923-928.
4. Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Jasper LE, Deramon H. 2001. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty: the effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior. Spine. 26(14):1537-1541.
5. Berlemann U, Ferguson SJ, Nolte LP, Heini PF. 2002. Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty. A biomechanical investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 84(5):748-752.
6. Berlemann U, Hulme P, Schwarzenbach O. 2008. Results in kyphoplasty. Risks and complications. In: Becker S, Ogon M, editors. Balloon Kyphoplasty. Vienna: Springer. p. 73-79.
7. Bouza C, Lopez T, Palma M, Amate JM. 2007. Hospitalised osteoporotic vertebral fractures in Spain: analysis of the national hospital discharge registry. Osteoporos Int. 18:649-657.
8. Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, Wark JD, Mitchell P, Wriedt C, Graves S, Staples MP, Murphy B. 2009. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med. 361(6):557-568.
9. Cao K, Grimm M, Yang K. 2001. Load sharing within a human lumbar vertebral body using the finite element method. Spine. 26(12):E253-E260.
10. Carter DR, Hayes WC. 1977. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 59(7):954-962.
11. Chevalier Y, Pahr D, Charlebois M, Heini P, Schneider E, Zysset P. 2008. Cement distribution, volume, and compliance in vertebroplasty: some answers from an anatomy-based nonlinear finite element study. Spine. 33(16):1722-1730.
12. Chung HJ, Chung KJ, Yoon HS, Kwon IH. 2008. Comparative study of balloon kyphoplasty with unilateral versus bilateral approach in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Int Orthop. 32:817-820.
13. Cotten A, Boutry N, Cortet B, Assaker R, Demondion X, Leblond D, Chastanet P, Duquesnoy B, Deramond H. 1998. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: state of the art. RadioGraphics. 18(2):311-320.
14. Dean JR, Ison KT, Gishen P. 2000. The strengthening effect of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Clin Radiol. 55:471-476.
15. Denoziere G, Ku D. 2006. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc. J Biomech. 39(4):766-775.
16. Heini PF, Orler R. 2004. Kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Eur Spine J. 13:184-192.
17. Hongo M, Abe E, Shimada Y, Murai H, Ishikawa N, Sato K. 1999. Surface strain distribution on thoracic and lumbar vertebrae under axial compression: the role in burst fractures. Spine. 24(12):1197-1202.
18. Kallmes DF, Cornstock BA, Heagerty PJ, Turner JA, Wilson DJ, Diamond TH, Edwards R, Gray LA, Stout L, Owen S, et al. 2009. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. 361(6):569-579.
19. Keller TS, Kosmopoulos V, Lieberman IH. 2005. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty affect vertebral motion segment stiffness and stress distributions-a microstructural finite-element study. Spine. 30(11):1258-1265.
20. Keyak JH, Rossi SA, Jones KA, Les CM, Skinner HB. 2001. Prediction of fracture location in the proximal femur using finite element models. Med Eng Phys. 23(9):657-664.
21. Lee K, Teo E. 2005. Material sensitivity study on lumbar motion segment (L2-L3) under sagittal plane loadings using probabilistic method. J Spinal Disord Tech. 18(2):163-170.
22. Levine SA, Perin LA, Hayes D, Hayes WS. 2000. An Evidencebased evaluation of percutaneous vertebroplasty. Manag Care. 9(3):56-60.
23. McGraw JK, Lippert JA, Minkus KD, Rami PM, Davis TM, Budzik RF. 2002. Prospective evaluation of pain relief in 100 patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty: results and follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 13(9 Part 1):883-886.
24. Mehbod A, Aunoble S, Le Huec J. 2003. Vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spine fracture: prevention and treatment. Eur Spine J. 12(Suppl 2):S155-S162. Epub 2003 Sep 19.
25. Molloy S, Mathis JM, Belkoff SM. 2003. The effect of vertebral body percentage fill on mechanical behaviour during percutaneous vertebroplasty. Spine. 28(14):1549-1554.
26. Muijs SP, Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Van Erkel AR, Dijkstra PD. 2009. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of soteoporotic vertebral compression fractures-evaluation after 36 months. J Bone Joint Surg. 91(3):379-384.
27. Pitzen T, Geisler FH, Matthis D, Müller-Storz H, Pedersen K, Steudel WI. 2001. The influence of cancellous bone density on load sharing in human lumbar spine: a comparison between an intact and a surgically altered motion segment. Eur Spine J. 10(1):23-29.
28. Polikeit A, Nolte L, Ferguson S. 2003. The effect of cement augmentation on the load transfer in an osteoporotic functional spinal unit: finite-element analysis. Spine. 28(10):991-996.
29. Rockoff S, Sweet E, Bleustein J. 1969. The relative contribution of trabecular and cortical bone to the strength of human lumbar vertebrae. Calcif Tissue Res. 3(2):163-175.
30. Rohlmann A, Zander T, Bergmann G. 2006. Spinal loads after osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated by vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Eur Spine J. 15(8):1255-1264. Epub 2005 Nov 26.
31. Ross PD, Ettinger B, Davis JW, Melton LJ 3rd, Wasnich RD. 1991. Evaluation of adverse health outcomes associated with vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int. 1:134-140.
32. Schmidt H, Heuer F, Simon U, Kettler A, Rohlmann A, Claes L, Wilke HJ. 2006. Application of a new calibration method for a three-dimensional finite element model of a human lumbar annulus fibrosus. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 21(4):337-344. Epub 2006 Jan 24.
33. Sharma M, Langrana N, Rodriguez J. 1995. Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability. Spine. 20(8):887-900.
34. Shirazi-Adl S, Shrivastava S, Ahmed A. 1984. Stress analysis of the lumbar disc-body unit in compression, a threedimensional nonlinear finite element study. Spine. 9(2):120-134.
35. Silverman SL. 1992. The clinical consequences of vertebral compression fracture. Bone. 13:S27-S31.
36. Van der Klift M, De Laet CE, McCloskey EV, Hofman A, Pols HA. 2002. The incidence of vertebral fractures in men and women: the Rotterdam Study. J Bone Miner Res. 17(6):1051-1056.
37. Villarraga ML, Bellezza AJ, Harrigan TP, Cripton PA, Kurtz SM, Edidin AA. 2005. The biomechanical effects of kyphoplasty on treated and adjacent nontreated vertebral bodies. J Spinal Disord Tech. 18(1):84-91.
38. Weinstein JN. 2009. Balancing science and informed choice in decisions about vertebroplasty. N Engl J Med. 361(6):619-621.
39. WHO. 1994. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 843:1-129.
40. Wijayathunga VN, Jones AC, Oakland RJ, Furtado NR, Hall RM, Wilcox RK. 2008. Development of specimen-specific finite element models of human vertebrae for the analysis of vertebroplasty. Proc IMechE. 222:221-228.
41. Wilcox R. 2004. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 218(1):1-10.
42. Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE. 1999. New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine. 24(8):755-762.
43. Wolff J. 1986. The law of bone remodelling. Berlin: Springer.