Addressing problems in transplantation research in the United Kingdom

Transplantation

Volumn 93, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 860-864

  Warrens, Anthony N ^a   Lovell, Helen ^b  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Ellington House   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Donor consent; Ethics; Guidance; Recipient consent; Regulation

Indexed keywords

GRAFT RECIPIENT; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; INFORMED CONSENT; LICENCE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ORGAN DONOR; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH ETHICS; REVIEW; TRANSPLANTATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 84860705661     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31824cd589     Document Type: Review

References (4)

1. Cronin AJ, Rose ML, Dark JH, et al. British transplant research endangered by the human tissue act. J Med Ethics 2011; 37: 512.
2. Irish WD, Ilsley JN, Schnitzler MA, et al. A risk prediction model for delayed graft function in the current era of deceased donor renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 2279.
3. Watson CJ, Wells AC, Roberts RJ, et al. Cold machine perfusion versus static cold storage of kidneys donated after cardiac death: A UK Multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 1991.
4. NHSBT and British Transplantation Society. Guidelines for consent for solid organ transplantation in adults. NHSBT publication, 2011. Available at: http://www.nhsbt.nhs.uk/pdf/guidelines-for-consent.pdf. Accessed June 8, 2011.