Value of performing routine postoperative liquid contrast swallow studies following robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Swiss Medical Weekly

Volumn 142, Issue APRIL, 2012, Pages

  Buchs, Nicolas C ^a   Bucher, Pascal ^a   Pugin, François ^a   Hagen, Monika E ^a   Chassot, Gilles ^a   Koutny Fong, Pascale ^a   Morel, Philippe ^a  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Contrast study; Cost; Gastric bypass; Leak; Obesity; Robotic; Stenosis

Indexed keywords

DIATRIZOATE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; MEGLUMINE DIATRIZOATE;

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTRAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTESTINE STENOSIS; JEJUNOSTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; RADIOLOGY; ROBOTICS; ROUX Y ANASTOMOSIS; STOMACH BYPASS; SWALLOWING; UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL SERIES; UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; VALIDATION PROCESS; VALIDITY; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS; CONTRAST MEDIUM EXTRAVASATION; ECONOMICS; JEJUNUM; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; RADIOGRAPHY; STOMACH;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIATRIZOATE MEGLUMINE; EXTRAVASATION OF DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC MATERIALS; FEMALE; GASTRIC BYPASS; HUMANS; JEJUNUM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; ROBOTICS; STOMACH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84860703217     PISSN: 14247860     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4414/smw.2012.13556     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Hinojosa MW, Varela JE, Parikh D, Smith BR, Nguyen XM, Nguyen NT. National trends in use and outcome of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(2):150-5.
2. Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S. Laparoscopic surgery for morbid obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 2001;81(5):1145-79. (Pubitemid 32896005)
3. Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, Ramanathan R, Luketich J. Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2000;232(4):515-29.
4. Buchwald H, Williams SE. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2003. Obes Surg. 2004;14(9):1157-64. (Pubitemid 39458587)
5. Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, Arango A, Cole CJ, Lee SJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2001;234(3):279-89; discussion 89-91.
6. Sims TL, Mullican MA, Hamilton EC, Provost DA, Jones DB. Routine upper gastrointestinal Gastrografin swallow after laparoscopic Rouxen- Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2003;13(1):66-72. (Pubitemid 36250241)
7. Hamilton EC, Sims TL, Hamilton TT, Mullican MA, Jones DB, Provost DA. Clinical predictors of leak after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(5):679-84. (Pubitemid 36532419)
8. Serafini F, Anderson W, Ghassemi P, Poklepovic J, Murr MM. The utility of contrast studies and drains in the management of patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2002;12(1):34-8. (Pubitemid 34155259)
9. Doraiswamy A, Rasmussen JJ, Pierce J, Fuller W, Ali MR. The utility of routine postoperative upper GI series following laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(12):2159-62. (Pubitemid 350125930)
10. Lyass S, Khalili TM, Cunneen S, Fujita F, Otsuka K, Chopra R, et al. Radiological studies after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: routine or selective? Am Surg. 2004;70(10):918-21.
11. Singh R, Fisher BL. Sensitivity and specificity of postoperative upper GI series following gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2003;13(1):73-5. (Pubitemid 36250242)
12. Katasani VG, Leeth RR, Tishler DS, Leath TD, Roy BP, Canon CL, et al. Water-soluble upper GI based on clinical findings is reliable to detect anastomotic leaks after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Am Surg. 2005;71(11):916-8; discussion 8-9.
13. Ayloo SM, Addeo P, Buchs NC, Shah G, Giulianotti PC. Robot-assisted versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Is There a Difference in Outcomes? World J Surg. 2011;35(3):637-42.
14. Snyder BE, Wilson T, Scaborough T, Yu S, Wilson EB. Lowering gastrointestinal leak rates: a comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass. J Robotic Surg. 2008;2:159-63.
15. Snyder BE, Wilson T, Leong BY, Klein C, Wilson EB. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass: minimizing morbidity and mortality. Obes Surg. 2010;20(3):265-70.
16. Hubbard VS, Hall WH. Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity. Obes Surg. 1991;1(3):257-65.
17. Ogden CL, Carroll MD. Prevalence of overweight, obesity, and extreme obesity among adults: United States, trends 1976-1980 through 2007-2008. National Center for Health Statistics. 2010: Available at http://www.cdc.gov/ nchs/fastats/overwt.htm. Accessed September 2010.
18. Sjostrom L, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, Karason K, Larsson B, Wedel H, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):741-52. (Pubitemid 47295641)
19. Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Elli EF, Ayloo S, Giulianotti PC. Robotic palliation for unresectable pancreatic cancer and distal cholangiocarcinoma. Int J Med Robot. 2011;7(1):60-5.
20. Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Gangemi A, Ayloo SM, Giulianotti PC. Outcomes of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients older than 70 years: a comparative study. World J Surg. 2010;34(9):2109-14.
21. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Buchs NC, et al. Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Surgery. 2010;149(1):29-39.
22. Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Ayloo S, Benedetti E, Giulianotti PC. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. World J Surg. 2011;35(12):2739-46.
23. Hubens G, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Gypen B, Van Tu T, Vaneerdeweg W. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure performed with the da Vinci robot system: is it worth it? Surg Endosc. 2008;22(7):1690-6.
24. Moser F, Horgan S. Robotically assisted bariatric surgery. Am J Surg. 2004;188(4A Suppl):38S-44S.
25. Yu SC, Clapp BL, Lee MJ, Albrecht WC, Scarborough TK, Wilson EB. Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 100 robotic-assisted gastric bypasses. Am J Surg. 2006;192(6):746-9. (Pubitemid 44854816)
26. Scozzari G, Rebecchi F, Millo P, Rocchietto S, Allieta R, Morino M. Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(2):597-603.
27. Buchs NC, Pugin F, Bucher P, Hagen ME, Chassot G, Koutny-Fong P, et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2011; Nov 2.
28. Hagen ME, Pugin F, Chassot G, Huber O, Buchs N, Iranmanesh P, et al. Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):52-61.