Association mapping of plant resistance to insects

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 311-319

  Kloth, Karen J ^a   Thoen, Manus P M ^a   Bouwmeester, Harro J ^a   Jongsma, Maarten A ^a   Dicke, Marcel ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; CHROMOSOME MAP; DISEASE RESISTANCE; GENETICS; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; INSECT; METHODOLOGY; PARASITOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT DISEASE; PLANT GENOME; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; DISEASE RESISTANCE; GENOME, PLANT; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; INSECTS; PHENOTYPE; PLANT DISEASES; PLANTS;

HEXAPODA;

EID: 84860654322     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.01.002     Document Type: Review

References (96)

1. Panda N., Khush G.S. Host Plant Resistance to Insects 1995, CABI International.
2. Schoonhoven L.M., et al. Insect-Plant Biology 2005, Oxford University Press.
3. Alonso-Blanco C., Koornneef M. Naturally occurring variation in Arabidopsis: an underexploited resource for plant genetics. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5:22-29.
4. Anderson J.T., Mitchell-Olds T. Ecological genetics and genomics of plant defences: evidence and approaches. Funct. Ecol. 2011, 25:312-324.
5. Gols R., et al. Performance of generalist and specialist herbivores and their endoparasitoids differs on cultivated and wild Brassica populations. J. Chem. Ecol. 2008, 34:132-143.
6. Mewis I., et al. Gene expression and glucosinolate accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana in response to generalist and specialist herbivores of different feeding guilds and the role of defense signaling pathways. Phytochemistry 2006, 67:2450-2462.
7. Rohr F., et al. Impact of hydroxylated and non-hydroxylated aliphatic glucosinolates in Arabidopsis thaliana crosses on plant resistance against a generalist and a specialist herbivore. Chemoecology 2011, 21:171-180.
8. Karban R., Agrawal A.A. Herbivore offense. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2002, 33:641-664.
9. Price P.W., et al. Insect Ecology: Behavior, Populations and Communities 2011, Cambridge University Press.
10. Loxdale H.D., et al. The evolutionary improbability of 'generalism' in nature, with special reference to insects. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2011, 103:1-18.
11. Vandenborre G., et al. Nicotiana tabacum agglutinin is active against Lepidopteran pest insects. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61:1003-1014.
12. Brotman Y., et al. Identification of enzymatic and regulatory genes of plant metabolism through QTL analysis in Arabidopsis. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168:1387-1394.
13. Dobón A., et al. Quantitative genetic analysis of salicylic acid perception in Arabidopsis. Planta 2011, 234:671-684.
14. Balasubramanian S., et al. QTL mapping in new Arabidopsis thaliana advanced intercross-recombinant inbred lines. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e4318.
15. Ingvarsson P.K., Street N.R. Association genetics of complex traits in plants. New Phytol. 2011, 189:909-922.
16. Atwell S., et al. Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature 2010, 465:627-631.
17. Zhu C., et al. Status and prospects of association mapping in plants. Plant Gen. 2008, 1:5-20.
18. Chan E.K.F., et al. Understanding the evolution of defense metabolites in Arabidopsis thaliana using genome-wide association mapping. Genetics 2010, 185:991-1007.
19. Chan E.K.F., et al. Combining genome-wide association mapping and transcriptional networks to identify novel genes controlling glucosinolates in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1001125.
20. Yu J.M., Buckler E.S. Genetic association mapping and genome organization of maize. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2006, 17:155-160.
21. Mitchell-Olds T. Complex-trait analysis in plants. Genome Biol. 2010, 11:1-3.
22. Price A.L., et al. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:904-909.
23. Yu J.M., et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:203-208.
24. Zhao K., et al. An Arabidopsis example of association mapping in structured samples. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3:e4.
25. Bergelson J., Roux F. Towards identifying genes underlying ecologically relevant traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:867-879.
26. Brachi B., et al. Linkage and association mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana flowering time in nature. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000940.
27. Myles S., et al. Association mapping: critical considerations shift from genotyping to experimental design. Plant Cell 2009, 21:2194-2202.
28. Visscher P.M. Sizing up human height variation. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40:489-490.
29. Mewis I., et al. Major signaling pathways modulate Arabidopsis glucosinolate accumulation and response to both phloem-feeding and chewing insects. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138:1149-1162.
30. Poelman E.H., et al. Consequences of variation in plant defense for biodiversity at higher trophic levels. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13:534-541.
31. Becerra J.X. The impact of herbivore-plant coevolution on plant community structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:7483-7488.
32. Thompson J.N. The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution 2005, University of Chicago Press.
33. Vermeer K.M.C.A., et al. The potential of a population genomics approach to analyse geographic mosaics of plant-insect coevolution. Evol. Ecol. 2011, 25:977-992.
34. Van der Meijden E. Plant defence, an evolutionary dilemma: contrasting effects of (specialist and generalist) herbivores and natural enemies. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 1996, 80:307-310.
35. Poelman E.H., et al. Herbivore-induced plant responses in Brassica oleracea prevail over effects of constitutive resistance and result in enhanced herbivore attack. Ecol. Entomol. 2010, 35:240-247.
36. Blackman R.L., Eastop V.F. Aphids on the World's Herbaceous Plants and Schrubs 2006, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Natural History Museum.
37. Steppuhn A., et al. Nicotine's defensive function in nature. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2:e217.
38. Agrawal A.A., Kurashige N.S. A role for isothiocyanates in plant resistance against the specialist herbivore Pieris rapae. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29:1403-1415.
39. Reymond P., et al. A conserved transcript pattern in response to a specialist and a generalist herbivore. Plant Cell 2004, 16:3132-3147.
40. Steppuhn A., Baldwin I.T. Resistance management in a native plant: nicotine prevents herbivores from compensating for plant protease inhibitors. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:499-511.
41. Bidart-Bouzat M., Kliebenstein D. An ecological genomic approach challenging the paradigm of differential plant responses to specialist versus generalist insect herbivores. Oecologia 2011, 167:677-689.
42. Govind G., et al. Unbiased transcriptional comparisons of generalist and specialist herbivores feeding on progressively defenseless Nicotiana attenuata plants. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e8735.
43. Sutter R., Muller C. Mining for treatment-specific and general changes in target compounds and metabolic fingerprints in response to herbivory and phytohormones in Plantago lanceolata. New Phytol. 2011, 191:1069-1082.
44. Aranzana M.J., et al. Genome-wide association mapping in Arabidopsis identifies previously known flowering time and pathogen resistance genes. PLoS Genet. 2005, 1:e60.
45. Nemri A., et al. Genome-wide survey of Arabidopsis natural variation in downy mildew resistance using combined association and linkage mapping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:10302-10307.
46. Schon C.C., et al. Quantitative trait locus mapping based on resampling in a vast maize testcross experiment and its relevance to quantitative genetics for complex traits. Genetics 2004, 167:485-498.
47. Fischer R.A. The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 1918, 52:399-433.
48. Li X., et al. Mapping QTLs for improving grain yield using the USDA rice mini-core collection. Planta 2011, 234:347-361.
49. Hammer G., et al. Models for navigating biological complexity in breeding improved crop plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11:587-593.
50. Benfey P.N., Mitchell-Olds T. Perspective - from genotype to phenotype: systems biology meets natural variation. Science 2008, 320:495-497.
51. Krips O.E., et al. Intrinsic rate of population increase of the spider mite Tetranychus urticae on the ornamental crop gerbera: intraspecific variation in host plant and herbivore. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 1998, 89:159-168.
52. Awmack C.S., Leather S.R. Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2002, 47:817-844.
53. Eberius M., Lima-Guerra J. High-throughput plant phenotyping - data acquisition, transformation, and analysis. Bioinformatics: Tools and Applications 2009, 259-278. Springer Science and Business Media. D. Edwards (Ed.).
54. Li Y., et al. Association mapping of local climate-sensitive quantitative trait loci in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:21199-21204.
55. Kang H.M., et al. Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics 2008, 178:1709-1723.
56. Hall D., et al. Using association mapping to dissect the genetic basis of complex traits in plants. Brief. Funct. Genomics 2010, 9:157-165.
57. Ballaré C.L. Illuminated behavior. Phytochrome as a key regulator of light foraging and plant herbivore defense. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32:713-725.
58. Holopainen J.K., Gershenzon J. Multiple stress factors and the emission of plant VOCs. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15:176-184.
59. Montes J.M., et al. Novel throughput phenotyping platforms in plant genetic studies. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12:433-436.
60. Fernie A.R., Schauer N. Metabolomics-assisted breeding: a viable option for crop improvement?. Trends Genet. 2009, 25:39-48.
61. Kokorian J., et al. An ImageJ based measurement setup for automated phenotyping of plants. Proceedings of the ImageJ User and Developer Conference 2010 2010, 178-182. Centre de Recherche Public Henri Tudor. A. Jahnen, C. Moll (Eds.).
62. Abe H., et al. Function of jasmonate in response and tolerance of Arabidopsis to thrip feeding. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49:68-80.
63. Buschmann C., Lichtenthaler H.K. Principles and characteristics of multi-colour fluorescence imaging of plants. J. Plant Physiol. 1998, 152:297-314.
64. Cozzolino D. Near infrared spectroscopy in natural products analysis. Planta Med. 2009, 75:746-756.
65. Rutherford R.S., van Staden J. Towards a rapid near-infrared technique for prediction of resistance to sugarcane borer Eldana saccharina Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) using stalk surface wax. J. Chem. Ecol. 1996, 22:681-694.
66. Kramer K.J., et al. Transgenic avidin maize is resistant to storage insect pests. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18:670-674.
67. Chaerle L., Van der Straeten D. Imaging techniques and the early detection of plant stress. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5:495-501.
68. Poelman E.H., et al. Performance of specialist and generalist herbivores feeding on cabbage cultivars is not explained by glucosinolate profiles. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2008, 127:218-228.
69. Hardie J., et al. The combination of electronic monitoring and video-assisted observations of plant penetration by aphids and behavioural effects of polygodial. Entomologica Experimentalis et Applicata 1992, 62:233-239.
70. Foster S.P., et al. Reduced response of insecticide-resistant aphids and attraction of parasitoids to aphid alarm pheromone; a potential fitness trade-off. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2005, 95:37-46.
71. Tjallingii W.F., Hogen Esch T. Fine structure of aphid stylet routes in plant tissues in correlation with EPG signals. Physiol. Entomol. 1993, 18:317-328.
72. Backus E.A., Bennett W.H. The AC-DC correlation monitor: new EPG design with flexible input resistors to detect both R and emf components for any piercing-sucking hemipteran. J. Insect Physiol. 2009, 55:869-884.
73. Allemand R., et al. Behavioral circadian-rhythms measured in real-time by automatic image-analysis - applications in parasitoid insects. Physiol. Entomol. 1994, 19:1-8.
74. Noldus L.P.J.J., et al. Computerised video tracking, movement analysis and behaviour recognition in insects. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2002, 35:201-227.
75. Reynolds D.R, Riley J.R. Remote-sensing, telemetric and computer-based technologies for investigating insect movement: a survey of existing and potential techniques. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2002, 35:271-307.
76. Beeuwkes J., et al. 3-D flight behaviour of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae s.s. inside an odour plume. Proc. Neth. Entomol. Soc. Meet. 2008, 19:137-146.
77. Lacey E.S., Carde R.T. Activation, orientation and landing of female Culex quinquefasciatus in response to carbon dioxide and odour from human feet: 3-D flight analysis in a wind tunnel. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2011, 25:94-103.
78. Pistori H., et al. Mice and larvae tracking using a particle filter with an auto-adjustable observation model. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2010, 31:337-346.
79. Prasifka J.R., et al. Video-tracking and on-plant tests show Cry1Ab resistance influences behavior and survival of neonate Ostrinia nubilalis following exposure to Bt maize. J. Insect Behav. 2010, 23:1-11.
80. Hagler J.R., Jackson C.G. Methods for marking insects: current techniques and future prospects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2001, 46:511-543.
81. Keurentjes J.J.B., et al. The genetics of plant metabolism. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:842-849.
82. DellaPenna D., Last R.L. Perspective - genome-enabled approaches shed new light on plant metabolism. Science 2008, 320:479-481.
83. Macel M., et al. Metabolomics: the chemistry between ecology and genetics. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 10:583-593.
84. Keurentjes J.J.B., et al. Redefining plant systems biology: from cell to ecosystem. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16:183-190.
85. Whiteman N.K., Jander G. Genome-enabled research on the ecology of plant-insect interactions. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154:475-478.
86. Ehrenreich I.M., et al. Candidate gene association mapping of Arabidopsis flowering time. Genetics 2009, 183:325-335.
87. De Vos M., et al. Signal signature and transcriptome changes of Arabidopsis during pathogen and insect attack. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2005, 18:923-937.
88. De Vos M., Jander G. Myzus persicae (green peach aphid) salivary components induce defence responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32:1548-1560.
89. Bruessow F., et al. Insect eggs suppress plant defence against chewing herbivores. Plant J. 2010, 62:876-885.
90. Van Poecke, R.M.P. (2007) Arabidopsis-insect interactions. In The Arabidopsis Book (Somerville, C.R. and Meyerowitz, E.M., eds), doi:10.1199/tab.0107, , pp. 1-34, American Society of Plant Biologists. http://www.aspb.org/publications/arabidopsis/.
91. Pieterse C.M.J., et al. Networking by small-molecule hormones in plant immunity. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5:308-316.
92. Verhage A., et al. Rewiring of the jasmonate signaling pathway in Arabidopsis during insect herbivory. Front. Plant Sci. 2011, 2:1-12.
93. Dicke M. Evolution of induced indirect defence of plants. The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses 1999, 62-88. Princeton University Press. R. Tollrian, C.D. Harvell (Eds.).
94. Heil M. Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. New Phytol. 2008, 178:41-61.
95. Dicke M., Baldwin I.T. The evolutionary context for herbivore-induced plant volatiles: beyond the 'cry for help'. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15:167-175.
96. Hilker M., Meiners T. Early herbivore alert: insect eggs induce plant defense. J. Chem. Ecol. 2006, 32:1379-1397.