Mammographic density and urbanization: A population-based screening study

Journal of Medical Screening

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 20-25

  Viel, Jean François ^a   Rymzhanova, Raouchan ^b  

^a RENNES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b Franche Comté Cancer Screening Program   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CARCINOMA; DEMOGRAPHY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FRANCE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; POPULATION DENSITY; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR; RURAL POPULATION; STATISTICS; URBAN POPULATION; URBANIZATION; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; DEMOGRAPHY; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; FRANCE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; POPULATION DENSITY; RISK FACTORS; RURAL POPULATION; URBAN POPULATION; URBANIZATION;

EID: 84860639766     PISSN: 09691413     EISSN: 14755793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jms.2011.011112     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Kelsey JL, Horn-Ross PL. Breast cancer: magnitude of the problem and descriptive epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev 1993;15:7-16 (Pubitemid 23269067)
2. Hall SA, Kaufman JS, Millikan RC, Ricketts TC, Herman D, Savitz DA. Urbanization and breast cancer incidence in North Carolina, 1995- 1999. Ann Epidemiol 2005;15:796-803 (Pubitemid 41550248)
3. Perry NM, Allgood PC, Milner SE, Mokbel K, Duffy SW. Mammographic breast density by area of residence: possible evidence of higher density in urban areas. Curr Med Res Opin 2008;24:365-8 (Pubitemid 351294386)
4. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:1159-69
5. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356:227-36 (Pubitemid 46143226)
6. Martin LJ, Minkin S, Boyd NF. Hormone therapy, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk. Maturitas 2009;64:20-6
7. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M, et al. Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:1224-37
8. Perry NM, Allgood PC, Duffy SW, Mokbel K. Exposure to traffic emissions throughout life and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control 2008;19:435
9. Santodonato J. Review of the estrogenic and antiestrogenic activity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons-relationship to carcinogenicity. Chemosphere 1997;34:835-48 (Pubitemid 27117423)
10. Petralia SA, Vena JE, Freudenheim JL, et al. Risk of premenopausal breast cancer in association with occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and benzene. Scand J Work Environ Health 1999;25:215-21 (Pubitemid 29366449)
11. Labrèche F, Goldberg MS, Valois MF, Nadon L. Postmenopausal breast cancer and occupational exposures. Occup Environ Med 2010;67:263-9
12. Bonner MR, Han D, Nie J, Rogerson P, et al. Breast cancer risk and exposure in early life to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using total suspended particulates as a proxy measure. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:53-60 (Pubitemid 40165283)
13. Nie J, Beyea J, Bonner MR, et al. Exposure to traffic emissions throughout life and risk of breast cancer: the Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer (WEB) study. Cancer Causes Control 2007;18:947-55 (Pubitemid 47237958)
14. Crouse DL, Goldberg MS, Ross NA, Chen H, Labrèche F. Postmenopausal breast cancer is associated with exposure to traffic-related air pollution in Montreal, Canada: a case-control study. Environ Health Perspect 2010;118:1578-83
15. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening. 4th ed. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2006
16. American College of Radiology: Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS TM). 4th ed. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology; 2003
17. Jong R, Fishell E, Little L, Lockwood G, Boyd NF. Mammographic signs of potential relevance to breast cancer risk: the agreement of radiologists' classification. Eur J Cancer Prev 1996;5:281-6 (Pubitemid 26342141)
18. Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1769-77 (Pubitemid 30346755)
19. Aitken Z, Walker K, Stegeman BH, et al. Mammographic density and markers of socioeconomic status: a cross-sectional study [electronic article]. BMC Cancer 2010;10:35
20. Su YS, Gelman A, Hill J, Yajima M. Multiple imputation with diagnostics (mi) in R: opening windows into the black box. J Stat Softw 2009;20:1-27
21. McCullagh P. Regression models for ordinal data (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Series B 1980;42:109-42
22. Brody JG, Rudel RA, Michels KB, et al. Environmental pollutants, diet, physical activity, body size, and breast cancer: where do we stand in research to identify opportunities for prevention? Cancer 2007;109: 2627-34 (Pubitemid 46906451)
23. Stone J, Warren RM, Pinney E, Warwick J, Cuzick J. Determinants of percentage and area measures of mammographic density. Am J Epidemiol 2009;170:1571-8
24. Eschwège E, Charles M-A, Basdevant A. National epidemiological survey on overweight and obesity in France, 2009 [in French] http://www.roche. fr/fmfiles/re7199006/cms2-cahiers-obesite/AttachedFile-10160.pdf (last accessed 8 September 2011)
25. Stuart EA, Azur M, Frangakis C, Leaf P. Multiple imputation with large data sets: a case study of the children's mental health initiative. Am J Epidemiol 2009;169:1133-9
26. Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ. Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1998;7:1133-44 (Pubitemid 29001671)
27. Kelemen LE, Pankratz VS, Sellers TA, et al. Age-specific trends in mammographic density: the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study. Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:1027-36 (Pubitemid 351601250)
28. Vachon CM, Kuni CC, Anderson K, Anderson VE, Sellers TA. Association of mammographically defined percent breast density with epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2000;11:653-62 (Pubitemid 30636365)
29. Vachon CM, Sellers TA, Vierkant RA, Wu FF, Brandt KR. Case-control study of increased mammographic breast density response to hormone replacement therapy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:1382-8 (Pubitemid 35340373)
30. Masala G, Ambrogetti D, Assedi M, Giorgi D, Del Turco MR, Palli D. Dietary and lifestyle determinants of mammographic breast density. A longitudinal study in a Mediterranean population. Int J Cancer 2006;118:1782-9 (Pubitemid 43376444)
31. Jakes RW, Duffy SW, Ng FC, et al. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and self-reported soy intake in Singapore Chinese women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:608-13 (Pubitemid 34760818)
32. Schousboe JT, Kerlikowske K, Loh A, Cummings SR. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:10-20