Movement upscaled - the importance of individual foraging movement for community response to habitat loss

Ecography

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 436-445

  Buchmann, Carsten M ^a   Schurr, Frank M ^a   Nathan, Ran ^b   Jeltsch, Florian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BODY MASS; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; HABITAT LOSS; HABITAT MANAGEMENT; HOME RANGE; MOVEMENT; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; SPACE USE;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 84860636515     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06924.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aars J. et al. 1999. Demographic consequences of movements in subdivided root vole populations. Oikos 85: 204-216.
2. Andren H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat - a review. Oikos 71: 355-366.
3. Banks S. C. et al. 2007. Sex and sociality in a disconnected world: a review of the impacts of habitat fragmentation on animal social interactions. Can. J. Zool. 85: 1065-1079.
4. Benhamou S. 1996. Space use and foraging movements in the American red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus). Behav. Process. 37: 89-102.
5. Börger L. et al. 2008. Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research. Ecol. Lett. 11: 637-650.
6. Bowers M. A. et al. 1996. Controlled experiments of habitat fragmentation: a simple computer simulation and a test using small mammals. Oecologia 108: 182-191.
7. Buchmann C. M. et al. 2011. An allometric model of home range formation explains the structuring of animal communities exploiting heterogeneous resources. Oikos 120: 106-118.
8. Cagnacci F. et al. 2010. Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365: 2157-2162.
9. Calder W. A. III 1996. Size, function, and life history. - Dover Publishers.
10. Carbone C. et al. 2005. How far do animals go? Determinants of day range in mammals. Am. Nat. 165: 290-297.
11. Crooks K. R. and Soule M. E. 1999. Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400: 563-566.
12. Debinski D. M. and Holt R. D. 2000. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv. Biol. 14: 342-355.
13. Ewers R. M. and Didham R. K. 2006. Confounding factors in the detection of species reponses to habitat fragmentation. Biol. Rev. 81: 117-142.
14. Fahrig L. 2002. Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: a synthesis. Ecol. Appl. 12: 346-353.
15. Fahrig L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34: 487-515.
16. Ficetola G. F. and Denoël M. 2009. Ecological thresholds: an assessment of methods to identify abrupt changes in species-habitat relationships. Ecography 32: 1075-1084.
17. Fielden L. J. 1991. Home range and movements of the Namib Desert golden mole, Eremitalpa granti namibensis (Chrysochloridae). J. Zool. 223: 675-686.
18. Garland T. 1983. Scaling the ecological cost of transport to body-mass in terrestrial mammals. Am. Nat. 121: 571-587.
19. Grimm V. et al. 2005. Pattern-oriented modeling of agent- based complex systems: lessons from ecology. Science 310: 987-991.
20. Grimm V. et al. 2010. The ODD protocol: a review and first update. Ecol. Model. 221: 2760-2768.
21. Harestad A. S. and Bunnell F. L. 1979. Home range and body weight - reevaluation. Ecology 60: 389-402.
22. Hargrove W. W. et al. 2002. A fractal landscape realizer for generating synthetic maps. Conserv. Ecol. 6: 2.
23. Harrison S. and Bruna E. 1999. Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation: what do we know for sure? Ecography 22: 225-232.
24. Haskell J. P. et al. 2002. Fractal geometry predicts varying body size scaling relationships for mammal and bird home ranges. Nature 418: 527-530.
25. Holling C. S. 1992. Cross-scale morphology, geometry, and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecol. Monogr. 62: 447-502.
26. Houle M. et al. 2010. Cumulative effects of forestry on habitat use by gray wolf (Canis lupus) in the boreal forest. Landscape Ecol. 25: 419-433.
27. Jetz W. et al. 2004. The scaling of animal space use. Science 306: 266-268.
28. Kelt D. A. and Van Vuren D. H. 2001. The ecology and macroecology of mammalian home range area. Am. Nat. 157: 637-645.
29. Körner K. and Jeltsch F. 2008. Detecting general plant functional type responses in fragmented landscapes using spatially-explicit simulations. Ecol. Model. 210: 287-300.
30. Leblond M. et al. 2010. What drives fine-scale movements of large herbivores? A case study using moose. Ecography 33: 1102-1112.
31. May F. et al. 2009. Reversed effects of grazing on plant diversity: the role of below-ground competition and size symmetry. Oikos 118: 1830-1843.
32. McLaughlin R. L. 1989. Search modes of birds and lizards - evidence for alternative movement patterns. Am. Nat. 133: 654-670.
33. Mitchell M. S. and Powell R. A. 2004. A mechanistic home range model for optimal use of spatially distributed resources. Ecol. Model. 177: 209-232.
34. Morales J. M. et al. 2010. Building the bridge between animal movement and population dynamics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365: 2289-2301.
35. Mueller T. and Fagan W. F. 2008. Search and navigation in dynamic environments - from individual behaviors to population distributions. Oikos 117: 654-664.
36. Mueller T. et al. 2008. In search of forage: predicting dynamic habitats of Mongolian gazelles using satellite-based estimates of vegetation productivity. J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 649-658.
37. Nagy K. A. 2001. Food requirements of wild animals: predictive equations for free-living mammals, reptiles, and birds. Nutr. Abstracts Rev. Ser. B 71: 21R-31R.
38. Nathan R. et al. 2008. A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105: 19052-19059.
39. Nonaka E. and Holme P. 2007. Agent-based model approach to optimal foraging in heterogeneous landscapes: effects of patch clumpiness. Ecography 30: 777-788.
40. Norris D. et al. 2010. Habitat patch size modulates terrestrial mammal activity patterns in Amazonian forest fragments. J. Mammal. 91: 551-560.
41. Ottaviani D. et al. 2006. Body mass as a predictive variable of home-range size among Italian mammals and birds. J. Zool. 269: 317-330.
42. Owen-Smith N. et al. 2010. Foraging theory upscaled: the behavioural ecology of herbivore movement. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365: 2267-2278.
43. Patterson T. A. et al. 2008. State-space models of individual animal movement. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23: 87-94.
44. Rhodes J. R. et al. 2005. A spatially explicit habitat selection model incorporating home range behavior. Ecology 86: 1199-1205.
45. Romero S. et al. 2009. Movement behavior in response to landscape structure: the role of functional grain. Landscape Ecol. 24: 39-51.
46. Russell R. E. et al. 2003. Population consequences of movement decisions in a patchy landscape. Oikos 103: 142-152.
47. Said S. and Servanty S. 2005. The influence of landscape structure on female roe deer home-range size. Landscape Ecol. 20: 1003-1012.
48. Saupe D. 1988. Algorithms for random fractals. - In: Petigen H. O. and Saupe D. (eds), The science of fractal images. Springer, pp. 71-113.
49. Schick R. S. et al. 2008. Understanding movement data and movement processes: current and emerging directions. Ecol. Lett. 11: 1338-1350.
50. Swihart R. K. et al. 1988. Relating body size to the rate of home range use in mammals. Ecology 69: 393-399.
51. Tristiani H. et al. 2003. Ranging and nesting behavior of the ricefield rat Rattus argentiventer (Rodentia: Muridae) in West Java, Indonesia. J. Mammal. 84: 1228-1236.
52. Van Moorter B. et al. 2009. Memory keeps you at home: a mechanistic model for home range emergence. Oikos 118: 641-652.
53. White E. P. et al. 2007. Relationships between body size and abundance in ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 323-330.
54. With K. A. and Crist T. O. 1995. Critical thresholds in species responses to landscape structure. Ecology 76: 2446-2459.
55. Whittaker R. H. 1975. Communities and ecosystems. - Macmillan.