Concurrent and face validity of a capsulorhexis simulation with respect to human patients

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 173, Issue , 2012, Pages 35-41

  Banerjee, P Pat ^a,d   Edward, Deepak P ^b,c   Liang, Shun ^a   Bouchard, Charles S ^e   Bryar, Paul J ^f   Ahuja, Richard ^g   Dray, Phillip ^g   Bailey, Daniel P ^a  

^a 1120 Science and Engineering Offices   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c KING KHALED EYE SPECIALIST HOSPITAL   (Saudi Arabia)

^d ImmersiveTouch Inc   (United States)

^e LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^f NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g Jr Hospital of Cook County   (United States)

Author keywords

Capsulorhexis; Cataract surgery; Construct validity; Face validity; ImmersiveTouch; Simulator training; Surgery simulation; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

SIMULATORS; STATISTICS; SURGERY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

CAPSULORHEXIS; CATARACT SURGERIES; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; FACE VALIDITY; IMMERSIVETOUCH; SIMULATOR TRAINING; SURGERY SIMULATIONS;

SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

ARTICLE; CAPSULORHEXIS; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

CAPSULORHEXIS; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84860635569     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-022-2-35     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. I.J. Dooley and P.D. O'Brien, Subjective difficulty of each stage of phacoemulsification cataract surgery performed by basic surgical trainees, J Cataract Refract Surg. 32 (2006), 604-608.
2. T. Sugiura, D. Kurosaka, Y. Uezuki, S. Eguchi, H. Obata, and T. Takahashi, Creating cataract in a pig eye, J Cataract Refract Surg. 25 (1999), 615-621.
3. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Ophthalmology (July 1, 2007), sec. II.D.4. http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/RRC- 240/240-prIndex.asp
4. B.A. Henderson, K.J. Grimes, R.E. Fintelmann, and T.A. Oetting, Stepwise approach to establishing an ophthalmology wet laboratory, J Cataract Refract Surg. 35 (2009) 1121-1128.
5. C.G. Laurell, P. Söderberg, L. Nordh, E. Skarman, and P. Nordqvist, Computer-simulated phacoemulsification, Ophthalmology 111 (2004), 693-698.
6. S. Liang, P.P. Banerjee, and D.P. Edward, A high performance graphic and haptic curvilinear capsulorrhexis simulation system, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009, 5092-5095.
7. S. Liang, Design and Validation of a High Performance Continuous Curvilinear Capsulorrhexis Simulator, PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2010.
8. See "concurrent validity" (also "construct validity") in Mosby's Medical Dictionary, 8th edition, Mosby/Elsevier, St. Louis, Mo., 2009.
9. B. Privett, E. Greenlee, G. Rogers, and T.A. Oetting, Construct validity of a surgical simulator as a valid model for capsulorhexis training, J Cataract Refract Surg. 36 (2010), 1835-1838.
10. E.M. Feudner, C. Engel, I.M. Neuhann, K. Petermeier, K.U. Bartz-Schmidt, and P. Szurman, Virtual reality training improves wet-lab performance of capsulorhexis: results of a randomized, controlled study, Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 247 (2009), 955-963.