Quantifying the contribution of environmental factors to isoprene flux interannual variability

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 54, Issue , 2012, Pages 216-224

  Tawfik, Ahmed B ^a   Stöckli, Reto ^b   Goldstein, Allen ^c,d   Pressley, Shelley ^e   Steiner, Allison L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b FEDERAL OFFICE OF METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY METEOSWISS   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d Berkeley   (United States)

^e Washington State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Biogenic emissions; Environmental factors; Interannual variability; Isoprene flux; Soil moisture; United States

Indexed keywords

BIOGENIC EMISSION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS; INTERANNUAL VARIABILITY; ISOPRENE FLUXES; UNITED STATES;

CLIMATE MODELS;

SOIL MOISTURE;

ISOPRENE;

BIOGENIC EMISSION; CLIMATE MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ISOPRENE; LEAF AREA INDEX; PARAMETERIZATION; PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY ACTIVE RADIATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOIL MOISTURE;

ARTICLE; CLIMATE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL TEMPERATURE; GEOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOIL MOISTURE; SUMMER;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84860607981     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: 18732844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.018     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abbot D.S., et al. Seasonal and interannual variability of North American isoprene emissions as determined by formaldehyde column measurements from space. Geophysical Research Letters 2003, 30:1999-2002.
2. Andreae M.O., Rosenfeld D. Aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions. Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols. Earth-Science Reviews 2008, 89:13-41.
3. Arneth A., et al. Why are estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions so similar (and why is this not so for monoterpenes)?. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2008, 8:4605-4620.
4. Arneth A., et al. Global terrestrial isoprene emission models: sensitivity to variability in climate and vegetation. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2011, 11:8037-8052.
5. Ashworth K., et al. Sensitivity of isoprene emissions estimated using MEGAN to the time resolution of input climate data. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2010, 10:1193-1201.
6. Chameides W.L., et al. The role of biogenic hydrocarbons in urban photochemical smog - Atlanta as a case-study. Science 1988, 241:1473-1475.
7. Decker M.R., Zeng X. Impact of modified richards equation on global soil moisture simulation in the community land Model (CLM3.5). Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 2009, 1:22.
8. Dee D.P., et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 2011, 137:553-597.
9. Dentener F., et al. Formation of secondary organic aerosol from isoprene oxidation over Europe. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2009, 9:7003-7030.
10. Duncan B.N., et al. Temperature dependence of factors controlling isoprene emissions. Geophysical Research Letters 2009, 36:L05813.
11. Fu J.S., et al. Impacts of future climate change and effects of biogenic emissions on surface ozone and particulate matter concentrations in the United States. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2011, 11:4789-4806.
12. Giorgi, F., et al. RegCM4: Model description and preliminary tests over multiple CORDEX domains. Climate Research, in press.
13. Goldstein A.H., et al. Seasonal course of isoprene emissions from a midlatitude deciduous forest. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 1998, 103:31045-31056.
14. Guenther A., et al. Isoprene emission estimates and uncertainties for the Central African EXPRESSO study domain. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 1999, 104:30625-30639.
15. Guenther A., et al. A Global-model of natural volatile oragnic-compound emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 1995, 100:8873-8892.
16. Guenther A., et al. Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2006, 6:3181-3210.
17. Gulden L.E., et al. Interannual variation in biogenic emissions on a regional scale. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 2007, 112:D14103.
18. Heald C.L., et al. Response of isoprene emission to ambient CO(2) changes and implications for global budgets. Global Change Biology 2009, 15:1127-1140.
19. Kuhn U., et al. Strong correlation between isoprene emission and gross photosynthetic capacity during leaf phenology of the tropical tree species Hymenaea courbaril with fundamental changes in volatile organic compounds emission composition during early leaf development. Plant Cell and Environment 2004, 27:1469-1485.
20. Lathiere J., et al. Past and future changes in biogenic volatile organic compound emissions simulated with a global dynamic vegetation model. Geophysical Research Letters 2005, 32.
21. Lathiere J., et al. Impact of climate variability and land use changes on global biogenic volatile organic compound emissions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2006, 6:2129-2146.
22. Lawrimore J.H., et al. Climate assessment for 2000. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 2001, 82:S1-S55.
23. Llusia J., et al. Contrasting species-specific, compound-specific, seasonal, and interannual responses of foliar isoprenoid emissions to experimental drought in a Mediterranean shrubland. International Journal of Plant Sciences 2008, 169:637-645.
24. Luo L.F., Wood E.F. Monitoring and predicting the 2007 U.S. drought. Geophysical Research Letters 2007, 34:L22702.
25. Muller J.F., et al. Global isoprene emissions estimated using MEGAN, ECMWF analyses and a detailed canopy environment model. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2008, 8:1329-1341.
26. 2. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 2004, 109:D06301.
27. Oleson K.W., et al. Improvements to the Community Land Model and their impact on the hydrological cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences 2008, 113:G01021.
28. Palmer P.I., et al. Quantifying the seasonal and interannual variability of North American isoprene emissions using satellite observations of the formaldehyde column. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 2006, 111:D12315.
29. 2 concentration and vapour pressure deficit on isoprene emission from leaves of Populus deltoides during drought. Functional Plant Biology 2004, 31:1137-1147.
30. Petron G., et al. Seasonal temperature variations influence isoprene emission. Geophysical Research Letters 2001, 28:1707-1710.
31. Pressley S., et al. Long-term isoprene flux measurements above a northern hardwood forest. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 2005, 110:D07301.
32. Rodell M., et al. The global land data assimilation system. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 2004, 85:381.
33. Sharkey T.D., et al. Field measurements of isoprene emission from trees in response to temperature and light. Tree Physiology 1996, 16:649-654.
34. Stavrakou T., et al. Global emissions of non-methane hydrocarbons deduced from SCIAMACHY formaldehyde columns through 2003-2006. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2009, 9:3663-3679.
35. Stockli R., et al. A global reanalysis of vegetation phenology. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences 2011, 116:G03020.
36. Tawfik A.B., Steiner A.L. The role of soil ice in land-atmosphere coupling over the United States: a soil moisture-precipitation winter feedback mechanism. Journal of Geophysical Research 2011, 116:D02113.
37. Warneke C., et al. Biogenic emission measurement and inventories determination of biogenic emissions in the eastern United States and Texas and comparison with biogenic emission inventories. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 2010, 115:D00F18.
38. Wilkinson M.J., et al. Leaf isoprene emission rate as a function of atmospheric CO(2) concentration. Global Change Biology 2009, 15:1189-1200.
39. Zhao T.X.P., et al. Global component aerosol direct radiative effect at the top of atmosphere. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2011, 32:633-655.