Dry self-sampling versus provider-sampling of cervicovaginal specimens for human papillomavirus detection in the Inuit population of Nunavik, Quebec

Journal of Medical Screening

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 42-48

  Cerigo, Helen ^a   Coutlée, François ^a,b   Franco, Eduardo L ^a   Brassard, Paul ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DESICCATION; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ESKIMO; ETHNOLOGY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTION; PATHOLOGY; POPULATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF EVALUATION; STATISTICS; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR; VIROLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CERVIX UTERI; COHORT STUDIES; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DESICCATION; DIAGNOSTIC SELF EVALUATION; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INUITS; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTIONS; POPULATION; QUEBEC; SPECIMEN HANDLING; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84860602162     PISSN: 09691413     EISSN: 14755793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jms.2012.012011     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999;189:12-9 (Pubitemid 29406813)
2. Cuzick J, Arbyn M, Sankaranarayanan R, et al. Overview of human papillomavirus-based and other novel options for cervical cancer screening in developed and developing countries. Vaccine 2008;26:K29-K41
3. Franco EL. Chapter 13: Primary Screening of Cervical Cancer With Human Papillomavirus Tests. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2003;2003:89-96
4. Sellors JW, Lorincz AT, Mahony JB, et al. Comparison of self-collected vaginal, vulvar and urine samples with physician-collected cervical samples for human papillomavirus testing to detect high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. CMAJ 2000;163:513-8
5. Wright Jr. TC, Denny L, Kuhn L, Pollack A, Lorincz A. HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compared with cytologic screening to detect cervical cancer. JAMA 2000;283:81-6 (Pubitemid 30038387)
6. Jones HE, Allan BR, van deWijgert JH, et al. Agreement between self- and clinician-collected specimen results for detection and typing of high-risk human papillomavirus in specimens from women in Gugulethu, South Africa. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:1679-83 (Pubitemid 46933891)
7. Sowjanya AP, Paul P, Vedantham H, et al. Suitability of self-collected vaginal samples for cervical cancer screening in periurban villages in Andhra Pradesh, India. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18:1373-8
8. Kahn JA, Slap GB, Huang B, et al. Comparison of adolescent and young adult self-collected and clinician-collected samples for human papillomavirus. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:952-9 (Pubitemid 40458997)
9. Seo SS, Song YS, Kim JW, et al. Good correlation of HPV DNA test between self-collected vaginal and clinician-collected cervical samples by the oligonucleotide microarray. Gynecol Oncol 2006;102:67-73
10. Gravitt PE, Belinson JL, Salmeron J, Shah KV. Looking ahead: a case for human papillomavirus testing of self-sampled vaginal specimens as a cervical cancer screening strategy. Int J Cancer 2011;129:517-27
11. Schmeink CE, Bekkers RL, Massuger LF, Melchers WJ. The potential role of self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus detection in cervical cancer screening. Rev Med Virol 2011;21:139-53
12. Petignat P, Faltin DL, Bruchim I, et al. Are self-collected samples comparable to physician-collected cervical specimens for human papillomavirus DNA testing? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2007;105:530-5 (Pubitemid 46590347)
13. Szarewski A, Cadman L, Mesher D, et al. HPV self-sampling as an alternative strategy in non-attenders for cervical screening - a randomized controlled trial. Br J Cancer 2011;104:915-20
14. Virtanen A, Nieminen P, Luostarinen T, Anttila A. Self-sample HPV tests as an intervention for nonattendees of cervical cancer screening in Finland: a randomized trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20:1960-9
15. Farley M, Golding JM, Minkoff JR. Is a history of trauma associated with a reduced likelihood of cervical cancer screening? J Fam Pract 2002;51:827-31
16. Deschamps M, Band PR, Hislop TG, et al. Barriers to cervical cytology screening in native women in British Columbia. Cancer Detect Prev 1992;16:337-9
17. Walsh JC. The impact of knowledge, perceived barriers and perceptions of risk on attendance for a routine cervical smear. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2006;11:291-6 (Pubitemid 46895647)
18. Barbee L, Kobetz E, Menard J, et al. Assessing the acceptability of self-sampling for HPV among Haitian immigrant women: CBPR in action. Cancer Causes Control 2010;21:421-31
19. McMullin JM, De AI, Chavez LR, Hubbell FA. Influence of beliefs about cervical cancer etiology on Pap smear use among Latina immigrants. Ethn Health 2005;10:3-18
20. Louchini R, Beaupre M. Cancer incidence and mortality among Aboriginal people living on reserves and northern villages in Quebec, 1988-2004. Int J Circumpolar Health 2008;67:445-51
21. Hamlin-Douglas LK, Coutlee F, Roger M, et al. Determinants of human papillomavirus infection among inuit women of northern Quebec, Canada. Sex Transm Dis 2010;37:377-81
22. Hamlin-Douglas LK, Coutlee F, Roger M, Franco EL, Brassard P. Prevalence and age distribution of human papillomavirus infection in a population of Inuit women in Nunavik, Quebec. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17:3141-9
23. Bennett R, Coutlee F, Roger M, Franco E, Brassard P. Incidence, persistence, and determinants of HPV infection in a population of Inuit women in Nunavik, Quebec. HPV 2010: Proceedings of the 26th International Papillomavirus Conference; July 3-8, 2010; Montreal
24. Statistics Canada. Nunavik, Quebec (table). Aboriginal Population Profile. 2006 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-594-XWE. Ottawa. Released January 15, 2008. http://www12.statcan.ca/census-recensement/2006/dp- pd/prof/92-594/index.cfm?Lang=E
25. Bouvard V, Baan R, Straif K, et al. A review of human carcinogens - Part B: biological agents. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:321-2
26. Schiffman M, Herrero R, Desalle R, et al. The carcinogenicity of human papillomavirus types reflects viral evolution. Virology 2005;337:76-84 (Pubitemid 40725441)
27. Castle PE, Rodriguez AC, Porras C, et al. A comparison of cervical and vaginal human papillomavirus. Sex Transm Dis 2007;34:849-55 (Pubitemid 350301046)
28. Fleiss JL. The Measurement of Interrater Agreement. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1981. p. 211-37
29. Petignat P, Hankins C, Walmsley S, et al. Self-sampling is associated with increased detection of human papillomavirus DNA in the genital tract of HIV-seropositive women. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:527-34 (Pubitemid 41099649)
30. Winer RL, Feng Q, Hughes JP, et al. Concordance of self-collected and clinician-collected swab samples for detecting human papillomavirus DNA in women 18 to 32 years of age. Sex Transm Dis 2007;34:371-7 (Pubitemid 46816783)
31. Safaeian M, Kiddugavu M, Gravitt PE, et al. Comparability of self-collected vaginal swabs and physician-collected cervical swabs for detection of human papillomavirus infections in Rakai, Uganda. Sex Transm Dis 2007;34:429-36 (Pubitemid 46987946)
32. Harper DM, Noll WW, Belloni DR, Cole BF. Randomized clinical trial of PCR-determined human papillomavirus detection methods: self-sampling versus clinician-directed-biologic concordance and women's preferences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:365-73 (Pubitemid 34234143)
33. Harper DM, Longacre MR, Noll WW, Belloni DR, Cole BF. Factors affecting the detection rate of human papillomavirus. Ann Fam Med 2003;1:221-7
34. Winer RL, Lee SK, Hughes JP, et al. Genital human papillomavirus infection: incidence and risk factors in a cohort of female university students. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:218-26 (Pubitemid 36152435)
35. Gravitt PE, Lacey Jr. JV, Brinton LA, et al. Evaluation of self-collected cervicovaginal cell samples for human papillomavirus testing by polymerase chain reaction. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:95-100 (Pubitemid 32172426)
36. Karwalajtys T, Howard M, Sellors JW, Kaczorowski J. Vaginal self sampling versus physician cervical sampling for HPV among younger and older women. Sex Transm Infect 2006;82:337-9 (Pubitemid 44229454)
37. Stenvall H, Wikstrom I, Backlund I, Wilander E. Accuracy of HPV testing of vaginal smear obtained with a novel self-sampling device. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:16-21 (Pubitemid 46009520)
38. Feng Q, Cherne S, Winer RL, et al. Evaluation of transported dry and wet cervical exfoliated samples for detection of human papillomavirus infection. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:3068-72
39. Cerigo H, Macdonald ME, Franco EL, Brassard P. HPV detection by self-sampling in Nunavik, Quebec: Inuit women's sampling method preferences. Journal of Aboriginal Health 2011
40. Moscicki AB. Comparison between methods for human papillomavirus DNA testing: a model for self-testing in young women. J Infect Dis 1993;167:723-5