Shear resistance of pinned connections of precast members to monotonic and cyclic loading

Engineering Structures

Volumn 41, Issue , 1970, Pages 413-427

  Psycharis, Ioannis N ^a   Mouzakis, Harris P ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Connections; Cyclic response; Design of dowels; Monotonic response; Pinned connections; Precast; Prefabrication; Seismic design; Shear design; Shear resistance

Indexed keywords

CYCLIC LOADS; DUCTILITY; FASTENERS; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMOLOGY; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR STRENGTH; WAVEGUIDE COUPLERS;

CYCLIC RESPONSE; MONOTONIC RESPONSE; PRE-CAST; PREFABRICATION; SHEAR DESIGN; SHEAR RESISTANCES;

CONCRETES;

EID: 84860599626     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: 18737323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.051     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Park R, et al. Seismic design of precast concrete structures – state of the art report. fib Bulletin 27; 2003.
2. Elliott, K.S., Research and development in precast concrete framed structures. Prog Struct Eng Mater 2:4 (2000), 405–428.
3. Simeonov S, et al. Building construction under seismic conditions in the Balkan region – design and construction of prefabricated reinforced concrete building systems. UNDP/UNIDO, project RER/79/015; 1985.
4. American Technology Council (ATC). Proceedings of a workshop on design of prefabricated concrete buildings for earthquake loads. Report No. ATC-08; 1981.
5. International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib). Structural connections for precast concrete buildings. Bulletin 43; 2008.
6. Priestley, M.J.N., The PRESSS program – current status and proposed plans for phase III. PCI J 41:2 (1996), 22–40.
7. Nakaki, S.W., Standon, J., Sritharan, S., An overview of the PRESSS five story precast test building. PCI J 44:2 (1999), 26–39.
8. Stanton JF. The PRESSS program in the USA and Japan – seismic testing of precast concrete structures. Proceedings of the COST C1 international conference on control of the semi-rigid behaviour of civil engineering structural connections, Liege; 1998. p. 13–24.
9. Shiohara H, Watanabe F. The Japan PRESS precast concrete connection design. Proceedings f the 12th WCEE, Aukland; 2000.
10. COST C1. Control of the semi-rigid behaviour of civil engineering structural connections. Final Report European Commission EUR 19244; 1999.
11. Virdi K, Ragupathy R. Tests on precast concrete subframes with semi-rigid joints. Proceedings of the 1st COST C1 state of the art workshop on semi-rigid behaviour of civil engineering structural connections, Strasbourg; 1992. p. 120–31.
12. Virdi K, Ragupathy R. Analysis of precast concrete frames with semi-rigid joints. Proceedings of the 1st COST C1 state of the art workshop on semi-rigid behaviour of civil engineering structural connections, Strasbourg; 1992. p. 296–307.
13. Elliott KS. Semi-rigid connections in precast concrete structures and bridges. Proceedings of the COST C1 international conference on control of the semi-rigid behaviour of civil engineering structural connections, Liege; 1998. p. 3–12.
14. De Chefbedien A. Precast beam-to-column head connections. Proceedings of the COST C1 international conference on control of the semi-rigid behaviour of civil engineering structural connections, Liege; 1998. p. 35–44.
15. Elliott KS, Davies G, Mahdi AA, Gorgun H, Virdi K, Ragupathy P. Precast concrete semi-rigid beam-to-column connections in skeletal frames. Proceedings of the COST C1 international conference on control of the semi-rigid behaviour of civil engineering structural connections, Liege; 1998. p. 45–54.
16. Jolly CK, Guo M. Application of numerical analysis to connection in precast concrete frames. Proceedings of the COST C1 international conference on control of the semi-rigid behaviour of civil engineering structural connections, Liege; 1998. p. 65–74.
17. Imai H, Castro JJ, Yanez R, Yamaguchi T. A new precast system for frame structures and its structural characteristics. In: Dhir, RK, Jones MR, editors. Concrete 2000. London: E & N Spon.; 1993. p. 655–70.
18. Watanabe F. Seismic design for prefabricated and prestressed concrete moment resisting frames. Proceedings of the PCI/FHWA/FIB international symposium on high performance concrete, Florida, USA; 2000. p. 820–9.
19. Priestley, M.J.N., Tao, J., Seismic response of precast prestressed concrete frames with partially debonded tendons. PCI 38:1 (1993), 58–69.
20. Nakaki, S.D., Englekirk, R.E., Plaehn, J.L., Ductile connectors for a precast concrete frame. PCI 39:5 (1994), 46–59.
21. Ersoy, U., Tankut, T., Precast concrete members with welded plate connections under reversed cyclic loading. PCI 38:4 (1993), 94–100.
22. El Debs MK, El Debs ALH, Miotto AM. Experimental analysis of Beam-to-Column connection with semi-rigid behaviour of precast concrete structures. Proceedings of the 2nd fib congress, Naples, Italy; 2006.
23. Rahman, A.B. Abd, Ghazali, A.R., Hamid, Z. Abd, Comparative study of monolithic and precast concrete beam-to-column connections. Malaysian Constr Res J 2:1 (2008), 42–55.
24. Leong DCP. Testing of pinned beam-to-column connections of precast concrete frames. Master thesis, University Technology, Kuala Lampur, Malaysia; 2006.
25. Vintzeleou EN, Tassios TP. Mechanics of load transfer along interfaces in reinforced concrete, prediction of shear force vs. shear displacement curves. Studie de Reserche, No. 7, Corpo di Perfezionamento per le Construzioni in Cemento Amato, Italcementi Societa per Azioni (S. p:A), Bergamo, Italy; 1985. p. 121–61.
26. Vintzeleou, E.N., Tassios, T.P., Behavior of dowels under cyclic deformations. ACI 84:1 (1987), 18–30.
27. Tsoukantas, S.G., Tassios, T.P., Shear resistance of connections between reinforced concrete linear precast elements. ACI 86:3 (1989), 242–249.
28. Negro P, Mola E, Ferrara L, Zhao B, Magonette G, Molina J. PRECAST EC8: seismic behaviour of precast concrete structures with respect to Eurocode 8. Final report of the experimental activity of the Italo-Slovenian Group, Parts 1, 2, 3, FP6 Project No. G6RD-CT-2002-00857; 2007.
29. Carydis PG, Psycharis IN, Mouzakis HP. PRECAST EC8: seismic behaviour of precast concrete structures with respect to Eurocode 8. Final report of the contribution of LEE/NTUA, FP5 Project No. G6RD-CT-2002-00857; 2007.
30. Psycharis IN, Mouzakis HP, Carydis PG. Experimental investigation of the seismic behaviour of prefabricated RC structures. Proceedings of the 2nd fib congress, Naples, Italy; 2006.
31. Kramar M, Fischinger M, Isaković T. Seismic vulnerability of the EC8 designed columns in industrial buildings. Proceedings of the 2nd fib congress, Naples, Italy; 2006.
32. SAFECAST. Experimental behaviour of existing connections. Deliverables 2.1., FP7 Project No. 218417; 2012.
33. SAFECAST. Quantification of the effects of dynamic loads. Deliverables 2.2., FP7 Project No. 218417; 2012.
34. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures – Part 1–1: general rules and rules for buildings. EN 1992–1-1, Brussels; 2004.
35. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998–1, Brussels; 2004.