Flux characteristics at oscillating membrane equipped with turbulent promoters

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 191, Issue , 2012, Pages 541-547

  Gomaa, H G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Flux enhancement; Membrane separation; Microfiltration; Oscillatory motion; Process intensification; Turbulence promotion

Indexed keywords

COMBINED EFFECT; EDDY VISCOSITY; EQUATION OF MOTION; EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENTS; FLUX CHARACTERISTICS; FLUX ENHANCEMENT; MEMBRANE SEPARATION; MODEL PREDICTION; OSCILLATORY MOTION; PROCESS INTENSIFICATION; QUASI-STEADY STATE; TIME AVERAGES; TIME INVARIANTS; TURBULENCE PROMOTERS; TURBULENT PROMOTER;

EQUATIONS OF MOTION;

MICROFILTRATION;

EID: 84860587485     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.03.026     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Gomaa H., Al-Taweel A.M. Intensification of inter-phase mass transfer: the combined effect of oscillatory motion and turbulence promoters. Heat Mass Transfer 2007, 43(4):371-379.
2. Herman C., Kang E. Comparative evaluation of three heat transfer enhancement strategies in a grooved channel. Heat Mass Transfer 2001, 37:563-575.
3. Herman C., Kang E. Experimental visualization and temperature field and study of heat transfer enhancement in oscillatory flow in a grooved channel. Heat Mass Transfer 2001, 37:87-99.
4. Ni X., Mackley M.R., Harvey A.P., Stonestreet P., Baird M.H.I., Rama Rao N.V. Mixing through oscillations and pulsations - a guide to achieve process enhancements in the chemical and process industries. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 2003, 81:373-383.
5. Mackley M.R., Stonestreet P. Heat transfer and associated energy dissipation for oscillatory flow in baffled tubes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1995, 50(14):2211-2224.
6. Genkin G., Waite T.D., Fane A.G., Chang S. The effect of vibration and coagulant addition on the filtration performance of submerged hollow fibre membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:726-734.
7. Bellhouse B.J., Sobey I.J., Alani S., DeBlois B.M. Enhanced filtration using flat membranes and standing vortex waves. Bioseparation 1994, 4:127-138.
8. Gomaa H., Al-Taweel A.M. Effect of oscillatory motion on heat transfer at vertical flat surfaces. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 2005, 48:1494-1504.
9. Gomaa H., Al-Taweel A.M. Dynamical analysis of mass transfer at vertically oscillating surfaces. Chem. Eng. J. 2004, 102:71-82.
10. Gomaa H., Al Taweel A.M., Landau J. Mass transfer enhancement at vibrating electrodes. Chem. Eng. J. 2004, 97:141-149.
11. Beier S.P., Jonsson G. Separation of enzymes and yeast cells with a vibrating hollow fiber membrane module. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 53:111-118.
12. Beier S.P., Guerra M., Garde A., Jonsson G. Dynamic microfiltration with a vibrating hollow fiber membrane module: filtration of yeast suspensions. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:281-287.
13. Jaffrin M.Y. Dynamic shear enhanced membrane filtration: a review of rotating disks, rotating membranes, and vibrating system. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 324:7-25.
14. Akoum O.A., Jaffrin M.Y., Ding L., Paullier P., Vanhoutte C. A hydrodynamic investigation of microfiltration and ultrafiltration in a vibrating membrane module. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 197:37-52.
15. Gomaa H.G., Rao S., Al Taweel A.M. Intensification of membrane microfiltration using oscillatory motion. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 78:336-344.
16. Gomaa H.G., Rao S., Al Taweel A.M. Flux enhancement using oscillatory motion and turbulent promoters. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 381:64-73.
17. Sobey I.J. On the flow through furrowed channels. Part 1. Calculated flow patterns. J. Fluid Mech. 1980, 96:1-26.
18. Wang Y., Howell J.A., Field R.W., Wu D. Simulation of cross-flow filtration for baffled tubular channels and pulsatile flow. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 95:243-258.
19. Nashimura T., Kojima N. Mass transfer enhancement in symmetric sinusoidal wavy walled channel for pulsatile flow. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 1995, 38:1719-1731.
20. Schlichiting H. Boundary-Layer Theory 1979, McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, pp. 615-626. 7th ed.
21. J. Nikuradse, Strmungsgesetze in Rauhen Rohren, Forschg. Arbein Ing.-Wesen, July/August, 1933, p. 361.
22. Sigal A., Danberg J.E. New correlation of roughness density effect on the turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J. 1990, 28(3):554-556.
23. C.K. Liu, S.J. Kline, J.P. Johnston, An Experimental Study on Turbulent Boundary Layer on Rough Walls, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford Univ., Rept. MD-15, 1966.
24. Gomaa H.G., Rao S. Analysis of flux enhancement at oscillating flat surface membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 374:59-66.
25. Geissler S., Werner U. Dynamic model of crossflow microfiltration in flat-channel systems under laminar flow conditions. Filtr. Sep. 1995, 32(6):523-537.
26. Trettin D.R., Doshi M.R. Limiting flux in ultrafiltration of macromolecular solutions. Chem. Eng. Commun. 1980, 4:507-522.
27. Jaffrin M.Y., Ding H., Akoum O., Brou A. A hydrodynamic comparison between rotating disk and vibratory dynamic filtration systems. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 242:155-167.
28. Akoum O.A., Jaffrin M.Y., Ding L.H. Concentration of total milk proteins by high shear ultrafiltration in a vibrating membrane module. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 247:211-220.
29. Keskinler B., Yildiz E., Erhan E., Dogru M., Bayhan Y.K., Akay G. Cross flow microfiltration of low concentration non-living yeast suspensions. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 233:59-69.