Neo(Liberal) citizens of Europe: Politics, scales, and visibilities of environmental citizenship in contemporary Turkey

Citizenship Studies

Volumn 15, Issue 6-7, 2011, Pages 837-859

  Harris, Leila M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Citizenship; Environmental citizenship; Neoliberal; Scale; Subjectivity

Indexed keywords

CITIZENSHIP; ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS; NEOLIBERALISM; POLITICAL RELATIONS;

EUROPE; TURKEY;

EID: 84860576056     PISSN: 13621025     EISSN: 14693593     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2011.600095     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Adaman, F., 1997. The political economy of environment in Turkey. New perspectives on Turkey, 17, 129-150.
2. Adaman, F. and Arsel, M., 2005. Environmentalism in Turkey: between democracy and development? Aldershot: Ashgate.
3. Adem, C., 2005. Non-state actors and environmentalism. In: F. Adaman and M. Arsel, eds. Environmentalism in Turkey: between democracy and development? Aldershot: Ashgate, 67-84.
4. Agrawal, A., 2005. Environmentality: technologies of government and the making of subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5. Bacchi, C. and Eveline, J., 2003. Mainstreaming and neoliberalism: a contested relationship. Policy and society: journal of public, foreign and global policy, 22(2), 98-118.
6. Barbour, R.S. and Kitzinger, J., 1999. Developing focus group research. London: SAGE Publications.
7. Bell, D., 2005. Liberal environmental citizenship. Environmental politics, 14 (2), 179-194.
8. Bickerstaff, K., Simmons, P. and Pidgeon, N., 2008. Constructing responsibilities for risk: negotiating citizen-state relationships. Environment and planning, A40, 1312-1330.
9. Bikmen, F. and Meydanoglu, Z., eds. 2006. Civil society in Turkey: an era of transition (CIVICUS Civil Society Index Country Report for Turkey). Istanbul: TUSEV, 174. Available from: http://www.step.org.tr [Accessed 3 December 2009].
10. Bondi, L. and Laurie, N., eds, 2005. Working the spaces of neoliberalism: activism, professionalisation and incorporation. Oxford: Blackwell.
11. Delaney, D. and Leitner, H., 1997. The political construction of scale. Political geography, 16 (2), 93-97.
12. Diez, T., Agnantopoulos, A. and Kaliber, A., 2005. Turkey Europeanization, and civil society: introduction. South European society and politics, 10 (1), 1-15.
13. Dobson, A., 2003. Citizenship and the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Dobson, A. and Bell, D., 2006. Environmental citizenship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Dreyfus, H. and Rabinow, P., 1983. Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16. Dunlap, R.E., Gallup, G. and Gallup, A., 1993. Health of the planet: results of a 1992 international environmental public opinion survey of citizens in 24 nations. Princeton, NJ: George Gallup Institute.
17. Duru, B., 2006. Modern Muhafazakarli{dotless}k ve Liberal Politikalar Arasi{dotless}nda Doǧal Varli{dotless}klar: AKP'nin Çevre Politikalari{dotless}na Bir Baki{dotless}ş(Natural assets in between modern conservatism and liberal policies: a view on AKP's environmental policies). Mülkiye, 252, 297-313.
18. Gabrielson, T., 2008. Green citizenship: a review and critique. Citizenship studies., 12 (4), 429-446.
19. Gardner, S.S., 1995. Major themes in the study of grassroots environmentalism in developing countries. Journal of third world studies, XII (2), 200-245.
20. Göksel, D.N. and Guneş, R.B., 2005. The role of NGOs in the European integration process: the Turkish experience. South European society and politics, 10 (1), 57-72.
21. Gökşen, F., Adaman, F. and Zenginobuz, E., 2002. On environmental concern, willingness of pay, and postmaterialist values: evidence from Istanbul. Environment and behavior, 34, 460-477.
22. Goldman, M., 2001. Constructing an environmental state: eco-governmentality and other transnational practices of a 'green' World Bank. Social problems, 48 (4), 499-523.
23. Goss, J.D., 1996. Introduction to focus groups. Area, 28 (2), 113-114.
24. Guthman, J., 2008. Review of Robbins Lawn People: how grasses, weeds, and chemicals make us who we are. Professional geographer, 60 (3), 425-426.
25. Haggerty, J.H., 2007. 'I'm not a greenie but.': environmentality, eco-populism and governance in New Zealand: experiences from the Southland Whitebait fishery. Journal of rural studies, 23, 222-237.
26. Harris, L., (in process). Imaginative geographies of green: unmapping difference, post coloniality and affect in environmental narratives of contemporary Turkey. Manuscript in process.
27. Harris, L., 2005. Negotiating inequalities: democracy, gender, and the politics of difference in water user groups of Southeastern Turkey. In: M. Arsel and F. Adaman, eds. Turkish environmentalism: between democracy and development. Aldershot: Ashgate, 185-200.
28. Haynes, J., 2009. Power, politics, and environmental movements in the third world. Environmental politics, 8 (1), 222-242.
29. Heynen, N., McCarthy, J., Prudham, S. and Robbins, P., eds, 2007. Neoliberal environments: false promises and unnatural consequences. New York: Routledge.
30. Ignatow, G., 2005. Economic dependency and environmental attitudes in Turkey. Environmental politics, 14 (5), 648-666.
31. Ignatow, G., 2006. Cultural models of nature and society: reconsidering environmental attitudes and concern. Environment and behavior, 38 (4), 441-461.
32. Izci, R., 2005. The impact of the European Union on environmental policy. In: F. Adaman and M. Arsel, eds. Environmentalism in Turkey: between democracy and development? Aldershot: Ashgate, 87-100.
33. Jasanoff, S. and Martello, M.L., eds, 2004. Earthly politics: local and global environmental governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Kadioǧlu, A., 1998. Citizenship and individuation in Turkey: the triumph of will over reason. Cahiers d'etudes sur la Mediterranee, 26, 23-43.
35. Kaiser, R. and Nikiforova, E., 2008. The performativity of scale: the social construction of scale effects in Narva, Estonia. Environment and planning D: society and space, 26 (3), 537-562.
36. Katz, C., 2005. Partners in crime? Neoliberalism and the production of new political subjectivities. Antipode, 37 (3), 623-631.
37. Keyman, E.F. and Önis, Z., 2007. Globalization and social democracy in the European periphery: paradoxes of the Turkish experience. Globalizations, 4 (2), 211-228.
38. Kubicek, P., 2005. The European Union and grassroots democracy in Turkey. Turkish studies, 6 (3), 361-377.
39. Larner, W., 2000. Neo-liberalism: policy, ideology, governmentality. Studies in political economy, 63, 5-25.
40. Larner, W., 2003. Neoliberalism? Environment and planning D: society and space, (21), 509-512.
41. Linnros, H., 2001. The discursive nature of environmental conflicts: the case of the Oresund link. Area, 33 (4), 391-403.
42. Maniates, M., 2001. Individualization: plant a tree, buy a bike, save the world? Global environmental politics? 1 (3), 31-52.
43. McCarthy, J., 2005a. Scale, sovereignty, and strategy in environmental governance. Antipode, 37 (4), 731-753.
44. McCarthy, J., 2005b. Devolution in the woods: community forestry as hybrid neoliberalism. Environment and planning, A37 (6), 995-1014.
45. McNeill, D., 2005. Narrating neoliberalism. Geographical research, 43 (1), 113-115.
46. Mitchell, K., 2004. Crossing the neoliberal line: pacific rim migration and the metropolis. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
47. Müftüler-Baç, M., 2005. Turkey's political reforms and the impact of the European Union. South European society and politics, 10 (1), 17-31.
48. Neumann, R., 2009. Political ecology: theorizing scale. Progress in human geography, 33 (3), 398-406.
49. Ong, A., 2006. Neoliberalism as exception: mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
50. Paulson, S. and Gezon, L., 2005. Political ecology across spaces, scales and social groups. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
51. Peck, J. and Tickell, A., 2002. Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34 (3), 380-404.
52. Phillips, L. and Ilcan, S., 2004. Capacity-building: the neoliberal governance of development. Canadian journal of development studies, 25 (3), 393-409.
53. Power, M., 2005. Working the spaces of neoliberalism. Antipode, 37 (3), 606-612.
54. Rankin, K.N., 2001. Governing development: neoliberalism, microcredit, and rational economic woman. Economy and society, 30 (1), 18-37.
55. Robbins, P., 2006. Review: environmentality: technologies of government and the making of subjects. Geographical review, 96 (4), 715R.
56. Robbins, P., 2007. Lawn People: how grasses, weeds, and chemicals make us who we are. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
57. Rutherford, S., 2007. Green governmentality: insights and opportunities in the study of nature's rule. Progress in human geography, 31, 291-307.
58. Secor, A., 2004. 'There is an Istanbul that belongs to me': citizenship, space, and identity in the city. Annals of the association of American geographers, 94 (2), 352-368.
59. STGM website, 2008. Civil Society Development Center (Sivil Toplum Gelisterme Merkezi), Available from: http://www.stgm.org.tr [Accessed 18 August 2008].
60. Szerszynski, B., 2005. Local landscapes and global belonging: toward a situated citizenship of the environment. In: A. Dobson and D. Bell, eds. Environmental citizenship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Taylor, P. and Buttel, F., 1992. How do we know we have global environmental problems? Science and the globalization of environmental discourse. Geoforum, 23 (3), 405-416.
62. Towers, G., 2000. Applying the political geography of scale: grassroots strategies and environmental justice. The professional geographer, 52 (1), 23-36.
63. Tuncer, G., Ertepinar, H., Tekkaya, C. and Sungur, S., 2005. Environmental attitudes of young people in Turkey: effects of school type and gender. Environmental education research., 11 (2), 215-233.
64. Wainwright, J., 2008. The nature of interpellation: review of P. Robbins Lawn People. Association of American Geographers annual meeting, Boston, MA.
65. Yeh, E.T., 2005. Green governmentality and pastoralism in western China: 'Converting pastures to grasslands'. Nomadic peoples, 9 (1-2), 9-30.
66. Yeh, E.T., 2007. Tropes of indolence and the cultural politics of development in Lhasa, Tibet. Annals of association of American geographers, 97 (3), 593-612.
67. Zavetoski, S., McCormick, S. and Brown, P., 2004. Gender, embodiment, and disease: environmental breast cancer activists' challenges to science, the biomedical model, and policy. Science as culture, 13 (4), 563-586.