Is it ethical to suggest that some women need incentives to use contraception or to be sterilized?

Addiction

Volumn 107, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1047-1049

  Paltrow, Lynn M ^a  

^a National Advocates for Pregnant Women   (United States)

Author keywords

Addiction; Coercion; Contraception; Drug use; Pregnant women; Project Prevention; Reproductive health; Sterilization; Substance abuse

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; CONTRACEPTION; ETHICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; NOTE; REWARD;

CONTRACEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; REWARD; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 84860564071     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03816.x     Document Type: Note

References (20)

1. Lucke J. C., Hall W. D. Under what conditions is it ethical to offer incentives to encourage drug-using women to use long-acting forms of contraception? Addiction 2012; 107: 1036-41.
2. Paltrow L. Why caring communities must oppose C.R.A.C.K. /Project Prevention: How C.R.A.C.K. promotes dangerous propaganda and undermines the health and wellbeing of children and families. Wayne State University Law School. The Journal of Law in Society 2003; 5-118.
3. Dateline NBC. The crusader; one woman's crusade to help babies born to drug addicted mothers [NBC television broadcast, aired 9 September 1998.
4. Committee on Women, Population and the Environment Population and Development, CLPP Hampshire College. CRACK uses unethical tactics to stop women with substance abuse problems from becoming pregnant in political environments; 1998; 8 [citing Mothers Paid to Stop Having Children. Marie Claire: December 1998].
5. 60 Minutes II. CRACK BABIES/sterilization [CBS television broadcast, 13 March 2001.
6. BBC HARDtalk. Sterilisation for drug addicts? 10 August 2010.
7. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994, p. 181-3.
8. Betancourt L., Fischer R., Giannetta J., Malmud E., Bodsky N. L., Hurt H. Problem-solving ability of inner-city children with and without in utero cocaine exposure, 20. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1999; December; 418.
9. Mozes A. Poverty has greater impact than cocaine on young brain. Reuters Health 6 December 1999.
10. Rosenbaum M., Murphy S. Women and addiction: process, treatment, and outcome. Lambert E. Y., editor. The Collection and Interpretation of Data from Hidden Populations. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1990, p. 120-7.
11. National Advocates for Pregnant Women, Project Prevention: Mothers and children speak out. March 2012. (Archived at ).
12. Paltrow L. Prosecution and prejudice: judging drug using pregnant women. Hanigsberg J., Ruddick S., editors. Mother Troubles. Richmond, VA: Beacon Press; 1999, p. 59-80.
13. Roberts D. Shattered Bonds: The Color of Child Welfare (2002).
14. Cherry A. The detention, confinement, and incarceration of pregnant women for the benefit of fetal health, 16. Columbia J Gender Law 2007; 147.
15. Frank D. A., Augustyn M., Knight M. G., Pell T., Zuckerman B. Growth, development, and behavior in early childhood following prenatal cocaine exposure: a systematic review. JAMA 2001; 285: 1613-25.
16. Chavkin W. Cocaine and pregnancy: time to look at the evidence. JAMA 2001; 285: 1626-8.
17. Ferguson etal. v. City of Charleston etal. 532 U.S. 67. 2001.
18. Roberts D. Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. London: Vintage; 1999.
19. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Communication on Health Care for Underserved Women. Committee Opinion 473 Substance Abuse Reporting and Pregnancy: the role of the obstetrician-gynecologist. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 200-1.
20. Chervenak F. A., McCullough L. B. Legal intervention during pregnancy. JAMA 1990; 264: 2663-70.