A simplified method for coupled analysis of floating offshore wind turbines

Marine Structures

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 45-63

  Karimirad, Madjid ^a   Moan, Torgeir ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Dynamic response analysis; Floating wind turbines; Stochastic wave and wind loads

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMIC FORCES; COMPREHENSIVE METHOD; COMPUTATIONAL TIME; COUPLED ANALYSIS; DEEP WATER; DYNAMIC LINK LIBRARY; DYNAMIC MOTIONS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS; EXTERNAL INPUT; OFFSHORE WIND TURBINES; PRE-ENGINEERING; ROTOR DYNAMIC; SIMPLIFIED METHOD; STATISTICAL CHARACTERISTICS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; WIND LOAD;

AERODYNAMIC LOADS; AERODYNAMICS; LOADS (FORCES); WIND STRESS; WIND TURBINES;

FACTOR ANALYSIS;

AERODYNAMICS; DEEP WATER; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; FLOATING OFFSHORE STRUCTURE; LOADING; STOCHASTICITY; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; WATER DEPTH; WIND TURBINE;

EID: 84860552345     PISSN: 09518339     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2012.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Karimirad M, Gao Z, Moan T. Dynamic Motion Analysis of Catenary Moored Spar Wind Turbine In Extreme Environmental Condition, Offshore Wind Conference 2009, Sweden, 2009.
2. Karimirad M., Moan T. Wave and wind induced dynamic response of catenary moored spar wind turbine. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering 2012, 138(1):9-20.
3. Karimirad M., Moan T. Extreme dynamic structural response analysis of catenary moored spar wind turbine in harsh environmental conditions. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (JOMAE), ASME 2011, 133(Issue 4). 10.1115/1.4003393.
4. Larsen T.J., Hansen A.M. HAWC2 user manual 2008, Risø National Laboratory, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.
5. MARINTEK Simo theory manual 2009, Sintef, Trondheim, Norway.
6. MARINTEK Riflex theory manual 2008, Sintef, Trondheim, Norway.
7. Nielsen F.G., Hanson T.D., Skaare B. Integrated dynamic analysis of floating offshore wind turbines 2006, 2006. EWEC, Athens, Greece, 2006.
8. Nielsen F.G., Hanson T.D., Skaara B. Integrated dynamic analysis of floating offshore wind turbine 2006, OMAE 2006-92291, Germany.
9. Gao Z, Luan CY, Moan T, Skaare B, Solberg T, Lygren JE. Comparative study of wind- and wave-induced dynamic responses of three floating wind turbines supported by spar, semi-submersible and tension-leg floaters. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Offshore Wind Energy and Ocean Energy, October 31-November 2 2011, Beijing, China.
10. Karimirad M. Stochastic dynamic response analysis of spar-type wind turbines with catenary or Taut mooring systems. Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Doctoral theses at NTNU, 2011:8, Trondheim, Norway, 2011.
11. Hansen M.O.L. Aerodynamics of wind turbines 2008, Earthscan, UK. 2nd ed.
12. Hansen M.O.L., Sorensen J.N., Voutsinas S., Sorensen N., Madsen H.Aa State of the art in wind turbine aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Progress in Aerospace Sciences Journal 2006, 42:285-330.
13. Jonkman J., Butterfield S., Musial W., Scott G. Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development 2009, NREL/TP-500-38060, NREL, USA.
14. Larsen TJ, Hanson TD. A method to avoid negative damped low frequent tower vibrations for a floating, pitch controlled wind turbine. Journal of Physics, The Science of Making Torque from Wind, IOP Publishing, Conference Series 75 (2007) 012073, . doi:10.1088/1742-6596/75/1/012073,%202007.
15. Karimirad M, Moan T. Ameliorating the Negative Damping in the Dynamic Responses of a Downwind Tension Leg Spar Type Offshore Wind Turbine, European Wind Energy Conference (EWEC2011), Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
16. Karimirad M, Moan T. Stochastic dynamic response analysis of a tension leg spar-type offshore wind turbine. Journal of Wind Energy (Wiley), under review, submitted for publication.
17. Karimirad M., Meissonnier Q., Gao Z., Moan T. Hydroelastic code-to-code comparison for a tension leg spar-type floating wind turbine. Journal of Marine Structures 2011, 24:412-435. 10.1016/j.marstruc.2011.05.006.
18. Johannessen K., Meling T.S., Haver S. Joint distribution for wind and waves in the Northern North Sea 2001, ISOPE, Stavanger, Norway.
19. DNV Design of offshore wind turbine structures 2004, DNV-OS-J101, Norway.
20. Haslum HA, Faltinsen OM. Alternative shape of Spar Platform for Use in Hostile Areas, Paper No. 10953, Offshore Technology conference (OTC), Houston, Texas, USA, 1999.
21. Koo B.J., Kim M.H., Randall R.E. Mathieu instability of a spar platform with mooring and risers. Ocean Engineering Journal 2004, 31(Issues 17-18):2175-2208.
22. Jonkman J, Larsen T, Hansen A, Nygaard T, Maus K, Karimirad M, et al. Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration within IEA Wind Task 23: Phase IV Results Regarding Floating Wind Turbine Modeling. Proceedings of the European Wind Energy Conference (EWEC), National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Warsaw, Poland, April 2010.