Normalization of visual evoked potentials using underlying electroencephalogram levels improves amplitude reproducibility in rats

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1473-1478

  You, Yuyi ^a   Thie, Johnson ^a   Klistorner, Alexander ^a,b   Gupta, Vivek K ^a   Graham, Stuart L ^a,b  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION; ANIMAL; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; VISUAL DISORDER;

ANIMALS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; MALE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VISION DISORDERS;

EID: 84860545548     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8797     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Creutzfeldt O, Maekawa K, Hosli L. Forms of spontaneous and evoked postsynaptic potentials of cortical nerve cells. Prog Brain Res. 1969;31:265-273.
2. Fahle M, Bach M. Origin of the visual evoked potentials. In: Heckenlively J, Arden G, eds. Principles and Practice of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2006:207-234.
3. Arieli A, Shoham D, Hildesheim R, Grinvald A. Coherent spatiotemporal pattern of on-going activity revealed by real-time optical imaging coupled with single unit recording in the cat visual cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1995;73:2072-2093.
4. Arieli A, Sterkin A, Grinvald A, Aertsen A. Dynamics of ongoing activity: explanation of the large variability in evoked cortical potentials. Science. 1996;273:1868-1871.
5. Fellinger R, Klimesch W, Gruber W, Freunberger R, Doppelmayr M. Pre-stimulus alpha phase-alignment predicts p1-amplitude. Brain Res Bull. 2011;85:417-423.
6. Jansen B, Zouridakis G, Brandt M. A neurophysiologically based mathematical model of flash visual evoked potentials. Biol Cybern.1993;68:275-283.
7. Klistorner A, Arvind H, Nguyen T, et al. Axonal loss and myelin in early ON loss in postacute optic neuritis. Ann Neurol. 2008;64: 325-331.
8. Klistorner A, Arvind H, Garrick R, Graham S, Paine M, Yiannikas C. Inter-relationship of optic coherence tomography and multifocal visual-evoked potentials after optic neuritis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:2770-2777.
9. You Y, Klistorner A, Thie J, Graham S. Latency delay of visual evoked potential is a real measurement of demyelination in a rat model of optic neuritis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:6911-6918.
10. Iwamura Y, Fujii Y, Kamei C. The effects of certain H1-antagonists on visual evoked potential in rats. Brain Res Bull. 2003;61:393-398.
11. Meyer R, Weissert R, Diem R, et al. Acute neuronal apoptosis in a rat model of multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci. 2001;21:6214-6220.
12. Ridder W. Visual evoked potentials in animals. In: Heckenlively JR, Arden GB, eds. Principles and Practice of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2006:935-947.
13. You Y, Klistorner A, Thie J, Graham S. Improving reproducibility of VEP recording in rats: electrodes, stimulus source and peak analysis. Doc Ophthalmol. 2011;123:109-119.
14. Baseler H, Sutter E, Klein S, Carney T. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;90:65-81.
15. Heiduschka P, Schraermeyer U. Comparison of visual function in pigmented and albino rats by electroretinography and visual evoked potentials. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246: 1559-1573.
16. Creel D, Dustman RE, Beck EC. Intensity of flash illumination and the visually evoked potential of rats, guinea pigs and cats. Vision Res. 1974;14:725-729.
17. Basar E, Rahn E, Demiralp T, Schurmann M. Spontaneous EEG theta activity controls frontal visual evoked potential amplitudes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;108:101-109.
18. Brandt M, Jansen B. The relationship between prestimulus-alpha amplitude and visual evoked potential amplitude. Int J Neurosci.1991;61:261-268.
19. Meeren H, Van Luijtelaar E, Coenen A. Cortical and thalamic visual evoked potentials during sleep-wake states and spike-wave discharges in the rat. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998; 108:306-319.
20. Klistorner A, Graham S. Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials: effect on intersubject amplitude variability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:2145-2152.
21. Bland J, Altman D. Measurement error. BMJ. 1996;313:744-753.
22. Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1: 307-310.
23. McGraw K, Wong S. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods. 1996;1:30-46.
24. Miyake K-I, Yoshida M, Inoue Y, Hata Y. Neuroprotective effect of transcorneal electrical stimulation on the acute phase of optic nerve injury. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:2356-2361.
25. Jehle T, Wingert K, Dimitriu C, et al. Quantification of ischemic damage in the rat retina: a comparative study using evoked potentials, electroretinography, and histology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:1056-1064.
26. Guire E, Lickey M, Gordon B. Critical period for the monocular deprivation effect in rats: assessment with sweep visually evoked potentials. J Neurophysiol. 1999;81:121-128.
27. Henry K, Rhoades R. Relation of albinism and drugs to the visual evoked potential of the mouse. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1978;92: 271-279.
28. Castro-Junior J, Resende L, Bertotti M, Fonseca R, Zanchetta S, Schelp A. Comparison of the effects of barbiturate, benzodiazepine and ketamine on visual evoked potentials in rabbits. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;45:259-262.
29. Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, et al. ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials (2009 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 2010;120:111-119.
30. Allison T, Hume A, Wood C, Goff W. Developmental and aging changes in somatosensory, auditory and visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1984;58:14-24.
31. Celesia G, Kaufman D, Cone S. Effects of age and sex on pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalog Clin Neurophysiol. 1987;68:161-171.