Guiding a constraint dependency parser with supertags

COLING/ACL 2006 - 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 289-296

  Foth, Kilian ^a   By, Tomas ^a   Menzel, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION PROCESS; DEPENDENCY PARSER; STRUCTURAL INTERPRETATION; UPPER BOUND; VARYING MODELS; WEIGHTED CONSTRAINTS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84860523289     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1220175.1220212     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. S. Bangalore and A. K. Joshi. 1999. Supertagging: an approach to almost parsing. Computational Linguistics, 25(2):237-265.
2. T. Brants, R. Hendriks, S. Kramp, B. Krenn, C. Preis, W. Skut, and H. Uszkoreit. 1997. Das NEGRAAnnotationsschema. Technical report, Universität des Saarlandes, Computerlinguistik.
3. S. Brants, St. Dipper, S. Hansen, W. Lezius, and G. Smith. 2002. The TIGER treebank. In Proc. Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories, Sozopol.
4. T. Brants. 2000. TnT - A statistical part-of-speech tagger. In Proc. the 6th Conf. on Applied Natural Language Processing, ANLP-2000, pages 224-231, Seattle, WA.
5. J. Chen, S. Bangalore, M. Collins, and O. Rambow. 2002. Reranking an N-gram supertagger. In Proc. 6th Int.Workshop on Tree AdjoiningGrammar and Related Frameworks.
6. S. Clark and J. R. Curran. 2004a. The importance of supertagging for wide-coverage CCG parsing. In Proc. 20th Int. Conf. on Computational Linguistics.
7. S. Clark and J. R. Curran. 2004b. Parsing the WSJ using CCG and log-linear models. In Proc. 42ndMeeting of the ACL.
8. M. Daum, K. Foth, and W. Menzel. 2003. Constraint based integration of deep and shallow parsing techniques. In Proc. 11th Conf. of the EACL, Budapest, Hungary.
9. M. Daum, K. Foth, and W. Menzel. 2004. Automatic transformation of phrase treebanks to dependency trees. In Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC-2004, pages 99-106, Lisbon, Portugal.
10. K. Foth and J. Hagenström. 2002. Tagging for robust parsers. In 2nd Workshop on Robust Methods in Analysis of Natural Language Data, ROMAND-2002, pages 21 - 32, Frascati, Italy.
11. K. Foth and W. Menzel. 2006. Hybrid parsing: Using probabilistic models as predictors for a symbolic parser. In Proc. 21st Int. Conf. on Computational Linguistics, Coling-ACL-2006, Sydney.
12. K. Foth, M. Daum, and W. Menzel. 2004. A broadcoverage parser for german based on defeasible constraints. In 7. Konferenz zur Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache, KONVENS-2004, pages 45-52,Wien.
13. R. McDonald, F. Pereira, K. Ribarov, and J. Hajic. 2005. Non-projective dependency parsing using spanning tree algorithms. In Proc. Human Language Technology Conference, HLT/EMNLP-2005, Vancouver, B.C.
14. A. Nasr and O. Rambow. 2004. A simple stringrewriting formalism for dependency grammar. In Coling-Workshop Recent Advances in Dependency Grammar, pages 17-24, Geneva, Switzerland.
15. A. Sarkar, F. Xia, and A. Joshi. 2000. Some experiments on indicators of parsing complexity for lexicalized grammars. In Proc. COLING Workshop on Efficiency in Large-Scale Parsing Systems.
16. Y. Schabes and A. K. Joshi. 1991. Parsing with lexicalized tree adjoining grammar. In M. Tomita, editor, Current Issues in Parsing Technologies. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. I. Schröder,W. Menzel, K. Foth, and M. Schulz. 2000. Modeling dependency grammar with restricted constraints. Traitement Automatique des Langues (T.A.L.), 41(1):97-126.
18. W. Wang and M. P. Harper. 2002. The SuperARV language model: Investigating the effectiveness of tightly integrating multiple knowledge sources. In Proc. Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP-2002, pages 238-247, Philadelphia, PA.
19. W. Wang and M. P. Harper. 2004. A statistical constraint dependency grammar (CDG) parser. In Proc. ACL Workshop Incremental Parsing: Bringing Engineering and Cognition Together, pages 42-49, Barcelona, Spain.
20. Ch. M. White. 2000. Rapid Grammar Development and Parsing: Constraint Dependency Grammar with Abstract Role Values. Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.