Cervical cancer screening and adherence to follow-up among Hispanic women study protocol: A randomized controlled trial to increase the uptake of cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women

BMC Cancer

Volumn 12, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Duggan, Catherine ^a   Coronado, Gloria ^b   Martinez, Javiera ^a,c,d   Byrd, Theresa L ^e   Carosso, Elizabeth ^a   Lopez, Cathy ^f   Benavides, Maria ^g   Thompson, Beti ^a  

^a Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^d PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^e Paul L Foster School of Medicine   (United States)

^f Breast Cervical and Colon Health Program of Yakima Valley   (United States)

^g Yakima Valley Farmworker's Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer disparities; Cervical cancer screening; Hispanic women; Pap test

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COMMUNITY CARE; COMMUNITY HOSPITAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURAL SENSITIVITY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH EDUCATION; HISPANIC; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; NORMAL HUMAN; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PARALLEL DESIGN; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; VIDEORECORDING;

ADULT; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; RESEARCH DESIGN; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; WASHINGTON; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84860522965     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712407     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-170     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Working Group The Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Screening Programmes. Screening for squamous cervical cancer: duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. Br Med J 1986, 293(6548):659-664. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Working Group.
2. Sasieni PD, Cuzick J, Lynch-Farmery E. Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer. The National Co-ordinating Network for Cervical Screening Working Group. Br J Cancer 1996, 73(8):1001-1005. 10.1038/bjc.1996.196, 2075813, 8611418.
3. US Department of Health and Human Services US Preventive Services Task Force: Screening for Cervical Cancer. Recommendations and Rationale. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2003, AHRQ Publication, Washington DC, No. 03-515A, US Department of Health and Human Services.
4. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations) 2012, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner MP, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09/, based on November 2011 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site.
5. American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figures 2009 2009, i-64. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, American Cancer Society.
6. Engelstad LP, Stewart SL, Nguyen BH, Bedeian KL, Rubin MM, Pasick RJ, Hiatt RA. Abnormal Pap smear follow-up in a high-risk population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001, 10(10):1015-1020.
7. Jones HW. Clinical treatment of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance cervical cytology. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000, 43(2):381-393. 10.1097/00003081-200006000-00017, 10863635.
8. Bazargan M, Bazargan SH, Farooq M, Baker RS. Correlates of cervical cancer screening among underserved Hispanic and African-American women. Prev Med 2004, 39(3):465-473. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.05.003, 15313085.
9. Johnson CE, Mues KE, Mayne SL, Kiblawi AN. Cervical cancer screening among immigrants and ethnic minorities: a systematic review using the Health Belief Model. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2008, 12(3):232-241. 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31815d8d88, 18596467.
10. Harmon MP, Castro FG, Coe K. Acculturation and cervical cancer: knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors of Hispanic women. Women Health 1996, 24(3):37-57.
11. Scarinci IC, Garcia FA, Kobetz E, Partridge EE, Brandt HM, Bell MC, Dignan M, Ma GX, Daye JL, Castle PE. Cervical cancer prevention: new tools and old barriers. Cancer 2010, 116(11):2531-2542. 2876205, 20310056.
12. U.S. Census Bureau U.S. Census Bureau, Detailed Tables: Yakima County, Washington 2002, U.S. Census Bureau, American Fact Finder, Yakima County, WA, http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml, U.S. Census Bureau.
13. Coronado GD, Farias A, Thompson B, Godina R, Oderkirk W. Attitudes and beliefs about colorectal cancer among Mexican Americans in communities along the US-Mexico border. Ethn Dis 2006, 16(2):421-427.
14. Byrd TL, Wilson KM, Smith JL, Heckert AL, Orians C, Vernon SW, Fernandez-Esquer M, Fernandez ME. Using Intervention Mapping as a Participatory Strategy: Development of a Cervical Cancer Intervention for Hispanic Women. Health Educ Behav 2012, Epub ahead of print.
15. Hansen LK, Feigl P, Modiano MR, Lopez JA, Escobedo Sluder S, Moinpour CM, Pauler DK, Meyskens FL. An educational program to increase cervical and breast cancer screening in Hispanic women: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Cancer Nurs 2005, 28(1):47-53. 10.1097/00002820-200501000-00007, 15681982.
16. Hunter JB, de Zapien JG, Papenfuss M, Fernandez ML, Meister J, Giuliano AR. The impact of a promotora on increasing routine chronic disease prevention among women aged 40 and older at the U.S.-Mexico border. Health Educ Behav 2004, 31(4 Suppl):18S-28S. 10.1177/1090198104266004, 15296689.
17. Larkey L. Las mujeres saludables: reaching Latinas for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer prevention and screening. J Community Health 2006, 31(1):69-77. 10.1007/s10900-005-8190-2, 16482767.
18. Larkey LK, Gonzalez JA, Mar LE, Glantz N. Latina recruitment for cancer prevention education via Community Based Participatory Research strategies. Contemp Clin Trials 2009, 30(1):47-54. 10.1016/j.cct.2008.08.003, 18775798.
19. Changing health behaviour intervention and research with social cognition models 2002, Open University Press, Bukingham, UK.
20. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychol Rev 1977, 84(2):191-215.
21. Freeman HP. A model patient navigator program. Oncol Issues 2004, 19:44-47.
22. Dohan D, Schrag D. Using navigators to improve care of underserved patients. Cancer 2005, 104:848-855. 10.1002/cncr.21214, 16010658.