Optimization of preparation conditions for activated carbons from date stones using response surface methodology

Powder Technology

Volumn 224, Issue , 2012, Pages 101-108

  Theydan, Samar K ^a   Ahmed, Muthanna J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAGHDAD   (Iraq)

^b UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Activated carbon; Chemical activation; Date stones; Ferric chloride; Phenol

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION TEMPERATURES; ACTIVATION TIME; CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGNS; DATE STONES; EQUILIBRIUM DATA; FERRIC CHLORIDE; IMPREGNATION RATIOS; LANGMUIR ISOTHERM; OPTIMAL CONDITIONS; OPTIMUM CONDITIONS; PREPARATION CONDITIONS; PROCESS VARIABLES; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SECOND-ORDER POLYNOMIAL; SURFACE AREA; ZINC CHLORIDE ACTIVATION;

ACTIVATED CARBON; ADSORPTION; CHLORINATION; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; IMPREGNATION; OPTIMIZATION; PHENOLS;

CHEMICAL ACTIVATION;

ACTIVATED CARBON; FERRIC CHLORIDE; PHOSPHORIC ACID; ZINC CHLORIDE;

ACTIVATION TEMPERATURE; ACTIVATION TIME; ADSORPTION; AGRICULTURAL WASTE; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATE STONE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; IMPREGNATION RATIO; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PARAMETERS; PHENOL UPTAKE; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PRODUCT YIELD; RECYCLING; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 84860499258     PISSN: 00325910     EISSN: 1873328X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.02.037     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Dabrowski A., Podkoscielny P., Hubicik Z., Barczak M. Adsorption of phenolics compounds by activated carbon-a critical review. Chemosphere 2005, 58:1049-1070.
2. Canizares P., Carmona M., Baraga O., Rodrigo M.A. Adsorption equilibrium of phenol onto chemical modified activated carbon F400. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2006, 131:243-248.
3. Juttner K., Galla U., Schmieder H. Electrochemical approaches to environmental problems in the process industry. Electrochimica Acta 2000, 45:2575-2954.
4. Tomaszewska M., Mozia S., Morawski W. Removal of organic matter by coagulation enhanced with adsorption on PAC. Desalination 2004, 162:79-87.
5. Lazarova Z., Boyadzhieva S. Treatment of phenol-containing aqueous solutions by membrane-based solvent extraction in coupled ultra filtration modules. Chemical Engineering Journal 2004, 100:129-138.
6. Kujawski W., Warszawski A., Ratajczak W., Capala W. Removal of phenol from waste water by different separation techniques. Desalination 2004, 163:287-296.
7. Xu J. Synergy effect on a supported mixture of ceria and activated carbon for the photo catalytic degradation of phenol. Powder Technology 2011, 210:1-5.
8. Halouli K.A., Drawish N.M. Effect of pH and inorganic salts on the adsorption of phenol from aqueous systems on activated decolorizing charcoal. Separation Science and Technology 1995, 30:3313-3324.
9. Khezami L., Chetouani A., Taouk B., Capart R. Production and characterization of activated carbon from wood components in powder: cellulose, lignin, xylan. Powder Technology 2005, 157:48-56.
10. 3. Bioresource Technology 2007, 98:145-149.
11. Hameed B.H., Salman S.M., Ahmad A.L. Adsorption isotherm and kinetic modeling of 2,4-d-pesticide on activated carbon derived from date stones. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009, 163:121-126.
12. Alhamed Y.A. Phenol removal using granular activated carbon from date stones. Bulgarian Chemical Communications 2008, 41:26-35.
13. Avelar F.F., Bianchi M.L., Cncalves M., da Mota E.G. The use of piassava fibers (Attalea funifera) in the preparation of activated carbon. Bioresource Technology 2010, 101:4639-4645.
14. Kantarli I.C., Yanik J. Activated carbon from leather shaving wastes and its application in removal of toxic materials. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2010, 179:348-356.
15. Altenor S., Carene B., Emmanuel E., Lambert J., Ehrhardt J.J., Gaspard S. Adsorption studies of methylene blue and phenol onto vetiver roots activated carbon prepared by chemical activation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009, 165:1029-1039.
16. Alhamed Y.A. Adsorption kinetics and performance of packed bed adsorber for phenol removal using activated carbon from dates stones. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009, 170:763-770.
17. 2 as activating agents. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009, 165:87-94.
18. Kilic M., Apaydin-Varol E., Putun A.E. Adsorptive removal of phenol from aqueous solutions on activated carbon prepared from tobacco residues: equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2011, 189:397-403.
19. 2 on microstructure, surface chemistry, and double-layer capacitance of carbons from waste biomass. Journal of Materials Research 2010, 25:1451-1459.
20. Karacan F., Ozedan U., Karacan S. Optimization of manufacturing conditions for activated carbon from Turkish lignite by chemical activation using response surface methodology. Applied Thermal Engineering 2007, 27:1212-1218.
21. Ahmad A.A., Hameed B.H., Ahmad A.L. Removal of disperse dye from aqueous solution using waste-derived activated carbon: optimization study. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009, 170:612-619.
22. Tan I.A.W., Ahmad A.L., Hameed B.H. Optimization of preparation conditions for activated carbons from coconut husk using response surface methodology. Chemical Engineering Journal 2008, 137:462-470.
23. Vargas A.M.M., Garcia C.A., Reis E.M., Lenzi E., Costa W.F., Almeida V.C. NaOh-activated carbon from flamboyant (Delonix regia) pods: optimization of preparation conditions using central composite rotatable design. Chemical Engineering Journal 2010, 162:43-50.
24. Hameed B.H., Tan I.A.W., Ahmad A.L. Optimization of basic dye removal by oil palm fiber-based activated carbon using response surface methodology. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2008, 158:324-332.
25. Ahmad M.A., Alrozi R. Optimization of preparation conditions for mangosteen peel-based activated carbons for removal of brilliant blue R using response surface methodology. Chemical Engineering Journal 2010, 165:883-890.
26. Tan I.A.W., Ahmad A.L., Hameed B.H. Preparation of activated carbon from coconut husk: optimization study on removal of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol using response surface methodology. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2008, 153:709-717.
27. Ahmedna M., Marshall W.E., Rao R.M., Clarke S.J. Use of filtration and buffers in raw sugar color measurement. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1997, 75:109-116.
28. Brunauer S., Emmett P.H., Teller E. Adsorption of gases in multi molecular layers. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1938, 60:309-319.
29. ASTM standard Standard test method for total ash content of activated carbon. Designation 2000, D2866-94.
30. Adekola F.A., Adegoke H.I. Adsorption of blue-dye on activated carbons produced from rice husk, coconut shell and coconut coirpith. Ife Journal of Science 2005, 7:151-157.
31. Liu Q.S., Zheng T., Wang P., Jiang J.P., Li N. Adsorption isotherm, kinetics and mechanism of some substituted phenols on activated carbon fibers. Chemical Engineering Journal 2010, 157:348-356.
32. Mohd Din A.T., Hameed B.H., Ahmad A.L. Batch adsorption of phenol onto physicochemical activated coconut shell. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009, 161:1522-1529.
33. Haimour N.M., Emeish S. Utilization of date stones for production of activated carbon using phosphoric acid. Waste Management 2006, 26:651-660.
34. 4 as chemical activator for adsorption of phenolic compounds. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100:6586-6591.
35. Girgis B.S., El-Hendawy A. Porosity development in activated carbon obtained from date pits under chemical activation with phosphoric acid. Microporous & Mesoporous Materials 2002, 52:105-117.
36. Mohanty K., Das D., Biswas M.N. Preparation and characterization of activated carbons from Sterculia alata nutshell by chemical activation with zinc chloride to remove phenol from wastewater. Adsorption 2006, 12:119-132.
37. Lua A.C., Lau F.Y., Guo J. Influence of pyrolysis conditions on pore development of oil palm shell activated carbon. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 2006, 27:96-102.
38. Sudaryanto Y., Hartono S.B., Irawaty W., Ismadji S. High surface area activated carbon prepared from cassava peel by chemical activation. Bioresource Technology 2006, 97:734-739.
39. +2 ion. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2001, 85:301-315.