The utility of a graphical representation of discourse structure in spoken dialogue systems

ACL 2007 - Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 360-367

  Rotaru, Mihai ^a   Litman, Diane J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISCOURSE STRUCTURE; GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONS; NAVIGATION MAP; OBJECTIVE METRICS; PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS; SPOKEN DIALOGUE SYSTEM; USER STUDY;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SPEECH PROCESSING;

GRAPHIC METHODS;

EID: 84860498836     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. K. Acomb, J. Bloom, K. Dayanidhi, P. Hunter, P. Krogh, E. Levin and R. Pieraccini. 2007. Technical Support Dialog Systems: Issues, Problems, and Solutions. In Proc. of Workshop on Bridging the Gap: Academic and Industrial Research in Dialog Technologies.
2. J. Allen, G. Ferguson, B. N., D. Byron, N. Chambers, M. Dzikovska, L. Galescu and M. Swift. 2006. Chester: Towards a Personal Medication Advisor. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 39(5).
3. J. Allen, G. Ferguson and A. Stent. 2001. An architecture for more realistic conversational systems. In Proc. of Intelligent User Interfaces.
4. J. Cassell, Y. I. Nakano, T. W. Bickmore, C. L. Sidner and C. Rich. 2001. Non-Verbal Cues for Discourse Structure. In Proc. of ACL.
5. A. Graesser, K. Moreno, J. Marineau, A. Adcock, A. Olney and N. Person. 2003. AutoTutor improves deep learning of computer literacy: Is it the dialog or the talking head? In Proc. of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED).
6. B. Grosz and C. L. Sidner. 1986. Attentions, intentions and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3).
7. D. Higgins, J. Burstein, D. Marcu and C. Gentile. 2004. Evaluating Multiple Aspects of Coherence in Student Essays. In Proc. of HLT-NAACL.
8. J. Hirschberg and C. Nakatani. 1996. A prosodic analysis of discourse segments in direction-giving monologues. In Proc. of ACL.
9. E. Hovy. 1993. Automated discourse generation using discourse structure relations. Articial Intelligence, 63(Special Issue on NLP).
10. D. Litman and S. Silliman. 2004. ITSPOKE: An intelligent tutoring spoken dialogue system. In Proc. of HLT/NAACL.
11. S. Oviatt, R. Coulston and R. Lunsford. 2004. When Do We Interact Multimodally? Cognitive Load and Multimodal Communication Patterns. In Proc. of International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces.
12. R. Passonneau and D. Litman. 1993. Intention-based segmentation: Human reliability and correlation with linguistic cues. In Proc. of ACL.
13. H. Pon-Barry, K. Schultz, E. O. Bratt, B. Clark and S. Peters. 2006. Responding to Student Uncertainty in Spoken Tutorial Dialogue Systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16.
14. C. Rich and C. L. Sidner. 1998. COLLAGEN: A Collaboration Manager for Software Interface Agents. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 8(3-4).
15. M. Rotaru and D. Litman. 2006. Exploiting Discourse Structure for Spoken Dialogue Performance Analysis. In Proc. of EMNLP.
16. M. Walker, D. Litman, C. Kamm and A. Abella. 2000. Towards Developing General Models of Usability with PARADISE. Natural Language Engineering.