Microfluidic assay to compare secretion vs contact based cell-cell interactions using dynamic isolation control

14th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences 2010, MicroTAS 2010

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 277-279

  Ingram, Patrick ^a   Kim, Young Ji ^a,b   Bersano Begey, Tom ^a   Lou, Xia ^a   Asakura, Atsushi ^c   Yoon, Euisik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b SAMSUNG Electronics   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell interaction; Microwells; Pneumatic control; Secretion vs. contact

Indexed keywords

CAPTURE EFFICIENCY; CELL INTERACTION; CELL-CELL INTERACTION; DYNAMIC ISOLATION; FABRICATED DEVICE; MICROFLUIDIC ASSAYS; MICROFLUIDIC CHIP; MICROWELLS;

ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; PHYSIOLOGY; PNEUMATIC CONTROL;

CYTOLOGY;

EID: 84860476850     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. J. Burbaum, Miniaturization technologies in HTS: how fast, how small, how soon, Drug Discov Today, 3, 313 (1998)
2. Z. Yin, C. J. Wang, R. Hang and A. Levchenko, Analysis of pairwise cell interactions using an integrated dielectrophoretic-microfluidic system, Mol Syst Biol, 4, 232 (2008)
3. Carlo, D. D., & Lee, L.P., Dynamic single-cell analysis for quantitative biology, Anal. Chem. 78, 7918-7925 (2006)
4. Parekkadana, B. et al. Neurosci. Lett. 438, 190-195 (2008).
5. Y.-J. Kim, T. Bersano-Begey, X. Lou, J. Chung, and E. Yoon, International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences (mTAS'09), pp. 1772-1774 (2009)
6. C. Christov et al. Mol Biol Cell. 2007 Apr; 18(4):1397-409. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
7. A. Asakura, H. Hirai, B. Kablar, S. Morita, J. Ishibashi, B. A. Piras, A. J. Christ, M. Verma, K. A. Vineretsky, M. A. Rudnicki Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 104 (42), 16552-16557