A bundle adjustment approach with inner constraints for the scaled orthographic projection

ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 919-926

  Blonquist, Keith F ^a   Pack, Robert T ^b  

^a Lidar Pacific Corporation   (United States)

^b Utah State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Analytical photogrammetry; Bundle adjustment; Inner constraints; Narrow field of view; Orthogonal projection; Quaternions

Indexed keywords

BUNDLE ADJUSTMENTS; INNER CONSTRAINTS; NARROW FIELD-OF-VIEW; ORTHOGONAL PROJECTION; QUATERNIONS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PIXELS;

IMAGE MATCHING;

DATA SET; ERROR ANALYSIS; FIELD OF VIEW; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PIXEL; REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 84860398215     PISSN: 09242716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cooper M., Cross P. Statistical concepts and their application in photogrammetry and surveying. Photogrammetric Record 1988, 12(71):637-663.
2. Cooper M., Cross P. Statistical concepts and their application in photogrammetry and surveying (continued). Photogrammetric Record 1991, 13(77):645-678.
3. Dermanis A. The photogrammetric inner constraints. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 1994, 49(Part 1):25-39.
4. Foerstner, W., 1999. On estimating rotations. Festschrift für Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinrich Ebner zum 60. Geburtstag, 12 p.
5. Fraser C.S., Yamakawa T. Insights into the affine model for high resolution satellite sensor orientation. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2003, 58(5-6):275-288.
6. Granshaw S.I. Bundle adjustment methods in engineering photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Record 1980, 10(56):181-207.
7. Hamilton W.R. On quaternions or on new system of imaginaries in algebra. Philosophical Magazine 1844, 25:92.
8. Hartley R.I., Zisserman A. Multiple view geometry in computer vision 2004, Cambridge University Press. second ed.
9. Horn, B.K.P., 1990. Recovering baseline and orientation from 'essential' matrix. (accessed 26.8.2010). http://people.csail.mit.edu/bkph/articles/Essential.pdf.
10. Huang T.S., Lee C.H. Motion and structure from orthographic projections. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1989, 11(5):536-540.
11. Kyle S. Using parallel projection mathematics to orient an object relative to a single image. Photogrammetric Record 2004, 19(105):38-50.
12. Luhmann T., Robson S., Kyle S., Harley I. Close Range Photogrammetry. Principles, Methods and Applications 2006, Whittles Publishing, Dunbeath, Scotland.
13. Mikhail E.M., Bethel J.M., McGlone J.C. Introduction to Modern Photogrammetry 2001, John Wiley and Sons.
14. Ono T., Hattori S. Fundamental principles of image orientation using orthogonal projection model. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 2002, 34(Part 3B):194-199.
15. Tomasi C., Kanade T. Shape and motion from image streams under orthography: a factorization method. International Journal of Computer Vision 1992, 9(2):137-154.
16. Triggs, B., McLauchlan, P.F., Hartley, R.I., Fitzgibbon, A.W., 2000. Bundle adjustment - a modern synthesis. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Vision Algorithms: Theory and Practice (ICCV '99). Springer-Verlag, London, UK, pp. 298-372.
17. Wolf P.R., Dewitt B.A. Elements of Photogrammetry with Applications in GIS 2000, McGraw Hill. third ed.
18. Xirouhakis Y., Delopoulos A. Least squares estimation of 3D shape and motion of rigid objects from their orthographic projections. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2000, 22(4):393-399.