Nanocrystalline cellulose: Morphological, physical, and mechanical properties

Forest Products Journal

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 104-112

  Landry, Véronic ^a   Alemdar, Ayse ^a   Blanchet, Pierre ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; HIGH RESOLUTION TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MOISTURE; MOISTURE DETERMINATION; NANOCRYSTALS; PARTICLE SIZE; PULP MATERIALS; REFRACTIVE INDEX; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ABBE REFRACTOMETERS; DIFFERENT SOLVENTS; FOURIER-TRANSFORM RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY; HARDNESS AND ELASTIC MODULUS; NANOCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; NANOCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE(NCC); NANOINDENTATION TECHNIQUES; SULFURIC ACID HYDROLYSIS;

CELLULOSE;

ABSORPTION; CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; FOURIER ANALYSIS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MOISTURE; PARTICLE SIZE; RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY; REFRACTIVITY; REFRACTOMETERS; SULFURIC ACID; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 84860394646     PISSN: 00157473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.13073/0015-7473-61.2.104     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Agarwal, U. P., R. S. Reiner, and S. A. Ralph. 2009. Determination of cellulose I crystallinity by FT-Raman spectroscopy. Paper No. P053-ISWFPC-Celulose-Crystallinity. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Wood, Fiber and Pulping Chemistry, June 15-18, 2009, Olso, Norway; Congress-Conference AS, Oslo Norway. http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubsJ337lO. Accessed June 20, 2011.
2. Agarwal, U. P., R. S. Reiner, and S. A. Ralph. 2010. Cellulose I crystallinity determination using FT-Raman spectroscopy: Univariate and multivariate methods. Cellulose 17:721-723.
3. Alemdar, A. and M. Sam. 2008. Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues-Wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresour. Technol. 99(6): 1664-1671.
4. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 1995. Standard method for oil absorption of pigments by spatula rub-out. ASTM D281-95. ASTM, Philadelphia.
5. Arseneau, D. F. 1971. Competitive reactions in the thermal decomposition of cellulose. Can. I Chem. 49(4):632-638.
6. Beck-Candanedo, S., M. Roman, and D. G. Gray. 2005. Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Biomacromolecules 6(2):1048-l054.
7. Bhatnagar, A. and M. Sam. 2005. Processing of cellulose nanofiberreinforced composites. I Reinf PlcisI. Compos. 24:1259-1268.
8. Boiysiak, S. and B. Doczekalska. 2005. X-ray diffraction study of pine wood treated with NaOH. Fibres Textiles East. Eur. 13(5):87-89. (Pubitemid 41800210)
9. Cao, X., H. Dong, and C. M. Li. 2007. New nanocomposite materials reinforced with flax cellulose nanocrystals in waterbome polyurethane biomacromolecules. Biomacromolecules 8(3):899-904. (Pubitemid 46488470)
10. Chen, H.-L. and A. Yokochi. 2000. X-ray diffractometric study of inicrocrystallite size of naturally colored cottons. J. Appi. Polym. Sd. 76:1466-147!. (Pubitemid 30588467)
11. Clowes, F. A. L. and B. E. Juniper. 1968. Plant Cells. Blackwell Scientific, Edinburgh. 546 pp.
12. Côté, W. A. 1964. Cellular Ultrastructure of Woody Plants. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, New York. pp. 1-31, 191-198.
13. Deepa, B., E. Abraham, B. M. Cherian. A. Bismark. J. J. Blaker, L. A. Pothan. A. L. Leao, S. F de Souza. and M. Kottaisamy. 2010. Structure, morphology and thermal characteristics of banana nano fibers obtained by steam explosion. Bioresour. Technol. 102: 1988-1997.
14. Dong, M. X., J. F. Revol, and D. G. Gray. 1998. Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose. Cellulose 5(l):l9-32.
15. Dufresne, A., J. Caville, and M. Vignon. 1997. Mechanical behavior of sheets prepared from sugar beet cellulose microfibrils. J. Appi. Polym. Sd. 64(6):1185-1194. (Pubitemid 127598352)
16. Dufresne. A. and M. Vignon. 1998. Improvement of starch film performances using cellulose microfibrils. Macromolecules 31(8): 2693-2696. (Pubitemid 128577323)
17. Favier, V., G. Canova, J. Y. Cavaille. I-I. Chanzy, A. Dufresne, and C. Gauthier. 1995a. Nanocomposite materials from latex and cellulose whiskers. Polym. Adv. Technol. 6(5):35l-355.
18. Favier, V., H. Chanzy, and J. V. Cavaille. 1995b. Polymer nanocomposites reinforced by cellulose whiskers. Macromolecules 28: 6365-6367.
19. Fengel, D. and G. Wegener. 1984. Wood: Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions. Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin. 613 pp.
20. Fink, H. P., B. Philipp, B. Paul, R. Senmaa. and T. Paakkari. 1987. The structure or amorphous cellulose as revealed by wide-angle x-ray scattering. Polymer 28(8):1265-1270. (Pubitemid 17623251)
21. Grunert, M. and W. T. Winter. 2002. Nanocomposites of ceLlulose acetate butyrate reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals. J. Polym. Environ. I 0(l/2):27-30. (Pubitemid 41444793)
22. Hamad, W. Y. and T. Q. Hu. 2010. Strcuture-process-yield interrelations in nanocrystalline cellulose extraction. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 88: 392-402.
23. Köhler. S. and T. Heinze. 2007. New solvents for cellulose: Dimethyl sulfoxide/ammonium fluorides. Macromol. Biosci. 7(3):307-314. (Pubitemid 47264651)
24. Morgans, Q. M. 1969. Outlines on Paint Technology. Charles Griffin and Company Ltd., London. 224 pp.
25. Nakagaito, A. N. and H. Yano. 2004. The effect of fiber content on the mechanical and thermal expansion properties of biocomposites based on microfibrillated cellulose. AppI. Pivs. A Mater. Sci. Process. 76: 2080-2092.
26. Nishiyama, Y., P. Langan, and H. Chanzy. 2002. Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose 113 from synchrotron x-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. l24(31):9074-9082. (Pubitemid 34847668)
27. Oh, S. V., D. 1. Yoo, V. Shin, H. C. Kim, H. Y. Kim, Y. S. Chung. W. H. Park, and J. H. Youk. 2005. Crystalline structure analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide by means of x-ray diffraction and FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr. Res. 340:2376-2391.
28. Ohad, I. and C. Mejzler. 1965. On the ultrastmcture of cellulose microfibrils. J. Polym. Sd. Part A-i Polvm. Chem. 3(1):399-406.
29. Proniewicz, L. M., C. Paluszkiewicz, A. Weselucha-Birczynska, H. Majcherczyk, A. Baranski, and A. Konieczna. 2001. FT-IR and FTRaman study of hydrothermally degradated cellulose. I. Mol. Struct. 596(l):l63-169.
30. Randriamanantena, T., F. L. Razafindramisa, G. Ramanantsizehena, A. Bemes, and C. Lacabane. 2009. Thermal behaviour of three woods of Madagascar by thermogravimetric analysis in inert atmosphere. In: Proceedings of the Fourth High-Energy Physics International Conference, August 2 1-28, 2009, Antananarivo, Madagascar. http://www.slac. stanford.edu/econf/C09082l l/proceedings.htm. Accessed June 20,2011.
31. Rosa, M. F., F. S. Medeiros, J. A. Malmonge, K. S. Gregorski, D. F. Wood, L. H. C. Mattoso, G. Glenn, W. J. Orts, and S. H. Iman. 2010. Cellulose nanowhiskers from coconut husk fibers: Effect of preparation conditions on their thermal and morphological behavior. Carbohydr. Polym. 81(l):83-92.
32. Rydholm, S. A. 1965. Pulping Processes. Interscience Publishers. New York. pp. 90-156.
33. Saveyn, H. D. Mermuys, 0. Thas, and P. van der Meeren. 2002. Determination of the refractive index of water-dispersible granules for use in laser diffraction experiments. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 19(6): 426-432.
34. Schenzel, K., H. Almlof, and U. Germgãrd. 2008. A new method determining quantitatively the polymorphic transformation, cellulose1 - cellulose II, by utilizing FT Raman data of cellulose pulps. In: Proceedings of the XXlth International Conference on Raman Spectroscopy. August 17-22, 2008, West London; IM Publications, Chichester, West Sussex, UK. p. 797.
35. Wang. H.-Y. and M.-F. Huang. 2007. Preparation, characterization and performances of biodegradable thermoplastic starch. Polym. Adv. Technol. lX(ll):9l0-915.
36. Wiley, J. H. and R. J. Atalla. 1987. Band assignments in the Ratnan spectra of celluloses. Carbohydr. Rex. 160:113-129.
37. Zimmennann, T., E. Pohler, T. Geiger, J. Schleuniger, P. Schwaller, and K. Richter. 2006. Cellulose fibrils: Isolation, characterization, and capability for technical applications. In: Cellulose Nanocomposites: Processing, Characterization, and Properties. K. Oksman and M. Sam (Eds.). ACS Symposium Series 938. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.