Spider predation on a mirid pest in Japanese rice fields

Basic and Applied Ecology

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 532-539

  Kobayashi, Tetsuya ^a   Takada, Mayura ^b   Takagi, Shun ^c   Yoshioka, Akira ^c   Washitani, Izumi ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AGROBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b OBIHIRO UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND VETERINARY MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Biological control; Generalist predator; Gut content analysis; Integrated pest management; Predator prey interactions; Rice

Indexed keywords

ARANEAE; HEMIPTERA; LYCOSIDAE; MIRIDAE; ORYZA SATIVA (JAPONICA CULTIVAR-GROUP); PACHYGNATHA; PIRATA SUBPIRATICUS; STENOTUS RUBROVITTATUS; TETRA; TETRAGNATHA; TETRAGNATHIDAE;

EID: 84860390163     PISSN: 14391791     EISSN: 16180089     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2011.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aldrich J.R. Chemical ecology of the heteroptera. Annual Review Entomology 1988, 33:211-238.
2. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Model selection and multi-model inference: A practical information - theoretic approach 2002, New York, Springer. 2nd ed.
3. Foltan P., Sheppard S., Konvicka M., Symondson W.O.C. The significance of facultative scavenging in generalist predator nutrition: Detecting decayed prey in the guts of predators using PCR. Molecular Ecology 2005, 14:4147-4158.
4. Fournier V., Hagler J., Daane K., de León J., Groves R. Identifying the predator complex of Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): A comparative study of the efficacy of an ELISA and PCR gut content assay. Oecologia 2008, 157:629-640.
5. Greenstone M.H. Spider predation: How and why we study it. Journal of Arachnology 1999, 27:333-342.
6. Greenstone M.H., Hunt J.H. Determination of prey antigen half-life in Polistes metricus using a monoclonal antibody-based immunodot assay. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 1993, 68:1-7.
7. Harwood J.D., Sunderland K.D., Symondson W.O.C. Prey selection by linyphiid spiders: Molecular tracking of the effects of alternative prey on rates of aphid consumption in the field. Molecular Ecology 2004, 13:3549-3560.
8. Higuchi H. Ecology and management of rice bugs causing pecky rice. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 2010, 54:171-188.
9. Hillebrand H., Cardinale B.J. Consumer effects decline with prey diversity. Ecology Letters 2004, 7:192-201.
10. Holling C.S. The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Memoirs of Entomological Society of Canada 1966, 48:1-86.
11. Hoogendoorn M., Heimpel G.E. PCR-based gut content analysis of insect predators: Using ribosomal ITS-1 fragments from prey to estimate predation frequency. Molecular Ecology 2001, 10:2059-2067.
12. Hosseini R., Schmidt O., Keller M.A. Factors affecting detectability of prey DNA in the gut contents of invertebrate predators: A polymerase chain reaction-based method. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2008, 126:194-202.
13. Ishijima C., Taguchi A., Takagi M., Motobayashi T., Nakai M., Kunimi Y. Observational evidence that the diet of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) in paddies temporarily depends on dipterous insects. Applied Entomology and Zoology 2006, 41:195-200.
14. Juen A., Traugott M. Detecting predation and scavenging by DNA gut-content analysis: A case study using a soil insect predator-prey system. Oecologia 2005, 142:344-352.
15. Juen A., Traugott M. Revealing species-specific trophic links in soil food webs: Molecular identification of scarab predators. Molecular Ecology 2007, 16:1545-1557.
16. Kato C., Iwata T., Nakano S., Kishi D. Dynamics of aquatic insect flux affects distribution of riparian web-building spiders. Oikos 2003, 103:113-120.
17. King R.A., Read D.S., Traugott M., Symondson W.O.C. Molecular analysis of predation: A review of best practice for DNA-based approaches. Molecular Ecology 2008, 17:947-963.
18. Kiritani K., Hokyo N., Sasaba T., Nakasuji F. Studies on population dynamics of the green rice leafhopper, Nephotettix cincticeps UHLER: Regulatory mechanism of the population density. Researches on Population Ecology 1970, 7:137-153.
19. Kiritani K., Kawahara S., Sasaba T., Nakasuji F. Quantitative evaluation of predation by spiders on the green rice leafhopper, Nephotettix cincticeps Uhler, by a sight-count method. Research on Population Ecology 1972, 13:187-200.
20. Kratina P., Vos M., Bateman A., Anholt B.R. Functional responses modified by predator density. Oecologia 2009, 159:4235-4433.
21. Kuusk A.K., Cassel-Lundhagen A., Kvarnheden A., Ekbom B. Tracking aphid predation by lycosid spiders in spring-sown cereals using PCR-based gut-content analysis. Basic and Applied Ecology 2008, 9:718-725.
22. Livak K.J. Organization and mapping of a sequence on the Drosophila melanogaster X and Y chromosomes that is transcribed during spermatogenesis. Genetics 1984, 107:611-634.
23. Ma J., Li D., Keller M., Schmidt O., Feng X. A DNA marker to identify predation of Plutella xylostella (Lep., Plutellidae) by Nabis kinbergii (Hem., Nabidae) and Lycosa sp. (Aranaea, Lycosidae). Journal of Applied Ecology 2005, 129:330-335.
24. Mcmillan S., Kuusk A.-K., Cassel-Lundhagen A., Ekbom B. The influence of time and temperature on molecular gut content analysis: Adalia bipunctata fed with Rhopalosiphum padi. Insect Science 2007, 14:353-358.
25. Naranjo S.E., Hagler J.R. Toward the quantification of predation with predator gut immunoassays: A new approach integrating functional response behavior. Biological Control 2001, 20:175-189.
26. Oyama J., Kidokoro T. Effect of predation by spiders on density of the green rice leafhopper, Nephotettix cincticeps, in cool area of Japan. Annual Report of Society of Plant Protection in North Japan 2003, 54:126-129.
27. R Development Core Team A language and environment for statistical computing 2005, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
28. Riechert S.E., Lockley T. Spiders as biological control agents. Annual Review of Entomology 1984, 29:299-320.
29. Riechert S.E., Provencher L., Lawrence K. The potential of spiders to exhibit stable equilibrium point control of prey: Test of two criteria. Ecological Applications 1999, 9:365-377.
30. Roux K.H. Optimization and troubleshooting in PCR. Genome Research 1995, 4:S185-S194.
31. Schenk D., Bacher S. Functional response of a generalist insect predator to one of its prey species in the field. Journal of Animal Ecology 2002, 71:524-531.
32. Settle W.H., Ariawan H., Astuti E.T., Cahyana W., Hakin A.L., Hindanaya D., et al. Managing tropical rice pests through conservation of generalist natural enemies and alternative prey. Ecology 1996, 77:1975-1988.
33. Sheppard S.K., Bell J., Sunderland K.D., Fenlon J., Skervin D., Symondson W.O.C. Detection of secondary predation by PCR analyses of the gut contents of invertebrate generalist predators. Molecular Ecology 2005, 14:4461-4468.
34. Sheppard S.K., Harwood J.D. Advances in molecular ecology: Tracking trophic links through predator-prey food-webs. Functional Ecology 2005, 19:751-762.
35. Sunderland K.D. Quantitative methods for detecting invertebrate predation occurring in the field. Annals of Applied Biology 1988, 112:201-224.
36. Sunderland K. Mechanisms underlying the effects of spiders on pest populations. Journal of Arachnology 1999, 27:308-316.
37. Traugott M., Symondson W.O.C. Molecular analysis of predation on parasitized hosts. Bulletin of Entomological Research 2008, 98:223-231.
38. Tschanz B., Bersier L-F., Bacher S. Functional responses: A question of alternative prey and predator density. Ecology 2007, 82:217-225.
39. Van den Berg H., Ankasah D., Muhammad A., Rusli R., Widayanto H.A., Wirasto H.B., et al. Evaluating the role of predation in population fluctuations of the Soybean aphid Aphis glycines in farmer's fields in Indonesia. Journal of Applied Ecology 1997, 34:971-984.
40. von Berg K., Traugott M., Symondson W.O.C., Scheu S. The effects of temperature on detection of prey DNA in two species of carabid beetle. Bulletin of Entomological Research 2008, 98:263-269.