Performance-Related Specifications for PCC Pavements in Kansas

Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 479-487

  Gedafa, Daba S ^a   Hossain, Mustaque ^b   Ingram, Lon S ^c   Kreider, Rick ^c  

^a University of North Dakota   (United States)

^b Kansas State University   (United States)

^c Kansas Department of Transportation   (United States)

Author keywords

Composite index; Performance related specifications (PRS); Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements

Indexed keywords

AIR CONTENT; COMBINED EFFECT; COMPOSITE INDEX; HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION; INTEGRAL PART; KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONS; LOT SIZE; MICROSOFT EXCEL; PERFORMANCE MODEL; PERFORMANCE-RELATED SPECIFICATIONS; PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENTS; QUALITY CHARACTERISTIC; QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCES;

HIGHWAY ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE TESTING; SPECIFICATIONS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

PAVEMENTS;

CEMENT; CONCRETE STRUCTURE; DATABASE; PAVEMENT; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; ROAD CONSTRUCTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

KANSAS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84860382030     PISSN: 08991561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000405     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Afferton K.C. Freidenrich J. Weed R.M. Managing quality: Time for national policy. 1992, 3-39. and Transportation Research Record No. 1340, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
2. Burati J.L. Weed R.M. Estimating percent within limits for skewed populations. 2006, 71-81. and Transportation Research Record 1946, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
3. Burati L. Weed R.M. Hughes C.S. Hill H.S. Optimal procedures for quality assurance specifications. 2003, and Final Rep. No. FHWA-RD-02-095, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), McLean, VA.
4. Diwan R.M. Shah S. Eggers J. Statistical quality control and quality assurance evaluation of structural and paving concrete. 2003, 71-85. and Transportation Research Record 1861, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
5. Katicha S.W. Flintsch G.W. McGhee K. Izeppi E.D. L. Variability and normality assumptions for Virginia Department of Transportation volumetric properties: Analysis of contractor data. 2011, and Transportation Research Record 2228, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
6. Khanum T. Neil J.W. Hossain M. Ingram L.S. Effect of JPCP performance on PCC quality control/quality assurance specifications. 2006, and Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
7. Parker F. Hossain M.S. Statistics for superpave HMA construction QC/QA data. 2002, 151-156. and Transportation Research Record 1813, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
8. Pratico F.G. Quality and timeliness in highway construction contracts: new acceptance model based on both mechanical and surface performance of flexible pavements. Constr. Manage. Econ. 2007, 25(3):305-313. CMECF3, 0144-6193, 10.1080/01446190601042426.
9. Schell H. Konecny J. Development of an end-result specification for air void parameters of hardened concrete in Ontario's highway structures. 2003, and Transportation Research Board 82nd Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
10. Schmitt R.L. Russell J.S. Hanna A.S. Bahia H.U. Jung G.A. Summary of current quality control/quality assurance practices for hot-mix asphalt construction. 1998, 22-31. and Transportation Research Record 1632, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
11. Performance-related specifications for highway construction and rehabilitation. 1995, Transportation Research Board (TRB), NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 212, Washington, DC.
12. Glossary of highway quality terms. 2002, Transportation Research Board (TRB), Transportation Research Circular No. E-C037, Washington, DC.
13. "Analysis of variance.". 2010, University of California-Davis (UCDAVIS), (Nov. 28, 2010).
14. Uddin M. Goodrum P.M. Mahboub K.C. Severity of non-normality in pavement quality assurance acceptance quality characteristics data and the adverse effects on acceptance and pay. 2011, 70-77. and Transportation Research Record 2228, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
15. Weed R.M. Statistical specification development. 1989, Report No. FHWA/NJ-88-017., 2nd Ed., New Jersey Dept. of Transportation, Trenton, NJ.
16. Weed R.M. Development of composite quality measures. 2000, 103-108. Transportation Research Record 1712, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
17. Weed R.M. Derivation of equation for cost of premature pavement failure. 2001, 93-96. Transportation Research Record 1761, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
18. Weed R.M. Mathematical modeling of pavement smoothness. 2002, 159-163. Transportation Research Record 1813, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
19. Weed R.M. Multi-characteristic performance-related specification for hot-mix asphalt pavement: Complete development process. 2003, 53-59. Transportation Research Record 1861, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
20. Weed R.M. Mathematical modeling procedures for performance-related specifications. 2006, 63-70. Transportation Research Record 1946, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
21. Weed R.M. Tabrizi K. Conceptual framework for pavement smoothness specification. 2005, and Transportation Research Board 84th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.