Does grasping in patient D.F. depend on vision?

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 256-257

  Milner, A David ^a   Ganel, Tzvi ^b   Goodale, Melvyn A ^c  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAPTIC FEEDBACKS; PERCEPTION-ACTION;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; SHORT SURVEY; TACTILE FEEDBACK; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; HYPOXIA, BRAIN; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 84860378620     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.004     Document Type: Short Survey

References (8)

1. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci. 1992, 15:20-25.
2. James T.W., et al. Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: a fMRI study. Brain 2003, 126:2463-2475.
3. Schenk T. No dissociation between perception and action in patient DF when haptic feedback is withdrawn. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:2013-2017.
4. Goodale M.A., et al. A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 1991, 349:154-156.
5. Goodale M.A., et al. Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32:1159-1178.
6. Westwood D.A. Grasping two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects in visual-form agnosia. Exp. Brain Res. 2002, 144:262-267.
7. Goodale M.A., et al. The nature and limits of orientation and pattern processing supporting visuomotor control in a visual form agnosic. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1994, 6:46-56.
8. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The Visual Brain in Action 2006, Oxford University Press. 2nd edn.