Is exposure to an effective contingency management intervention associated with more positive provider beliefs?

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 356-365

  Kirby, Kimberly C ^a,b   Carpenedo, Carolyn M ^a   Stitzer, Maxine L ^c   Dugosh, Karen L ^a   Petry, Nancy M ^d   Roll, John M ^e   Saladin, Michael E ^f   Cohen, Allan J ^g   Hamilton, John ^h   Reese, Karen ⁱ   Sillo, Gina R ^j   Stabile, Patricia Quinn ^k   Sterling, Robert C ^l  

^a TREATMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^g Research and Treatment Inc   (United States)

^h Regional Network of Programs Inc   (United States)

ⁱ Man Alive Inc   (United States)

^j PATTON STATE HOSPITAL   (United States)

^k Harbel Prevention and Recovery Center   (United States)

^l THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Cocaine dependence; Contingency management; Methamphetamine use disorders; Translational research; Treatment dissemination

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST; HEALTH CARE DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMBURSEMENT;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; COUNSELING; DATA COLLECTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 84860364869     PISSN: 07405472     EISSN: 18736483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Armitage C.J., Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology 2001, 40:471-499.
2. Benishek L.A., Kirby K.C., Dugosh K.L., Padovano A. Beliefs about the empirical support of drug abuse treatment interventions: A survey of outpatient treatment providers. Drug & Alcohol Dependence 2010, 107:202-208.
3. Bride B.E., Abraham A.J., Roman P.M. Organizational factors associated with the use of contingency management in publicly funded substance abuse treatment centers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2011, 40:87-94.
4. Carpenedo C.M., Kirby K.C., Dugosh K.L., Rosenwasser B.J., Thompson D.L. Extended voucher-based reinforcement therapy for long-term drug abstinence. American Journal of Health Behavior 2010, 34:776-787.
5. Castells X., Kosten T.R., Capella D., Vidal X., Colom J., Casas M. Efficacy of opiate maintenance therapy and adjunctive interventions for opioid dependence with comorbid cocaine use disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse 2009, 35:339-349.
6. Chambless D.L., Ollendick T.H. Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology 2001, 52:685-716.
7. Department of Health (England) and the devolved administrations Drug misuse and dependence: UK guidelines on clinical management 2007, Department of Health (England), the Scottish Government, Welsh Assembly Government and Northern Ireland Executive, London. http://www.nta.nhs.uk/publications/documents/clinical_guidelines_2007.pdf.
8. Diggle P.J., Heagerty P.J., Liang K.-Y., Zeger S.L. Analysis of longitudinal data (2nd edition), Oxford Statistical Science Series #25 2002, Oxford University Press Inc., New York.
9. Ducharme L.J., Knudsen H.K., Abraham A.J., Roman P.M. Counselor attitudes toward the use of motivational incentives in addiction treatment. The American Journal on Addictions 2010, 19:496-503.
10. Ghitza U.E., Epstein D.H., Schmittner J., Vahabzadeh M., Lin J.L., Preston K.L. Effect of reinforcement probability and prize size on cocaine and heroin abstinence in prize-based contingency management. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2008, 41:539-549.
11. Griffiths R.R., Bigelow G.E., Henningfield J.E. Similarities in animal and human drug taking behavior. Advances in substance abuse: Behavioral and biological research 1980, 1-90. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT. N.K. Mello (Ed.).
12. Henggeler S.W., Chapman J.E., Rowland M.D., Halliday-Boykins C.A., Randall J., Schakelford J., et al. If you build it, they will come: Statewide practitioner interest in contingency management for youths. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2008, 32:121-131.
13. Henggeler S.W., Chapman J.E., Rowland M.D., Halliday-Boykins C.A., Randall J., Schakelford J., et al. State-wide adoption and initial implementation of contingency management for substance-abusing adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2008, 76:556-567.
14. Herbeck D.M., Hser Y.I., Teruya C. Empirically supported substance abuse treatment approaches: A survey of treatment providers' perspectives and practices. Addictive Behaviors 2008, 33:699-712.
15. Higgins S.T., Alessi S.M., Dantona R.L. Voucher-based incentives. A substance abuse treatment innovation. Addictive Behaviors 2002, 27:887-910.
16. Higgins S.T., Badger G.J., Budney A.J. Initial abstinence and success in achieving longer term cocaine abstinence. Experimental & Clinical Psychopharmacology 2000, 8:377-386.
17. Higgins S.T., Heil S.H., Lussier J.P. Clinical implications of reinforcement as a determinant of substance use disorders. Annual Review of Psychology 2004, 55:431-461.
18. Kellogg S.W., Burns M., Coleman P., Stitzer M., Wale J.B., Kreek M.J. Something of value: The introduction of contingency management interventions into New York City health and hospital addiction treatment service. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2005, 28:57-65.
19. Khanna R., Kavookjian J., Scott V.G., Kamal K.M., Miller L.A., Neal W.A. Using the theory of reasoned action to determine physicians' intention to measure body mass index in children and adolescents. Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy 2009, 5:170-181.
20. Kirby K.C., Amass L., McLellan A.T. Disseminating contingency-management research to drug abuse treatment practitioners. Motivating behavior change among illicit-drug abusers: Contemporary research on contingency-management interventions 1999, 327-344. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C. S.T. Higgins, K. Silverman (Eds.).
21. Kirby K.C., Benishek L.A., Dugosh K.L., Kerwin M.L.E. Substance abuse treatment providers' beliefs and objections regarding contingency management: Implications for dissemination. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2006, 85:19-27.
22. Kirby K.C., Kerwin M.E., Carpenedo C.M., Rosenwasser B.J., Gardner R.S. Interdependent group contingency management for cocaine-dependent methadone maintenance patients. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2008, 41:579-595.
23. Ledgerwood D.M., Alessi S.M., Hanson T., Godley M.D., Petry N.M. Contingency management for attendance to group substance abuse treatment administered by clinicians in community clinics. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2008, 41:517-526.
24. Lussier J.P., Heil S.H., Mongeon J.A., Badger G.J., Higgins S.T. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction 2006, 101:192-203.
25. McGovern M.P., Carroll K.M. Evidence-based practices for substance use disorders. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 2003, 26:991-1010.
26. McGovern M.P., Fox T.S., Xie H., Drake R.E. A survey of practice and readiness to adopt evidence-based practices: Dissemination research in an addiction treatment system. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2004, 26:305-312.
27. McLellan A.T. Moving toward a "third generation" of contingency management studies in the abuse treatment field: Comment on Silverman et al. (2001). Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2001, 9:29-32. [discussion 35-29].
28. McLellan A.T., Carise D., Kleber H.D. Can the national addiction treatment infrastructure support the public's demand for quality care?. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2003, 25:117-121.
29. Norman P., Armitage C.J., Quigley C. The theory of planned behavior and binge drinking: Assessing the impact of binge drinker prototypes. Addictive Behaviors 2007, 32:1753-1768.
30. Olmstead T.A., Sindelar J.L., Peirce J.M. Cost-effectiveness of prize-based contingency management in methadone maintenance treatment programs. Addiction 2007, 102:1463-1471.
31. Olmstead T.A., Sindelar J.L., Petry N.M. Clinic variation in the cost-effectiveness of contingency management. The American Journal on Addictions 2007, 16:457-460.
32. Olmstead T.A., Sindelar J.L., Petry N.M. Cost-effectiveness of prize-based incentives for stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2007, 87:175-182.
33. Peirce J.M., Petry N.M., Stitzer M.L., Blaine J., Kellogg S., Satterfield F., et al. Lower-cost incentives increase stimulant abstinence in methadone maintenance treatment: A National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network study. Archives of General Psychiatry 2006, 30:173-181.
34. Petry N.M. Challenges in the transfer of contingency management techniques: Comment on Silverman et al. (2001). Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2001, 9(1):24-26. [discussion 35-29].
35. Petry N.M., Martin B. Low-cost contingency management for treating cocaine- and opioid-abusing methadone patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2002, 70:398-405.
36. Petry N.M., Peirce J.M., Stitzer M.L., Blaine J., Roll J.M., Cohen A., et al. Effect of prize-based incentives on outcomes in stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs: A national drug abuse treatment Clinical Trials Network study. Archives of General Psychiatry 2005, 62:1148-1156.
37. Petry N.M., Simcic F. Recent advances in the dissemination of contingency management techniques: Clinical and research perspectives. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2002, 23:81-86.
38. Ritter A., Cameron J. Contingency management: Perspectives of Australian service providers. Drug and Alcohol Review 2007, 26:183-189.
39. Roll J.M., Madden G.J., Rawson R.R., Petry N.M. Facilitating the adoption of contingency management for the treatment of substance use disorders. Behavior Analysis in Practice 2009, 2:4-13.
40. Sable M.R., Schwartz L.R., Kelly P.J., Lisbon E., Hall M.A. Using the theory of reasoned action to explain physician intention to prescribe emergency contraception. Perspectives on Sexual & Reproductive Health 2006, 38:20-27.
41. Silverman K., Robles E., Mudric T., Bigelow G.E., Stitzer M.L. A randomized trial of long-term reinforcement of cocaine abstinence in methadone-maintained patients who inject drugs. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 2004, 72:839-854.
42. Sindelar J., Elbel B., Petry N.M. What do we get for our money? Cost-effectiveness of adding contingency management. Addiction 2007, 102:309-316.
43. Willenbring M.L., Kivlahan D., Kenny M., Grillo M., Hagedorn H., Postier A. Beliefs about evidence-based practices in addiction treatment: A survey of Veterans Administration program leaders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2004, 26:79-85.