Response to Milner et al.: Grasping uses vision and haptic feedback

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 258-259

  Schenk, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FINGER; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SHORT SURVEY; TACTILE FEEDBACK; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 84860360771     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.006     Document Type: Short Survey

References (10)

1. Schenk T. No dissociation between perception and action in patient D.F. when haptic feedback is withdrawn. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:2013-2017.
2. Goodale M.A., et al. A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 1991, 349:154-156.
3. Smeets J.B.J., Brenner E. A new view on grasping. Motor Control 1999, 3:237-271.
4. Bingham G., et al. Natural prehension in trials without haptic feedback but only when calibration is allowed. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:288-294.
5. Mon-Williams M., Bingham G.P. Calibrating reach distance to visual targets. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2007, 33:645-656.
6. Schenk T. An allocentric rather than perceptual deficit in patient D.F. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9:1345-1457.
7. Westwood D.A., et al. Grasping two-dimensional images and three-dimensional objects in visual-form agnosia. Exp. Brain Res. 2002, 144:262-267.
8. Smeets J.B.J., et al. Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes. Exp. Brain Res. 2002, 147:135-144.
9. Ganel T., et al. Visual coding for action violates fundamental psychophysical principles. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:R599-R601.
10. Smeets J.B.J., Brenner E. Grasping Weber's law. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:R1089-R1090.