Different scalding techniques do not affect boar taint

Meat Science

Volumn 91, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 435-440

  Mörlein, Daniel ^a   Grave, Anne ^a   Sharifi, Ahmad Reza ^a   Bücking, Mark ^b   Wicke, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND APPLIED ECOLOGY IME   (Germany)

Author keywords

Boar taint; Castration; Consumer acceptance; Duroc; Scalding; Slaughter technology

Indexed keywords

BOAR TAINT; CASTRATION; CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE; DUROC; SCALDING;

GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY;

TANKS (CONTAINERS);

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE;

ANDROSTANE DERIVATIVE; INDOLE; INDOLE DERIVATIVE; SKATOLE; WATER;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CHEMISTRY; FAT INTAKE; HEAT; MALE; MEAT; ODOR; SLAUGHTERHOUSE; SWINE;

ABATTOIRS; ADIPOSE TISSUE; ANDROSTENES; ANIMALS; DIETARY FATS; HOT TEMPERATURE; INDOLES; MALE; MEAT; ODORS; POSTMORTEM CHANGES; SKATOLE; SWINE; WATER;

EID: 84860338899     PISSN: 03091740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.02.028     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aluwé M., Bekaert K.M., Tuyttens F.A.M., Vanhaecke L., De Smet S., De Brabander H.F., et al. Influence of soiling on boar taint in boars. Meat Science 2011, 87(3):175-179. The American Meat Science Association. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.10.005.
2. Ampuero Kragten S., Verkuylen B., Dahlmans H., Hortos M., Garcia-Regueiro J.A., Dahl E., et al. Inter-laboratory comparison of methods to measure androstenone in pork fat. Animal 2011, 5(10):1634-1642. 10.1017/S1751731111000553.
3. Bee G., Ampuero S. Wie hat die elektronische Nase gelernt, den Ebergeruch zu erkennen?. KTBL Schrift 2008, 469:60-66.
4. Bonneau M., Chevillon P. Acceptability of entire male pork with various levels of androstenone and skatole by consumers according to their sensitivity to androstenone. Meat Science 2011, Elsevier Ltd. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.07.019.
5. Chen G., Zamaratskaia G., Madej A., Lundstrom K. Effect of hCG administration on the relationship between testicular steroids and indolic compounds in fat and plasma in entire male pigs. Meat Science 2006, 72(2):339-347. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.08.004.
6. Claus R., Weiler U., Herzog A. Physiological aspects of androstenone and skatole formation in the boar-A review with experimental data. Meat Science 1994, 38(2):289-305. 10.1016/0309-1740(94)90118-X.
7. Dehnhard M., Claus R., Herbert E., Hillenbrand M. Skatol- und Androstenonkonzentrationen in Fleischerzeugnissen aus Eberschlachtkörpern. Angewandte Wissenschaft Heft 449. Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten 1994, 55-71.
8. European Declaration on alternatives to surgical castration Retrieved September 14, 2011, from. http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/farm/initiatives_en.htm.
9. Fernandez R., Fernandez G. Validating the Bland-Altman method of agreement. SAS Conference Proceedings: Western Users of SAS Software 2009. San Jose, California 2009, Retrieved from. http://www.lexjansen.com/wuss/2009/pos/POS-Fernandez.pdf.
10. Fischer J., Elsinghorst P., Bücking M., Tholen E., Petersen B., Matthias W. Development of a candidate reference method for the simultaneous quantitation of the boar taint compounds androstenone, 3a-androstenol, 3β-androstenol, skatole, and indole in pig fat by means of stable isotope dilution analysis-headspace solid-phase micro. Analytical Chemistry 2011, 83:6785-6791.
11. Fleischhygiene-Verordnung Verordnung über die hygienischen Anforderungen und amtlichen Untersuchungen beim Verkehr mit Fleisch. Bundesgesetzblatt, 1366 2001.
12. Frieden L., Mörlein D., Meier-Dinkel L., Boeker P., Tholen E. Boar taint levels and performance data in Pietrain sired crossbred males in Germany. 61st Annual EAAP Meeting, Heraklion 2010, 142.
13. Haugen J., Brunius C., Zamaratskaia G. Review of analytical methods to measure boar taint compounds in porcine adipose tissue: The need for harmonised methods. Meat science 2011, Elsevier Ltd. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.07.005.
14. Lunde K., Skuterud E., Hersleth M., Egelandsdal B. Norwegian consumers' acceptability of boar tainted meat with different levels of androstenone or skatole as related to their androstenone sensitivity. Meat Science 2010, 86(3):706-711. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.06.009.
15. Lunde K., Skuterud E., Nilsen A., Egelandsdal B. A new method for differentiating the androstenone sensitivity among consumers. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20(4):304-311. Elsevier Ltd. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.02.001.
16. Lundström K., Matthews K.R., Haugen J.E. Pig meat quality from entire males. Animal 2009, 3(11):1497-1507. 10.1017/S1751731109990693.
17. Maribo H., Olsen E.V., Barton-gade P. Comparison of dehiding versus scalding and singeing: Effect on temperature, pH and meat quality in pigs. Meat Science 1998, 50(2):175-189.
18. Monin G., Talmant A. Effects on carcass weight and meat quality of pigs dehaired by scalding or singeing post-mortem. Meat Science 1995, 39:247-254.
19. Mörlein D., Link G., Werner C., Wicke M. Suitability of three commercially produced pig breeds in Germany for a meat quality program with emphasis on drip loss and eating quality. Meat Science 2007, 77(4):504-511. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.04.030.
20. Patterson R.L.S. Acidic components of boar preputial fluid. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1968, 19:38-40.
21. Rosenvold K. Factors of significance for pork quality-A review. Meat Science 2003, 64(3):219-237. 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00186-9.
22. Zamaratskaia G., Squires E. Biochemical, nutritional and genetic effects on boar taint in entire male pigs. Animal 2009, 3(11):1508-1521. 10.1017/S1751731108003674.