Quantitative analysis and interpretation of transient electromagnetic data via principal component analysis

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Volumn 50, Issue 5 PART 2, 2012, Pages 1910-1918

  Andy Kass, M ^a   Li, Yaoguo ^a  

^a Department of Geology and Geological Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification algorithms; electromagnetics; geophysical signal processing; principal component analysis (PCA); projection algorithms

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; ELECTROMAGNETICS; GEOPHYSICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS (PCA); PROJECTION ALGORITHMS;

ALGORITHMS; COVARIANCE MATRIX; GEOPHYSICS; SEPARATION; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHM; ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD; NOISE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 84860327896     PISSN: 01962892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2011.2167978     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. S. Hirata, "Military munitions support services workshop FUDS update," presented at FUDS Workshop, 2009, US Army Corps of Engineers. Slide show.
2. OASA (I&E). (2002). The army environmental quality technology program A(1.6a) UXO screening, detection, and discrimination management plan, U.S. Dept. Army, Arlington County, VA, Tech. Rep., accessed on Sep. 08 2010. [Online]. Available: http://el.erdc.usace. army.mil/uxo/pdfs/uxoplan.pdf
3. J. McNeill and M. Bosnar, "Application of TDEM techniques to metal detection and discrimination," Geonics Ltd., Mississauga, ON, Canada, 2000, vol. Tech. Note TN-32.
4. I. Jones and S. Levy, "Signal-to-noise ratio enhancement in multichannel seismic data via the Karhunen-Loéve transform," Geophys. Prospecting, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 12-32, Jan. 1987.
5. B. Minty and J. Hovgaard, "Reducing noise in gamma-ray spectrometry using spectral component analysis," Exploration Geophys., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 172-176, 2002.
6. G. Jackson, I. Mason, and S. Greenhalgh, "Principal component transforms of triaxial recordings by singular value decomposition," Geophysics, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 528-533, Apr. 1991.
7. A. Green, "The use of multivariate statistical techniques for the analysis and display of AEM data," Exploration Geophys., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 77-82, 1998.
8. L. Worrall, T. Munday, and A. Green, "Beyond bump finding: Airborne electromagnetics for mineral exploration in regolith-dominated terrains," Exploration Geophys., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 199-203, 1998.
9. M. Asten, "Use of principal component images for classification of the EM response of unexploded ordnance," in Proc. Expanded Abstracts ASEG 20th Int. Conf. Exhib., Adelaide, Australia, 2009.
10. F. Shubitidze, I. Shamatava, A. Bijamov, B. Barrowes, and K. O'Neill, "Camp Butner UXO data inversion and classification using advanced EMI models: SERDP project MR-1572," in Proc. SERDP Symp., Washington, DC, 2010.
11. W. Hu and L. Collins, "Classification of closely spaced subsurface objects using electromagnetic induction data and blind source separation algorithms," Radio Sci., vol. 39, p. RS4 S07, Jun. 2004.
12. W. Hu, S. L. Tantum, and L. M. Collins, "EMI-based classification of multiple closely spaced subsurface objects via independent component analysis," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 2544-2554, Nov. 2004.
13. C. S. Throckmorton, S. L. Tantum, Y. Tan, and L. M. Collins, "Independent component analysis for UXO detection in highly cluttered environments," J. Appl. Geophys., vol. 61, no. 3/4, pp. 204-317, Mar. 2007.
14. S. L. Rose-Pehrsson, R. E. Shaffer, J. R. McDonald, H. H. Nelson, R. E. Grimm, and T. A. Sprott, "UXO target detection using magnetometry and EM survey data," in Proc. SPIE, 1998, vol. 3534, pp. 496-507.
15. G. Strang, Linear Algebra and Its Applications. New York: Academic, 1976.
16. H. Kramer and M. Mathews, "A linear coding for transmitting a set of correlated signals," IRE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 41-46, Sep. 1956.
17. L. Pasion, S. Billings, and D. Oldenburg, "Evaluating the effects of magnetic susceptibility in UXO discrimination problems," in Proc. SAGEEP, Las Vegas, NV, 2002.
18. T. Asch, D. Wright, W. Moulton, T. Irons, and M. Nabighian, "ALLTEM UXO detection and discrimination," in Proc. 78th SEG Int. Meeting, Expanded Abstracts 27, Las Vegas, NV, 2008.
19. C. Eckart and G. Young, "The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank," Psychomatrika, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 211-218, Sep. 1936.
20. G. Buselli, "The effect of near-surface superparamagnetic material on electromagnetic measurements," Geophysics, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1315-1324, Sep. 1982.
21. M. Kass, T. Irons, and Y. Li, "Inversion of multi-channel data with rotated kernels," in Proc. 79th SEG Int. Meeting, Expanded Abstracts 28, Houston, TX, 2009.
22. K. Kingdon, L. Pasion, and D. Oldenburg, "Investigating the effects of soils with complex magnetic susceptibility on EMI measurements using numerical modelling of Maxwell's equations," in Proc. SPIE, 2009, vol. 7303, p. 730 30Q.
23. L. Pasion and D. Oldenburg, "A discrimination algorithm for UXO using time domain electromagnetics," J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 91, Jun. 2001.
24. S. Butterworth, "On the theory of filter amplifiers," Wirel. Eng., vol. 7, pp. 536-541, 1930.
25. J. Karl, An Introduction to Digital Signal Processing. New York: Academic, 1989.
26. UXOLab: UXO Detection and Discrimination Software, version 1.2.01, UBC-Geophysical Inversion Facility, Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada: Univ. Brit. Columbia, 2009.