Expected utility theory and the tyranny of catastrophic risks

Ecological Economics

Volumn 77, Issue , 2012, Pages 234-239

  Buchholz, Wolfgang ^a   Schymura, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN ECONOMIC RESEARCH ZEW   (Germany)

Author keywords

Catastrophic risks; Expected Utility Theory

Indexed keywords

CATASTROPHIC EVENT; CLIMATE CHANGE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; EUROPEAN UNION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84860315999     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allais M. Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l'école Américaine. Econometrica 1953, 51:503-546.
2. Arrow K.J. Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing 1965, Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö, Helsinki.
3. Baumgärtner S., Becker C., Frank K., Müller B., Quaas M. Relating the philosophy and practice of ecological economics: the role of concepts, models, and case studies in inter- and transdisciplinary sustainability research. Ecological Economics 2008, 67:384-393.
4. Brännmark W., Sahlin N.-E. Ethical theory and the philosophy of risk: first thoughts. Journal of Risk Research 2010, 13:149-161.
5. Buchholz W., Schumacher J. Discounting and welfare analysis over time: choosing the η. European Journal of Political Economy 2010, 26:372-385.
6. Chichilnisky G. An axiomatic approach to choice under uncertainty with catastrophic risks. Resource and Energy Economics 2000, 22:221-231.
7. Chichilnisky G. Topology of fear. Journal of Mathematical Economics 2009, 45:807-816.
8. Dasgupta P. Discounting climate change. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2008, 37:141-169.
9. Dasgupta P. The ethics of intergenerational distribution: reply and response to John E. Roemer. Environmental and Resource Economics 2011, 50:141-169.
10. Dietz S., Maddison D.J. New frontiers in the economics of climate change. Environmental and Resource Economics 2009, 43:295-306.
11. Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity and the savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1961, 75:643-669.
12. Epstein L.G., Zin S.E. Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption growth and asset returns I: a theoretical framework. Econometrica 1989, 57:937-969.
13. Fleurbaey M. Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare 2008, Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
14. Gollier C. The Economics of Risk and Time 2001, MIT Press, Cambridge USA.
15. Harsanyi J.C. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy 1955, 63:309-321.
16. Ikefuji M., Laeven R.J.A., Magnus J.R., Muris C. Expected Utility and Catastrophic Risk. Working Paper 2010, Tilburg University.
17. Krysiak F. Sustainability and its relation to efficiency under uncertainty. Economic Theory 2009, 41:297-315.
18. Menger K. Das Unsicherheitsmoment in der Wertlehre. Betrachtungen in Anschluss an das sogenannte Petersburger Spiel. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 1934, 5:459-485.
19. Nordhaus W. Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change 1994, MIT Press, Cambridge, USA.
20. Nordhaus W. A Question of Balance 2008, Yale University Press, New Haven, USA.
21. Nordhaus W. The economics of tail events with an application to climate change. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2011, 5:240-257.
22. Parson E. The big one: a review of Richard Posner's catastrophe: risk and response. Journal of Economic Literature 2007, 45:147-164.
23. Pindyck R. Fat tails, thin tails, and climate change policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2011, 5:258-274.
24. Posner R. Catastrophe: Risk and Response 2004, Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
25. Rabin M. Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: a calibration theorem. Econometrica 2000, 68:1281-1292.
26. Roemer J. Theories of Distributive Justice 1996, Harvard University Press, Cambridge USA.
27. Shaw D.W., Woodward R.T. Why environmental and resource economists should care about non-expected utility models. Resource and Energy Economics 2008, 30:66-89.
28. Smith J.B., Schneider S.H., Oppenheimer M., Yohe G.W., Hare W., Mastrandrea M.D., Patwardhan A., Burton I., Corfee-morlot J., Magadza C.H.D., Füssel H.M., Pittock A.B., Rahman A., Suarez A., Ypersele J.-P. Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) "reasons for concern". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106:4133-4137.
29. Smith K. Stern, climate policy and saving rates. Climate Policy 2011, 10:289-297.
30. Stern N. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review 2006, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
31. Sugden R. Alternatives to Expected Utility Theory: Foundations and Concepts. Handbook of Expected Utility Theory 1997, Kluwer, Boston, Mass. S. Barbera, P.J. Hammond, C. Seidl (Eds.).
32. Sunstein C.R. Worst-Case Scenarios 2007, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA.
33. Weitzman M. A review of the Stern Review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature 2007, 45:703-724.
34. Weitzman M. On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. The Review of Economics and Statistics 2009, 91:1-19.
35. Weitzman M. Reactions to the Nordhaus Critique. Harvard University Working Paper 2009.
36. Weitzman M. How Should the Distant Future be Discounted When Discount Rates are Uncertain?. Harvard University Working Paper 2009.
37. Weitzman M. Fat-tailed uncertainty in the economics of catastrophic climate change. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2011, 5:275-292.