Agreement and reliability of functional performance and muscle power in patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the hip or knee

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 401-410

  Villadsen, Allan ^a   Roos, Ewa M ^a   Overgaard, Søren ^b   Holsgaard Larsen, Anders ^b  

^a Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy   (Denmark)

^b ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Osteoarthritis; Outcomes; Reliability; Severe

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; EXERCISE TEST; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE STRENGTH; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SKELETAL MUSCLE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EXERCISE TEST; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE STRENGTH; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84860311058     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182465ed0     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Dieppe PA, et al: Osteoarthritis: New insights. Part 1: The disease and its risk factors. Ann Intern Med 2000;133:635-46
2. Zhang W, Nuki G, Moskowitz RW, et al: OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: part III: Changes in evidence following systematic cumulative update of research published through January 2009. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010;18:476-99
3. Fransen M, McConnell S: Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;8: CD004376
4. National Board of Statistics Denmark: Population prognosis 2001-2040. National Board of Statistics Denmark. Available at www.sst.dk. Accessed January 5, 2001.
5. Altman R, Brandt K, Hochberg M, et al: Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis: Recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society. Results from a workshop. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1996;4:217-43 (Pubitemid 26408292)
6. Thorstensson CA, Roos EM, Petersson IF, et al: Sixweek high-intensity exercise program for middleaged patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN20244858]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2005;6:27
7. Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Hanna SE, et al: Modeling early recovery of physical function following hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006;7:100
8. Stratford PW, Kennedy DM, Riddle DL: New study design evaluated the validity of measures to assess change after hip or knee arthroplasty. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:347-52
9. Maly MR, Costigan PA, Olney SJ: Determinants of self-report outcome measures in people with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87: 96-104 (Pubitemid 43053312)
10. Terwee CB, van der Slikke RM, van Lummel RC, et al: Self-reported physical functioning was more influenced by pain than performance-based physical functioning in knee-osteoarthritis patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:724-31 (Pubitemid 43825722)
11. Suetta C, Andersen JL, Dalgas U, et al: Resistance training induces qualitative changes in muscle morphology, muscle architecture, and muscle function in elderly postoperative patients. J Appl Physiol 2008;105:180-6
12. Yoshida Y, Mizner RL, Ramsey DK, et al: Examining outcomes from total knee arthroplasty and the relationship between quadriceps strength and knee function over time. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2008;23: 320-8 (Pubitemid 351253719)
13. Robertson S, Frost H, Doll H, et al: Leg extensor power and quadriceps strength: An assessment of repeatability in patients with osteoarthritic knees. Clin Rehabil 1998;12:120-6 (Pubitemid 28223210)
14. Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Wessel J, et al: Assessing stability and change of four performance measures: A longitudinal study evaluating outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2005;6:3
15. McCarthy CJ, Oldham JA: The reliability, validity and responsiveness of an aggregated locomotor function (ALF) score in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004;43:514-7 (Pubitemid 38489371)
16. Gaines JM, Talbot LA: Isokinetic strength testing in research and practice. Biol Res Nurs 1999;1:57-64
17. Knudson DV: Correcting the use of the term Fpower in the strength and conditioning literature. J Strength Cond Res 2009;23:1902-8
18. Suetta C, Aagaard P, Rosted A, et al: Training-induced changes in muscle CSA, muscle strength, EMG, and rate of force development in elderly subjects after longterm unilateral disuse. J Appl Physiol 2004;97:1954-61 (Pubitemid 39426016)
19. Bassey EJ, Fiatarone MA, O'Neill EF, et al: Leg extensor power and functional performance in very old men and women. Clin Sci (Lond) 1992;82:321-7
20. Bean JF, Kiely DK, Herman S, et al: The relationship between leg power and physical performance in mobilitylimited older people. J AmGeriatr Soc 2002;50:461-7 (Pubitemid 34229401)
21. Laroche DP, Knight CA, Dickie JL, et al: Explosive force and fractionated reaction time in elderly lowand high-active women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39:1659-65 (Pubitemid 47360991)
22. Pijnappels M, van der Burg PJ, Reeves ND, et al: Identification of elderly fallers by muscle strength measures. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008;102:585-92
23. Rantanen T, Era P, Heikkinen E: Physical activity and the changes in maximal isometric strength in men and women from the age of 75 to 80 years. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45:1439-45 (Pubitemid 127747112)
24. Clemencon M, Hautier CA, Rahmani A, et al: Potential role of optimal velocity as a qualitative factor of physical functional performance in women aged 72 to 96 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:1594-9
25. Cronin JB, McNair PJ, Marshall RN: Force-velocity analysis of strength-training techniques and load: Implications for training strategy and research. J Strength Cond Res 2003;17:148-55 (Pubitemid 36313326)
26. Bosco C, Belli A, Astrua M, et al: A dynamometer for evaluation of dynamic muscle work. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1995;70:379-86
27. Neeter C, Gustavsson A, Thomee P, et al: Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006;14:571-80 (Pubitemid 43854298)
28. Bassey EJ, Short AH: A new method for measuring power output in a single leg extension: feasibility, reliability and validity. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1990;60:385-90 (Pubitemid 20197282)
29. Blackwell T, Cawthon PM, Marshall LM, et al: Consistency of leg extension power assessments in older men: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2009;88:934-40
30. Fleiss JL. Reliability of measurements, in: The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York, NY, John Wiley and Sons, 1986, pp. 2-31
31. Bremander AB, Dahl LL, Roos EM: Validity and reliability of functional performance tests in meniscectomized patients with or without knee osteoarthritis. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2007;17:120-7
32. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, et al: A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: Association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 1994;49:M85-94 (Pubitemid 24100267)
33. Dalton JA, McNaull F: A call for standardizing the clinical rating of pain intensity using a 0 to 10 rating scale. Cancer Nurs 1998;21:46-9 (Pubitemid 28114407)
34. Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, et al: A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain 1994;56:217-26 (Pubitemid 24067851)
35. Nevitt MC, Felson DT, Lester G: OAI, Protocol for the cohort study. 2009. Available at http://oai.epiucsf. org/datarelease/docs/StudyDesignProtocol.pdf
36. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al: When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1033-9 (Pubitemid 44376776)
37. Holsgaard LA, Caserotti P, Puggaard L, et al: Reproducibility and relationship of single-joint strength vs multi-joint strength and power in aging individuals. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2007;17:43-53
38. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10 (Pubitemid 16134762)
39. Burnett RW: Accurate estimation of standard deviations for quantitative methods used in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem 1975;21:1935-8
40. Weir JP: Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005;19:231-40 (Pubitemid 40417282)
41. Lexell JE, Downham DY: How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84:719-23 (Pubitemid 41248466)
42. Landis JR, Koch GG: Measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74 (Pubitemid 8054849)
43. Vasikaran SD, McCloskey EV, Kahn S, et al: Intra-individual variation in fasting urinary calciumand hydroxyproline-creatinine ratios measured in metabolic bone clinic patients as both outpatients and inpatients. Ann Clin Biochem 1994;31:272-6 (Pubitemid 24167832)
44. Jette AM, Jette DU, Ng J, et al: Are performancebased measures sufficiently reliable for use in multicenter trials? Musculoskeletal Impairment (MSI) Study Group. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1999;54:M3-6 (Pubitemid 29059020)
45. Youdas JW, Mraz ST, Norstad BJ, et al: Determining meaningful changes in hip abductor muscle strength obtained by handheld dynamometry. Physiother Theory Pract 2008;24:215-20 (Pubitemid 351874171)
46. Suetta C, Magnusson SP, Rosted A, et al: Resistance training in the early postoperative phase reduces hospitalization and leads to muscle hypertrophy in elderly hip surgery patientsVa controlled, randomized study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:2016-22 (Pubitemid 41725017)
47. Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, et al: Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med 1996;27:485-9 (Pubitemid 26103814)