Publication bias, retrospective bias, and reproducibility of significant results in observational studies

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 114, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 931-932

  Shafer, Steven L ^a   Dexter, Franklin ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIOLOGY; EDITORIAL; MEDICAL LITERATURE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; HUMANS; PEDIATRICS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 84860285378     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824a0b5b     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Greenberg RS, Bembea M, Heitmiller E. Rainy days for the Society of Pediatric Anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2012;114:1102-3
2. De Oliveira GS Jr, Chang R, Kendall MC, Fitzgerald PC, McCarthy RJ. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature. Anesth Analg 2012;114:1042-8
3. Marshall BJ, Warren JR. Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet 1984;1:1311-5
4. Goodman SN. A comment on replication, p-values and evidence. Stat Med 1992;11:875-9
5. Cumming G. Replication and p intervals: p values predict the future only vaguely, but confidence intervals do much better. Perspect Psychol Sci 2008;3:286-300