|
Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 361-
|
Lyme disease antiscience
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
DIAGNOSTIC ERROR;
HUMAN;
LETTER;
LYME DISEASE;
NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROFESSIONALISM;
SCIENCE;
UNITED KINGDOM;
BORRELIA BURGDORFERI;
CONSUMER ADVOCACY;
ETHICS;
NOTE;
PHYSICIAN;
PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT;
ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;
ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS;
BORRELIA BURGDORFERI;
CONSUMER ADVOCACY;
HUMANS;
LYME DISEASE;
PHYSICIANS;
PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT;
|
EID: 84860282938
PISSN: 14733099
EISSN: 14744457
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70052-X Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (3)
|