Multi-scalar-singlet extension of the standard model - The case for dark matter and an invisible Higgs boson

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2012, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Drozd, A ^a   Grzadkowski, B ^a   Wudka, José ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM; Higgs Physics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860278654     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2012)006     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. N. Jarosik et al., Seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: sky maps, systematic errors and basic results, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192 (2011) 14 [arXiv:1001.4744].
2. M. Veltman and F. Yndurain, Radiative corrections to W W scattering, Nucl. Phys. B 325 (1989) 1.
3. V. Silveira and A. Zee, Scalar phantoms, Phys. Lett. B 161 (1985) 136.
4. J. McDonald, Gauge singlet scalars as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 3637 [hep-ph/0702143].
5. C. Burgess, M. Pospelov and T. ter Veldhuis, The minimal model of nonbaryonic dark matter: a singlet scalar, Nucl. Phys. B 619 (2001) 709 [hep-ph/0011335].
6. M. Bento, O. Bertolami and R. Rosenfeld, Cosmological constraints on an invisibly decaying Higgs boson, Phys. Lett. B 518 (2001) 276 [hep-ph/0103340].
7. H. Davoudiasl, R. Kitano, T. Li and H. Murayama, The new minimal standard model, Phys. Lett. B 609 (2005) 117 [hep-ph/0405097].
8. J. van der Bij, The minimal non-minimal standard model, Phys. Lett. B 636 (2006) 56 [hep-ph/0603082].
9. X.-G. He, T. Li, X.-Q. Li, J. Tandean and H.-C. Tsai, The simplest dark-matter model, CDMS II results and Higgs detection at LHC, Phys. Lett. B 688 (2010) 332 [arXiv:0912.4722].
10. W.-L. Guo and Y.-L. Wu, The Real singlet scalar dark matter model, JHEP 10 (2010) 083 [arXiv:1006.2518].
11. Y. Cai, X.-G. He and B. Ren, Low mass dark matter and invisible Higgs width in darkon models, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 083524 [arXiv:1102.1522].
12. L.J. Hall and Y. Nomura, A finely-predicted Higgs boson mass from a finely-tuned weak scale, JHEP 03 (2010) 076 [arXiv:0910.2235].
13. A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Chakraborty, A. Ghosal and D. Majumdar, Constraining scalar singlet dark matter with CDMS, XENON and DAMA and prediction for direct detection rates, JHEP 11 (2010) 065 [arXiv:1003.0809].
14. C.E. Yaguna, The singlet scalar as FIMP dark matter, JHEP 08 (2011) 060 [arXiv:1105.1654].
15. Y. Mambrini, Higgs searches and singlet scalar dark matter: combined constraints from XENON 100 and the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 115017 [arXiv:1108.0671].
16. M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Higgs decays to dark matter: beyond the minimal model, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 113001 [arXiv:1109.4872].
17. A. Abada, D. Ghaffor and S. Nasri, A two-singlet model for light cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 095021 [arXiv:1101.0365].
18. Y. Mambrini, Invisible Higgs and scalar dark matter, arXiv:1112.0011.
19. A. Djouadi, O. Lebedev, Y. Mambrini and J. Quevillon, Implications of LHC searches for Higgs-portal dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012) 65 [arXiv:1112.3299].
20. B. Grzadkowski and J. Wudka, Pragmatic approach to the little hierarchy problem: the case for dark matter and neutrino physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 091802 [arXiv:0902.0628].
21. B. Grzadkowski and J. Wudka, Naive solution of the little hierarchy problem and its physical consequences, Acta Phys. Polon. B 40 (2009) 3007 [arXiv:0910.4829].
22. B. Grzadkowski and J. Wudka, The uses of singlets, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 259 (2010) 012095.
23. A. Kundu and S. Raychaudhuri, Taming the scalar mass problem with a singlet Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 4042 [hep-ph/9410291].
24. C.F. Kolda and H. Murayama, The Higgs mass and new physics scales in the minimal standard model, JHEP 07 (2000) 035 [hep-ph/0003170].
25. J. Casas, J. Espinosa and I. Hidalgo, Implications for new physics from fine-tuning arguments. 1. Application to SUSY and seesaw cases, JHEP 11 (2004) 057 [hep-ph/0410298].
26. G. Angloher et al., Results from 730 kg days of the CRESST-II dark matter search, arXiv:1109.0702.
27. B.W. Lee, C. Quigg and H. Thacker, Weak interactions at very high-energies: the role of the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1519.
28. G. Cynolter, E. Lendvai and G. Pocsik, Note on unitarity constraints in a model for a singlet scalar dark matter candidate, Acta Phys. Polon. B 36 (2005) 827 [hep-ph/0410102].
29. M. Gonderinger, Y. Li, H. Patel and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Vacuum stability, perturbativity and scalar singlet dark matter, JHEP 01 (2010) 053 [arXiv:0910.3167].
30. B. Grzadkowski and M. Lindner, Stability of triviality mass bounds in the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 178 (1986) 81.
31. M. Veltman, The infrared-ultraviolet connection, Acta Phys. Polon. B 12 (1981) 437.
32. M. Einhorn and D. Jones, The effective potential and quadratic divergences, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 5206.
33. A. Drozd, RGE and the fine-tuning problem, arXiv:1202.0195.
34. ATLAS collaboration, Combined standard model higgs boson searches with up to 2:3 fb 1 of pp collisions at p s = 7TeV at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2011-157 (2011).
35. Particle Data Goup collaboration, K. Nakamura et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 075021.
36. E. Kolb and M. Turner, The early universe, Westview Press, U.S.A.(1994).
37. P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 360 (1991) 145.
38. G. Bertone, Particle dark matter: observations, models and searches, Cambridge University press, Cambridge U.K. (2010).
39. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with MicrOMEGAs 2:2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 747 [arXiv:0803.2360].
40. J. McDonald, Thermally generated gauge singlet scalars as selfinteracting dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 091304 [hep-ph/0106249].
41. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark matter results from 100 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 131302 [arXiv:1104.2549].
42. T. Binoth and J. van der Bij, Inuence of strongly coupled, hidden scalars on Higgs signals, Z. Phys. C 75 (1997) 17 [hep-ph/9608245].
43. R. Akhoury, J. van der Bij and H. Wang, Interplay between perturbative and nonperturbative efects in the stealthy Higgs model, Eur. Phys. J. C 20 (2001) 497 [hep-ph/0010187].
44. S. Kanemura, S. Matsumoto, T. Nabeshima and N. Okada, Can WIMP dark matter overcome the nightmare scenario?, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 055026 [arXiv:1005.5651].
45. S. Kanemura, S. Matsumoto, T. Nabeshima and H. Taniguchi, Testing Higgs portal dark matter via Z fusion at a linear collider, Phys. Lett. B 701 (2011) 591 [arXiv:1102.5147].
46. ATLAS collaboration, Combination of Higgs boson searches with up to 4:9 fb 1 of pp collisions data taken at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2011-163 (2011).
47. CMS collaboration, Combination of SM Higgs searches, PAS-HIG-11-032 (2011).
48. J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D. White, A universal density profile from hierarchical clustering, Astrophys. J. 490 (1997) 493 [astro-ph/9611107].
49. A.A. Klypin, A.V. Kravtsov, O. Valenzuela and F. Prada, Where are the missing galactic satellites?, Astrophys. J. 522 (1999) 82 [astro-ph/9901240].
50. D.N. Spergel and P.J. Steinhardt, Observational evidence for selfinteracting cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 3760 [astro-ph/9909386].
51. B.D. Wandelt et al., Selfinteracting dark matter, astro-ph/0006344.
52. D.E. Holz and A. Zee, Collisional dark matter and scalar phantoms, Phys. Lett. B 517 (2001) 239 [hep-ph/0105284].