Maternal heart rate patterns in the first and second stages of labor

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 598-604

  Van Veen, Teelkien R ^a   Belfort, Michael A ^b   Kofford, Shalece ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b TEXAS CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

contractions; Delivery; fetal monitoring; labor; maternal heart rate

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; FETUS HEART RATE; FETUS MONITORING; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEART RATE; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HUMAN; LABOR STAGE 1; LABOR STAGE 2; MATERNAL HEART RATE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; UTERUS CONTRACTION;

ADULT; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; LABOR STAGE, FIRST; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; PREGNANCY; UTERINE CONTRACTION;

EID: 84860255625     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01371.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ACOG. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114: 192-202.
2. Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T., The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112: 661-6.
3. Hadar A, Sheiner E, Hallak M, Katz M, Mazor M, Shoham-Vardi I., Abnormal fetal heart rate tracing patterns during the first stage of labor: effect on perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185: 863-8.
4. Minkoff H, Berkowitz R., Fetal monitoring bundle. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114: 1332-5.
5. Piquard F, Hsiung R, Mettauer M, Schaefer A, Haberey P, Dellenbach P., The validity of fetal heart rate monitoring during the second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 72: 746-51.
6. Sheiner E, Hadar A, Hallak M, Katz M, Mazor M, Shoham-Vardi I., Clinical significance of fetal heart rate tracings during the second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 97: 747-52.
7. Klapholz H, Schifrin BS, Myrick R., Role of maternal artifact in fetal heart rate pattern interpretation. Obstet Gynecol. 1974; 44: 373-8.
8. Timor-Tritsch I, Gergely Z, Abramovici H, Brandes JM,. Misleading information from fetal monitoring in a case of intrapartum fetal death. Obstet Gynecol. 1974; 43: 713-7.
9. Lackritz R, Schiff I, Gibson M, Safon L., Decelerations on fetal electrocardiography with fetal demise. Obstet Gynecol. 1978; 51: 367-8.
10. Herman A, Ron-El R, Arieli S, Schreyer P, Caspi E., Maternal ECG recorded by internal monitoring closely mimicking fetal heart rate in a recent fetal death. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1990; 33: 269-71.
11. Murray ML,. Maternal or fetal heart rate? Avoiding intrapartum misidentification. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004; 33: 93-104.
12. Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Meyers JA,. Reducing obstetric litigation through alterations in practice patterns. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112: 1279-83.
13. Sherman DJ, Frenkel E, Kurzweil Y, Padua A, Arieli S, Bahar M., Characteristics of maternal heart rate patterns during labor and delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99: 542-7.
14. Odendaal HJ,. False interpretation of fetal heart role monitoring in cases of intra-uterine death. S Afr Med J. 1976; 50: 1963-5.
15. Robson SC, Dunlop W, Boys RJ, Hunter S., Cardiac output during labour. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987; 295: 1169-72.
16. Lackritz R, Schiff I, Gibson M, Safon L., Decelerations on fetal electrocardiography with fetal demise. Obstet Gynecol. 1978; 51: 367-8.
17. Sherer DM, Dalloul M, Pierre N, Abulafia O., Intrapartum repetitive maternal heart rate deceleration pattern simulating nonreassuring fetal status. Am J Perinatol. 2005; 22: 165-7.
18. Timor-Tritsch I, Gergely Z, Abramovici H, Brandes JM,. Misleading information from fetal monitoring in a case of intrapartum fetal death. Obstet Gynecol. 1974; 43: 713-7.
19. Ueland K, Hansen JM,. Maternal cardiovascular dynamics. II. Posture and uterine contractions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969; 103: 1-7.
20. Tanaka H, Monahan KD, Seals DR,. Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 153-6.
21. Lee W, Rokey R, Miller J, Cotton DB,. Maternal hemodynamic effects of uterine contractions by M-mode and pulsed-Doppler echocardiography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 161: 974-7.
22. Goodlin RC,. Importance of the lateral position during labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1971; 37: 698-701.
23. Kinsella SM, Spencer JA, Whitwam JG,. Use of digital arterial pressure to detect aortic compression during labour. Lancet. 1989; ii: 714-5.
24. nd edn. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Massachusetts, USA, 2007.
25. Bieniarz J, Maqueda E, Caldeyro-Barcia R., Compression of aorta by the uterus in late human pregnancy. I. Variations between femoral and brachial artery pressure with changes from hypertension to hypotension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966; 95: 795-808.
26. Hendricks CH,. The hemodynamics of a uterine contraction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1958; 76: 969-82.
27. Ueland K, Hansen JM,. Maternal cardiovascular dynamics. 3. Labor and delivery under local and caudal analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969; 103: 8-18.
28. Junqueira LF, Jr,. Teaching cardiac autonomic function dynamics employing the Valsalva (Valsalva-Weber) maneuver. Adv Physiol Educ. 2008; 32: 100-6.
29. Sohnchen N, Melzer K, Tejada BM, Jastrow-Meyer N, Othenin-Girard V, Irion O, et al,. Maternal heart rate changes during labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 158: 173-8.