On the use of Digital Surface Models and hydrological/hydraulic models for inundated area delineation

Environmental Hydraulics - Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Environmental Hydraulics

Volumn 2, Issue , 2010, Pages 875-880

  Leventi, I ^a   Nalbantis, I ^a   Georgopoulos, A ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDRAULIC MODELS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY;

CRITICAL ISSUES; DIGITAL SURFACE MODELS; FLOOD HAZARDS; FLOW CONDITION; HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING; OPEN CHANNELS; SAINT VENANT EQUATION; UNIT HYDROGRAPH;

FLOODS;

EID: 84860255412     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1201/b10553-144     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Cabral, M. C., Bras, R. L., Tarboton, D. & Entekhabi, D. 1990. A distributed, physically-based, rainfall runoff model incorporating topography for real-time flood forecasting. Ralph M. Parsons Lab. Rep. N. 332. Cambridge, MA: MIT Department of Civil Engineering.
2. Garrote, L. & Bras, R. L. 1995. A distributed model for real-time flood forecasting using digital elevation models. Journal of Hydrology 167: 279-306.
3. Bates, P. D., Marks, K. J. & Horritt, M. S. 2003. Optimal use of high-resolution topographic data in flood inundation models. Hydrolog. Process. 17(3): 537-557.
4. Brasington, J. & Richards, K. 1998. Interactions between model predictions, parameters and DTM scales for top model. Comput. Geosci. 24(4): 299-314.
5. Chaubey, I., Cotter, A. S., Costello, T. A. & Soerens, T. S. 2005. Effect of DEM data resolution on SWAT output uncertainty. Hydrolog. Process. 19(3): 621-628.
6. Koutsoyiannis, D., Kozonis, D.&Manetas, A. 1998.A mathematical framework for studying rainfall intensityduration- frequency relationships. Journal of Hydrology 206: 118-135.
7. Leventi, I. 2008. Assessing flood hazard based on Digital Surface Models. Diploma thesis. Athens: School of Rural & Surveying Engineering, National Technical University of Athens (in Greek).
8. Li, Z., Zhu, Q.&Gold, C. 2005. DigitalTerrain Modeling: Pronciples and Methodology. ISBN 0-415-32462-9, 323 pp., CRC Press.
9. Marks, K. & Bates, P. 2000. Integration of high-resolution topographic data with floodplain flow models. Hydrolog. Process. 14(11-12): 2109-2122.
10. Maune, D.F. (ed.) 2007. Digital Elevation Model Technologies and Applications. 2nd ed, 620pp. ASPRS editions.
11. Omer, C. R., Nelson, E. J. & Zundel, A. K. 2004. Impact of varied data resolution on hydraulic modeling and flood plain delineation. J. Am.Water Resour. Assoc. 39(2): 467-475.
12. Sioras, P. 2006. Characteristics of the Rapentosa Dam, Personal communication. Athens.
13. Tate, E. C., Olivera, F. & Maidment, D. R. 2002. Creating a terrain model for floodplain mapping. ASCE J. Hydrol. Eng. 7(2): 100-108.
14. Tsakiris, G., Pistrika, Aim., Klampanos, I., Laoupi, A., Ioannidis, Ch., Soile, S. & Georgopoulos, A. 2007. DISMA-Disaster Management GIS with emphasis on cultural sites - Technical Report - Volume I (unpublished). INTERREG IIIC - Sud Initiative and the Regional Operation Framework of NOE Programme - Patrimoine et prevention des risques naturels. Athens, Greece: Centre for theAssessment of Natural Hazards and Proactive Planning.
15. USACE [US Army Corps of Engineers] 2003. HEC-GeoRAS Version 3.1.1. Davis, CA: Institute for Water Resources, Hydrologic Engineering Center.
16. Valeo, C. & Moin, S. M. A. 2000. Grid-resolution effects on a model for integrating urban and rural areas. Hydrolog. Process. 14(14): 2505-2525.
17. Vazquez, R. F., Feyen, L., Feyen, J., & Refsgaard, J. C. 2002. Effect of grid size on effective parameters and model performance of the MIKE-SHE code. Hydrolog. Process. 16(2): 355-372.
18. Wang,Y. & Zheng, T. 2005. Comparison of digital elevation models and understanding of their impact on the flood extent mapping on a coastal floodplain of North Carolina. Nat. Hazards Rev. 6(1): 34-40.
19. Werner, M. J. F. 2001. Impact of grid size in GIS based flood extent mapping using a 1D flow model. Phys. Chem. Earth, Part B, 26(7-8): 517-522.