The OPERA hypothesis: Assumptions and clarifications

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1252, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 124-128

  Patel, Aniruddh D ^a  

^a NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Musical training; Neural encoding; Neural plasticity; Pitch perception; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MUSIC; PITCH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84860252870     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: 17496632     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06426.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Kraus, N. & B. Chandrasekaran 2010. Music training for the development of auditory skills. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11: 599-605.
2. Patel, A.D. & J.R. Iversen 2007. The linguistic benefits of musical abilities. Trends Cognitive Sci. 11: 369-372.
3. Song, J. H., E. Skoe, P. C. Wong & N. Kraus 2008. Plasticity in the adult human auditory brainstemfollowing short-term linguistic training. J. Cognitive Neurosci. 10: 1892-1902.
4. Moreno, S., C. Marques, A. Santos, et al 2009. Musical training influences linguistic abilities in 8-year-old children: more evidence for brain plasticity. Cerebral Cortex 19: 712-723.
5. Patel, A.D. 2011. Why would musical training benefit the neural encoding of speech? The OPERA hypothesis. Front. Psychol. 2: 142. doi:
6. Patel, A.D. 2008. Music, Language, and the Brain. Oxford University Press. New York
7. McDermott, J.H. & A.J. Oxenham 2008. Music perception, pitch, and the auditory system. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 18: 452-463.
8. Patel, A.D., Y. Xu & B. Wang 2010. The role of F0 variation in the intelligibility of Mandarin sentences. In: Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, Chicago, IL
9. Binns, C. & J.F. Culling 2008. The role of fundamental frequency contours in the perception of speech against interfering speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122: 1765-1776.
10. Parbery-Clark, A., E. Skoe & N. Kraus 2009. Musical experience limits the degradative effects of background noise on the neural processing of sound. J. Neurosci. 29: 14100-14107.
11. Parbery-Clark, A., D.L. Strait, S. Anderson, et al 2011. Musical training and the aging auditory system: implications for cognitive abilities and hearing speech in noise. PLoS ONE 6: e18082. doi:
12. Lima, C.F. & S.L. Castro 2011. Speaking to the trained ear: musical expertise enhances the recognition of emotions in speech prosody. Emotion 11: 1021-1031.
13. Drullman, R., J.M. Festen & R. Plomp 1994. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95: 1053-1064.
14. Shannon, R.V., F.G. Zeng, V. Kamath, et al 1995. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 270: 303-304.
15. Cariani, P.A. & B. Delgutte 1996. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. I. Pitch and pitch salience. J. Neurophysiol. 76: 1698-1716.
16. Lappe, C., S.C. Herholz, L.J. Trainor & C. Pantev 2008. Cortical plasticity induced by short-term unimodal and multimodal musical training. J. Neurosci. 8: 9632-9639.