What the numbers say: A digit-based test for election fraud

Political Analysis

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 211-234

  Beber, Bernd ^a   Scacco, Alexandra ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860250065     PISSN: 10471987     EISSN: 14764989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pan/mps003     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Agence France Presse. 2000. Mbeki congratulates Wade for winning Senegal election. Published March 22, 2000.
2. Agence France Presse. 2007. Catholic church joins critics of Nigeria poll amid fresh calls for re-run. Published April 25, 2007.
3. Al-Marzouki, Sanaa, Stephen Evans, Tom Marshall, and Ian Roberts. 2005. Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials. British Medical Journal 331: 267-70.
4. Alvarez, R. Michael, Thad E. Hall, and Susan D. Hyde, eds. 2008. Election fraud: Detecting and deterring electoral manipulation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
5. Beber, Bernd, and Alexandra Scacco. 2011. Replication data for: What the numbers say: A digit-based test for election fraud. IQSS Dataverse Network [Distributor] V1 [Version]. http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/17151 (accessed February 25, 2012).
6. Boland, Philip J., and Kevin Hutchinson. 2000. Student selection of random digits. Statistician 49: 519-29.
7. Budescu, David V. 1987. A Markov model for generation of random binary sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology 13: 25-39.
8. Cantú, Francisco, and Sebastián M. Saiegh. 2011. Fraudulent democracy? An analysis of Argentina's Infamous Decade using supervised machine learning. Political Analysis 19: 409-33.
9. Chapanis, Alphonse. 1953. Random-number guessing behavior. American Psychologist 8: 332.
10. Corder, J. Kevin, and Christina Wolbrecht. 2006. Political context and the turnout of new women voters after suffrage. Journal of Politics 68: 34-49.
11. Deckert, Joseph, Mikhail Myagkov, and Peter C. Ordeshook. 2011. Benford's law and the detection of election fraud. Political Analysis 19: 245-68.
12. Diekmann, Andreas. 2007. Not the first digit! Using Benford's law to detect fraudulent scientific data. Journal of Applied Statistics 34: 321-9.
13. Dlugosz, Stephan, and Ulrich Müller-Funk. 2009. The value of the last digit: Statistical fraud detection with digit analysis. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification 3: 281-90.
14. ECOWAS. 2007a. ECOWAS electoral observers in Senegal. Press release 11/2007, February 25, 2007.
15. ECOWAS. 2007b. ECOWAS observers endorse presidential election in Senegal. Press release 13/2007, February 27, 2007.
16. European Union Election Observation Mission. 2003. Nigeria 2003: Final report on the national assembly, presidential, gubernatorial, and state houses of assembly elections. http://ec.europa.eu/external_relations/human_rights/eu_election_ass_observ/nigeria/rep03.pdf (accessed March 20, 2008).
17. Ichino, Nahomi, and Matthias Schündeln. 2011. Deterring or displacing electoral irregularities? Spillover effects of observers in a randomized field experiment in Ghana. Working paper.
18. Kevles, Daniel J. 1998. The Baltimore case: A trial of politics, science, and character. New York: W. W. Norton.
19. Kew, Darren. 1999. Democrazy: Dem go craze, O: Monitoring the 1999 elections. Issue: A Journal of Opinion 27: 29-33.
20. Kew, Darren. 2004. The 2003 elections: Hardly credible, but acceptable. In Crafting the new Nigeria: Confronting the challenges, ed. Robert I. Rotberg, 139-73. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
21. Kuhl, J., and W. Schönpflug. 1974. Ordnungsverhalten, Lärmbelastung, und Persönlichkeit. Psychological Research 37: 143-76.
22. Levin, Ines, Gabe Cohn, R. Michael Alvarez, and Peter C. Ordeshook. 2009. Detecting voter fraud in an electronic voting context: An analysis of the unlimited reelection vote in Venezuela. Online Proceedings of the Electronic Voting Technology Workshop.
23. Mebane, Walter R., Jr. 2006. Election forensics: Vote counts and Benford's law. Working paper.
24. Mebane, Walter R., Jr. 2008. Election forensics: The second-digit Benford law's test and recent American presidential elections. In Election fraud: Detecting and deterring electoral manipulation, eds. R. Michal Alvarez, Thad E. Hall, Susan D. Hyde, 162-81.Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
25. Mebane, Walter R., Jr. 2011. Comment on "Benford's law and the detection of election fraud." Political Analysis 19: 269-72.
26. Mebane,Walter R., Jr., and Jasjeet S. Sekhon. 2004. Robust estimation and outlier detection for overdispersed multinomial models of count data. American Journal of Political Science 48: 392-411.
27. Mosimann, James E., and Makarand V. Ratnaparkhi. 1996. Uniform occurrence of digits for folded and mixture distributions on finite intervals. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 25: 481-506.
28. Mosimann, James E., Claire V. Wiseman, and Ruth E. Edelman. 1995. Data fabrication: Can people generate random digits? Accountability in Research 4: 31-55.
29. Mosimann, James E., John E. Dahlberg, Nancy M. Davidian, and John W. Krueger. 2002. Terminal digits and the examination of questioned data. Accountability in Research 9: 75-92.
30. Myagkov, Mikhail, Peter C. Ordeshook, and Dimitry Shakin. 2005. Fraud or fairytales: Russia and Ukraine's electoral experience. Post-Soviet Affairs 21: 91-131.
31. Myagkov, Misha, Peter C. Ordeshook, and Dimitri Shakin. 2007. The disappearance of fraud: The forensics of Ukraine's 2006 parliamentary elections. Post-Soviet Affairs 23: 218-39.
32. Myagkov, Mikhail, Peter C. Ordeshook, and Dimitri Shakin, eds. 2009. The forensics of election fraud: Russia and Ukraine. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Nickerson, Raymond S. 2002. Perception and production of randomness. Psychological Review 109: 330-57.
34. Nigrini, Mark J. 1999. I've got your number: How a mathematical phenomenon can help CPAs uncover fraud and other irregularities. Journal of Accountancy 187: 79-83.
35. Preece, D. A. 1981. Distributions of final digits in data. Statistician 30: 31-60.
36. Rapoport, Amnon, and David V. Budescu. 1997. Randomization in individual choice behavior. Psychological Review 104: 603-17.
37. Rath, Gustave J. 1966. Randomization by humans. American Journal of Psychology 79: 97-103.
38. Reuters News. 2007a. Senegal court confirms Wade reelected president. Published March 11, 2007.
39. Reuters News. 2007b. Wade party wins Senegal poll: Foes threaten protest. Published June 7, 2007.
40. Schäfer, Christin, Jörg-Peter Schräpler, Klaus-Robert Mü ller, and Gert Wagner. 2004. Automatic identification of faked and fraudulent interviews by two different methods. German Institute for Economic Research Discussion Paper.
41. Smith, Jane, and Fiona Godlee. 2005. Investigating allegations of scientific misconduct: Journals can only do so much; institutions need to be willing to investigate. British Medical Journal 331: 245-6.
42. The Economist. 2007. Nigeria: How to steal an election. Published April 18, 2007. http://www.economist.com/node/9032254 (accessed July 31, 2011).
43. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1972. Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology 3: 430-54.
44. United Nations Development Programme. 2007. Human Development Report 2007/2008. http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_20072008_EN_Complete.pdf (accessed July 31, 2011).
45. Wand, Jonathan N., KennethW. Shotts, Jasjeet S. Sekhon,Walter R. Mebane. Jr., Michael C. Herron, and Henry E. Brady. 2001. The butterfly did it: The aberrant vote for Buchanan in Palm Beach County, Florida. American Political Science Review 95: 793-810.
46. Watrin, Christoph, Ralf Struffert, and Robert Ullmann. 2008. Benford's law: An instrument for selecting tax audit targets? Review of Managerial Science 2: 219-37.
47. White, Caroline. 2005. Suspected research fraud: Difficulties of getting at the truth. British Medical Journal 331: 245-6.
48. World Bank. 2011. World development indicators. http://databank.worldbank.org (accessed July 31, 2011).
49. Yule, G. Udny. 1927. On reading a scale. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 90: 570-87.